Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden's Mideast Challenges-Imagine if Iran gets a nuclear bomb
Frontpagemagazine ^ | Jan 27, 2021 | Joseph Puder

Posted on 01/27/2021 7:44:10 AM PST by SJackson

Joe Biden has become the 46th president of the United States. He will face many challenges on the global stage. The Middle East, for one, can be counted on to provide multiple crises and opportunities for America. Below, we examine the most significant of them.

In the past six months four Arab-Muslim majority states normalized relations with the Jewish state. They proceeded to establish diplomatic and commercial relations with Israel; they include Bahrain, United Arab Emirates (UAE), Sudan, and Morocco. The question now is whether the Biden administration will continue this trend, and extend peace between Israel and additional Arab-Muslim states such as Saudi Arabia and Tunisia. Previous assumptions by U.S. administrations have been that Arab states will only make peace with Israel if the Palestinian issue was resolved. President Donald Trump defied this premise, and proved that regional peace between Arab states and Israel mustn’t wait for Palestinian approval, or compliance with its maximalist demands that know no compromise. 

While previous U.S. administrations have sought to bring about a two-state solution that gave the Palestinian leadership veto power, the Trump administration realized that waiting for the Palestinians to compromise might require waiting for the messianic age. In July, 2000, President Bill Clinton arranged the Camp David Two Summit with the purpose of ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He summoned Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) chairman Yasser Arafat (also President of the Palestinian Authority-PA), and Israel’s Prime Minister Ehud Barak to the secluded camp. The latter (Barak) made far reaching concessions, witnessed and appreciated by President Clinton. Arafat didn’t agree to “end the conflict,” he chose instead to initiate the Second violent Intifada. This was repeated eight years later when Israeli Premier Ehud Olmert, who made even greater concessions to Mahmud Abbas (Abu Mazen), President of the PA. He too would not agree to end the conflict. 

The Biden administration may seek to incentivize the Palestinians with financial rewards, but that will not work, just as President Trump’s “Deal of the Century,” which was meant to uplift the lives of the Palestinian people, failed. Trump realized then that he had to bypass the rejectionist Palestinian leadership. Antony Blinken, the Biden administration nominee for Secretary of State said this in December, 2020. “This isn’t 2009, it’s not 2014 and it’s not 2017. The parties are far from a place where they’re ready to engage on negotiations or final status talks.” It appears that President Biden is showing interest in expanding the peace between the moderate Sunni-Arab states and Israel, but the mantra of the Two-State solution is still the pervasive line in Washington. He will not, however, be in a rush to get involved in the Middle East. Domestic priorities override everything. 

The Biden administration may not reverse President Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital nor relocate the U.S. embassy back to Tel Aviv. Biden is more than likely restore the Palestinian mission in Washington DC, closed by Trump. Biden might also reverse Trump’s cutoff of funding to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). Established in 1949, to care for Palestinian refugees, it was expected to complete its work in one year. Now, 71 years later, UNRWA is still being funded by the UN despite its malignant role as a training ground for Palestinian terrorists, and a hotbed for dissemination of anti-Semitic hatred toward Israel and Jews. Moreover, in its 71 years, it failed to settle a single refugee. By way of contrast, the UN main refugee organization - The United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), managed to resettle more than 50 million refugees. But, aside from UNRWA’s failure to perform its mission, it is rife with corruption and mismanagement. Hence, in addition to the U.S., the Netherlands, and Switzerland have also suspended funding for UNRWA.

Perhaps more critical, and clearly an existential issue for Israel, and for the security of the world, is a nuclear Iran. Iran is not only violating the nuclear agreement (JCPOA) with world powers, it is testing long-range ballistic missiles, and has positioned rockets in Syria capable of hitting every corner of Israel. Moreover, the Islamic Republic of Iran is engaged in global terror. It is using its own agents or such proxies as the Lebanese-based Hezbollah terrorist group.

Biden has written that, “If Iran returns to strict compliance with the nuclear deal, the U.S. would rejoin the agreement as a starting point for follow on negotiations, and lift the sanctions on Iran that Trump imposed.”

Richard Nephew, a former top sanctions official involved in the negotiations with Iran during the Obama administration, pointed out that Iran’s announcement of a 20% Uranium enrichment will shorten the breakout time it would take Iran to produce weapons-grade fuel for a nuclear bomb, which is currently estimated to be about six months or less. With a sufficient stockpile of enriched uranium at a 20% level, the Iranians could “potentially narrow the breakout time to about a month and a half.”

