Posted on 09/04/2020 12:12:37 PM PDT by knighthawk
The GoFundMe page set up for San Francisco hair salon owner Erica Kious amid the controversy with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has raised $132,000 as of Friday.
The fundraising page for Kious said it was created just a day ago. Its goal is set at $300,000.
“Erica Kious, a single mother of two and owner of eSalon, where House Speaker Nancy Pelosi got her hair done on Monday, is now being forced to shut down and relocate her business and family due to outrage and threats she is receiving,” the page states, adding that “ALL donations will go directly to Erica to pay off any debts from the business that she is forced to shut down, expenses to relocate and reopen in a new location.”
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Pelosi went to a beauty parlor.
They failed......................
Instead, everybody is now looking at her hair......
<><> watching the extensions covering her aged, thinning hair slip off her head,
<><> looking for the tell-tale gray she needs to get colored every few weeks.......
<><> watching the recently-applied highlights fade away.
Unless she desperately crawls to a new stylist in the dead of night.
What does your post even mean?
They didn’t make her beautiful..................
LIBERAL STUPIDITY IN THE EXTREME Brit Hair salon had to remove job ad for ‘happy’ stylist because it is ‘discriminatory’ against unhappy people
Alison Birch listed a job ad looking for a part-time qualified hairdresser at her AJ’s Unisex Hair Salon in Stroud, England,.
The position called for someone with five years’ experience of working in a salon, who is “confident in barbering as well as all aspects of hairdressing.”
And the advertisement stated, “This is a busy, friendly, small salon, so only happy, friendly stylists need apply.”
But on Wednesday, Birch says she received a call from her local job center informing her they could not run her ad because the word “happy” is considered “discriminatory.”
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
It’s San Francisco. Someone will do her hair, and you can bet her staff will check over the establishment, and the hairdresser/owner will be given instructions of what will happen to her/him if it is leaked Pelosi visited them.
Aah
What the Salon Owners need is a DO NOT SERVE LIST full of Public Officials, Elected Officials, Judicial Officers,... and Their Immediate Families.
Perhaps....but I dont think it will be that easy.....
Nanzi stupidly made “hair” a campaign issue.......everything she does from now on will be explicitly scrutinized.
And remember, Judicial Watch and FOIA are there for US.
Pee Lousey has enough money to get a home visit for her wig repairs.
Pelosi went to a beauty parlor.
They failed......................
I think you have stumbled onto the real blockbuster story in this whole thing.
No 80 year-old woman has fabulous hair like that - I had wondered if it was a wig, but saw no signs of that.
I suppose getting your staff to book appointments every 2 weeks or so will keep up appearances.
Then you fly from DC to SF on a taxpayer-provided plane and have SS escort you to your illegal salon visit. What a crooked b!tch.
Neighbors hanging their hair dryers on Nanzi Pelosi’s tree outside her SF Mansion.
The legend is....once they get into Congress, the anointed ones NEVER EVER spend a penny of their Congressional salary
We, the people, are soaked for every single one of their living expenses.
Now, does Nanzi charge her salon expenses to her Speaker's account?
Does she have a separate living expenses account paid for by taxpayers?
How does Nanzi usually get reimbursed for her expenses?
Did she submit a Congressional voucher to get reimbursed?
How much did she soak the taxpayers for?
Is the amount over and above what she was charged by the salon?
======================================
The salon owner is struggling….a single mother of two, her salon income has been decimated……. But Pelosi has money to burn….courtesy of taxpayers.
BTW……did we the people pay for her “blowout”? Did she receive other services from the salon? Did she charge the visit to her Speaker’s account? Did she put in a Congressional voucher for it? In what amount?
ACTION NOW
Judicial Watch
425 3rd Street, SW, Suite 800
Washington, DC 20024
TELE 1-888-593-8442 between 8:30am and 5:30pm EST.
Call President Trump: Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414
WH EMAIL CONTACT PAGE https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/
US CONGRESS SWITCHBO ARD: (202) 224-3121
U.S. Department of Justice Comment Line: 202-353-1555 Switchboard: 202-514-2000
CAREFUL: you are MOST likely accepting a LONG TIME Liberal Democrap voter who votes for every liberal idea and candidate!
this time, she got her ox gored, but doubt it changes the mind or lack thereof.
The following individuals are exempt from wearing a face covering
Persons younger than two years old. These very young children must not wear a face covering because of the risk of suffocation.
•Persons with a medical condition,mental health condition, or disability that prevents wearing a face covering. This includes persons with a medical condition for whom wearing a face covering could obstruct breathing or who are unconscious, incapacitated, or otherwise unable to remove a face covering without assistance
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.