Posted on 12/10/2020 11:36:23 AM PST by dhuls
No. 22O155
In the Supreme Court of the United States
STATE OF TEXAS, et al., Plaintiffs v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Defendants.
On Motion for Leave to File Bill of Complaint
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICI CURIAE AND BRIEF FOR CONSTITUTIONAL ATTORNEYS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS
ROY S. MOORE
JOHN A. EIDSMOE*
*Counsel of Record
MATTHEW J. CLARK
TALMADGE BUTTS
CONSTITUTIONAL ATTORNEYS
P.O. Box 179 Montgomery, AL 36101 256-510-1828
constitutionalattorneys@gmail.com
Counsel for Amici Curiae
(Excerpt) Read more at supremecourt.gov ...
Consequently, the People who voted legally have been robbed of their chance to select the President and Vice President of the United States. This Court is the only court that can remedy that injustice, and it should do so by ruling in favor of Plaintiffs.
They also are effectively refusing to respond to the overwhelming evidence of voter fraud. Essentially they are saying “you’re not the boss of me” to the Supreme Court. The leftist media (redundant) will cheer them on while ridiculing Texas for bringing up the possibility of secession.
They are arguing that all mail in voting and early voting is unconstitutional because Congress set a fixed day for elections to be held.
I don’t think their argument is going to fly.
Bump
TALMADGE BUTTS? A very lamentable name.
THey are arguing as to how the laws were changed, thus making the ballots illegal
How is their argument supposed to help the case? It seems to be adding more chaff.
No... “The common maxim, delegata potestas non potest delegari means that powers which have been delegated to one branch of government cannot be re-delegated to
another branch. This is especially true when the United States Constitution has specifically delegated a power to state legislatures, as in this case the plenary power
to direct the manner of choosing electors. But in this case, executive officials in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin usurped these powers without the
Legislature’s consent.”
Retired???
"It was neither the intent of the Framers nor the intent of Congress that state executive officials, acting without legislative authority, may implement advance voting schemes that begin months in advance of the election date established by Congress, drag out for days past the election, vary widely from one state to another, and sometimes even vary from county to county within a state."And this:
"Similar usurpation occurred in of Georgia, in which the Secretary of State unilaterally abrogated the Legislature’s requirement concerning signatures and verification of absentee ballots and thereby set aside or “amended” state law.And this:"Likewise, the Michigan Secretary of State, without authority from the Legislature, unilaterally set aside state law and state constitutional provisions by sending unsolicited absentee ballots throughout the state.
"And similarly, the Wisconsin Election Commission and various mayors deliberately ignored Wisconsin statutes safeguarding ballot security by setting up over 500 unmanned dropboxes for the reception of absentee ballots."
"executive officials in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin usurped these powers without the Legislature’s consent. The changes this usurpation has made in our electoral system are nothing short of monumental, and because they have been made without proper safeguards, they have resulted in mass confusion, fraud, ballots lost, fake ballots found, ballots not counted, ballots counted multiple times, and much more, as the Brief of Texas substantiates. Such drastic changes should never have been made by hasty executive fiat."
I really love this...
Response from the Attorney General of Pennsylvania:
Pennsylvania General Assembly Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiff:
http://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163378/20201210144150193_22O155%20Amicus%20Brief.pdf
The GA really lets the AG have it.
Each state’s House and Senate must make those changes or allowances.
The Executive branch of each state cannot unilaterally do that.
He’s the retired chief justice but that doesn’t mean he has surrendered his law license and is not practicing. The title lends gravitas to the filing.
He was elected twice and removed twice. When did he have a chance to retire?
He was elected twice and removed twice. When did he have a chance to retire?
Here’s hoping the PA GA have the will to act if/when they get leave to do so.
The point was that a lot of us in Alabama really would like him to actually retire and stop being heard from.
Summary:
1. “Texas doesn’t have Standing” (where have we heard that before)
2. NO... we didn’t do anything wrong (See Bart Simpson’s brief)
“I didn’t do it... Nobody saw me do it... You cannot prove anything”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.