Posted on 10/21/2020 8:53:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Oh wait...I think the Obama administration and the FBI did that.....just before his ruling on “Obamacare”....I wonder if they found anything wrong?
How is it the Times can even begin to talk about the problems in Haiti while ignoring the 800# gorilla on the island that is the Clinton Foundation?
So, the NYT thinks it fit — as in “All the News That’s Fit We Print” — to examine ACB’s adopted minor children but, for some reason, Joe Biden’s political intrigue with his crack-addled, degenerate son is off-limits.
If Roe v Wade is so right for women...why is it the center piece of every liberals agenda? The truth about R.v W. is the way it is written. R.v W. provides the BabyParts industry a shield as to what Planned Parenthood is 75% or more about...women’s health is way down on the list.
I agree, why attack Barrett’s children when the Times could easily have dragged emotionally troubled Blasey Ford from under the rock she is hiding to bring up the My Kitty party incident when they were both 8 years old and Barrett, high out of her mind on malt liquor, tried to sexually assault Ford.We need a supplemental congressional hearing for this.
But the NYT won’t do a story about Joe Biden’s adult child.
It’s desperation- they’ve got to get SOMETHING on her!
You all remember the NY Times story on the children the Obama’s borrowed........
But what about the collateral damage? Have you considered 5?
Now did you really think that they were going to look at Hunter Biden for 3 weeks?
Now Hunter is COMPLETELY fair game.
When asking why, the real question must be why the New York Times building is not just ashes? Why was it not put to the torch?
Where is Liberty Liberty Valence when he is needed?
My theory was that they were searching for some vague neo-colonial angle, e.g., that Barrett adopted them to Christianize them and save them from - and alienate them from - their indigenous Haitian voodoo traditions.
So they found nothing, but want to slime ACB with the horrible circumstances in Haiti. So they use innuendo and baseless accusations to portray the adoption as corrupt, illegal, or less than an act of love. This article is an attack on her family. How disgusting.
Contrast with Justice John Roberts. The NYT began to investigate Roberts’ adoptions and found that they were almost certainly illegal. They pulled the story, scrubbed it out of existence (try finding the actual story now), and apologized. They said adoptions were a private matter that was off limits, to protect the children. Actual crimes by a SCOTUS nominee undergoing confirmation were “off limits”.
“5 Big Problems With The New York Times Investigation Of Amy Coney Barrett’s Children: Why did the newspaper of record deem it worthwhile to launch a three-week investigation into the life stories of a Supreme Court nominee’s minor children?”
6. No investigation of Hunter Biden, something that would actually matter.
Simple! They were the ones to discovered that Roberts illegally adopted his two children from Ireland and is a multi-time international felon. When they made this find they colluded with the Democrats - probably Schumer to confirm Roberts so they could blackmail him which they did to get his vote for gay marriage Obamacare twice, the citizenship question on the census form, and a few other cases. But now with Barrett’s confirmation they know blackmailing Roberts is over since conservatives will win without him. They hoped to make Barrett their new blackmail target and it fell flat.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.