Iran is enriching a half-kilo of uranium daily. According to Ali Akbar Salehi, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Iran is producing half a kilo of 20% enriched uranium per day. Salehi, in an interview with the Persian language website Khamenei.ir, said, “Based on the latest news I have, they (Iranian scientists at nuclear installations) are producing 20 grams of 20% enriched uranium; every hour, meaning that practically, we are producing half a kilo every day.” While it might appear as if Iran is increasing the pressure on the U.S. to rejoin the JCPOA and lift the sanctions, it may also be true that the radical Iranian regime seeks to have a bomb at all costs.

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu tweeted that “Iran’s decision to continue violating its commitments, to raise the enrichment level and advance its industrial ability to enrich uranium underground, cannot be explained in any way except as continued realization of its intention to develop a military nuclear program.

Iranian arrogance has no boundaries.  According to the Iranian regime’s mouthpiece Fars News Agency (January 20, 2021) Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, “There is no need to negotiations at all …if they (Americans) remove the sanctions, there will be no problem from our view.” Zarif reiterated earlier (January 18, 2021) that Iran would not change even a single word of the agreement. He added, that the “U.S. needs to pay reparations for the damage it has inflicted on Iran.”

For the Ayatollahs of Iran who invented the slogans of “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” the goal is to terrorize both the Middle East and the rest of the world with nuclear weapons. Even if the Iranians do not intend to use its nukes, they have precision-guided missiles that pose an immediate threat to Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, as well as to U.S. forces in the region. The Biden administration, while seeking a rapprochement with Iran, should leverage sanction relief from Trump’s “Maximum Pressure,” for a much stronger nuclear deal than the 2015 JCPOA. A deal should curb Iran’s precision-missile exports, terror sponsorship, and erase the sunset clause of the JCPOA.

President Biden must consider the fact that even without nukes, Iran keeps challenging and provoking the U.S. and Israel. Imagine then, how horrific it would be if Iran got a nuclear bomb.  

Joseph Puder, a freelance journalist, is the founder and executive director of the Interfaith Taskforce for America and Israel (ITAI).



TOPICS: Editorial; Israel; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: enrichment; iran; iranianwmd; iranwmd; israel; javadsarif; proliferation; reparations; uranium; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2021 7:44:10 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Joebama Obiden will be paying the Iranians for their development of nuclear weapons like the Kenyanesian Usurper was.


2 posted on 01/27/2021 7:45:54 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
Middle East and terrorism, occasional political and Jewish issues Ping List. High Volume If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.

1.5 to 6 months to a bomb. Sound too short, but possible coming from an Obama official. Doesn't worry Joe, a mideast war has nothing to do with us. We're self sufficient in oil. For a month or two more. No reason not to finance it.

3 posted on 01/27/2021 7:45:55 AM PST by SJackson (If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun...folks in Philly like a good brawl, BH Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Imagine if Bidet gets a brain. That’s harder to do than imagining Iran with nukes.


4 posted on 01/27/2021 7:46:13 AM PST by Fai Mao (Biden is a pedophile, Kamala is a #%¥π.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

With a little luck, the Iranians would nuke other Moslems. That might be a net gain.


5 posted on 01/27/2021 7:48:11 AM PST by Little Ray (The Left and Right no longer have anything in common. A House divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

I don’t see Biden doing anything, other than hustling some statement to the UN, and hoping that the EU does something.


6 posted on 01/27/2021 7:48:16 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Thanks Joe.

I’ll be teaching my granddaughters to ‘Duck and Cover’, before they kiss their ass goodbye.

Democrat ‘Daisy’ TV Ad

https://youtu.be/riDypP1KfOU


7 posted on 01/27/2021 7:50:47 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

When the Iranians get the bomb the media (Joe Biden’s real press secretary) will cheer it as a good thing.


8 posted on 01/27/2021 7:52:57 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Bibi and the Saudis will never, ever, ever, allow Iran to get a bomb.

And the reason why we know Iran doesn’t have a bomb? Because they haven’t set it off yet. The second they have a bomb, they will set it off somewhere. They cannot afford to “hold” it like a hot potato.

And...the second they put a bomb together, the material sends out emissions that would be picked up in labs and “listening” posts in Russia, India, Israel, Iraq, Turkey, and all over Europe. It would be triangulated in about ten minutes.


9 posted on 01/27/2021 7:54:33 AM PST by Vermont Lt (We have entered "Insanity Week." Act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The sooner the better at this point. Maybe they will target DC...


10 posted on 01/27/2021 7:55:17 AM PST by Democrat = party of treason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

20% enriched uranium is a long way from weapons-grade (80-85% or better). How much weapons-grade uranium do they have / are they producing?


11 posted on 01/27/2021 7:55:34 AM PST by Campion (What part of "shall not be infringed" don't they understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

They already have it.


12 posted on 01/27/2021 7:57:20 AM PST by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion

Actually its not. 20% to 93% is a pretty easy jump. You take the materials that you put into 200 centrifuges to go to 20%; clean them out, and put it back in you have almost increased your efficiency by 5x. When it gets to 10%, do it again.

23% to 93%, using the same number of centrifuges is a five or six step process.


13 posted on 01/27/2021 8:04:39 AM PST by Vermont Lt (We have entered "Insanity Week." Act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Fine. Just nuke the swamp.


14 posted on 01/27/2021 8:12:18 AM PST by LittleBillyInfidel (This tagline has been formatted to fit the screen. Some content has been edited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Imagine then, how horrific it would be if Iran got a nuclear bomb.

Not necessary, I have it on good authority that Joe Biden is going to dispatch John Kerry with a plane load of Nuclear Warheads to Iran, just to make it fair.
15 posted on 01/27/2021 8:14:13 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
I believe you are correct. One reason we know Iran does not (yet) have a nuclear weapon is they haven't set it off. I do not believe the Iranian leadership is entirely rational by our standards. Even knowing there would be severe consequences and a counter-attack I believe if the Iranians had a chance to "strike a great blow for allah" or some such nonsense then they would. They want to be seen as leaders in Islam, not the Saudis. They probably think it would gain them respect throughout the Islamic world.

I don't think the Iranians are *too* close -- yet. Simply because as you point out, the Israelis haven't sent in an air strike and wiped out several facilities in Iran -- yet. Various sources have pointed out that an air strike deep into Iran is just barely within the capability of Israel's Air Force, or just slightly beyond their capability, depending on which source(s) you believe.

One wrinkle in this is the Saudis. The Saudis view themselves as the caretakers of Islam. After all, Mecca and Medina are in Saudi Arabia. They know that if those {censored} fools in Iran actually managed to set off a WMD on Israeli territory then Israel will retaliate -- probably by wiping Mecca and Medina off the face of the Earth. The Saudis are realistic enough to know they probably couldn't prevent that. So their choice would be let some non-Arabs (Iranians) do something foolish and threaten the very existence of Islam's holiest sites...or help Israel keep something bad from happening.

Saudi and Israeli officials have toured each others' airbases. There was some unofficial talk of Saudi letting Israeli combat aircraft transit Saudi airspace and even refuel at Saudi airbases "if necessary." A non-hostile ingress/egress path and no need to commit their entire tanker fleet to the effort greatly simplifies the Israeli Air Force's plans. This kind of material help puts it in the entirely doable category. The Saudis might even fly support missions - taking out radar and/or AA sites in Iran. When it comes to defending Mecca and Medina there is nothing I wouldn't put past the Saudis. Taking Iran down a notch or two is well within the realm of possibility. Especially considering all the problems Iran is causing in Yemen that keeps bleeding over into Saudi Arabia.

16 posted on 01/27/2021 8:25:03 AM PST by ThunderSleeps (Biden/Harris - illegitimate and everyone knows it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

“Simply because as you point out, the Israelis haven’t sent in an air strike and wiped out several facilities in Iran — yet. Various sources have pointed out that an air strike deep into Iran is just barely within the capability of Israel’s Air Force, or just slightly beyond their capability, depending on which source(s) you believe.”


One has to wonder what the Abrahamic Accords were all about....LOL

Methinks there are probably codicils on those agreements that allow for overflight or refueling with an explanation within 24 hours. Which means, “We did not know...”

The world moves in a chess game. Its not necessarily 4D, but we have been circling Iran for 30 years. It hasn’t been to push back the russians.


17 posted on 01/27/2021 8:29:02 AM PST by Vermont Lt (We have entered "Insanity Week." Act accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

If Iran builds and deploys their own nuclear weapons, President Asterisk will suddenly snap out of his stupor, and like a genius, find a way to peaceably settle the whole problem of Peace in the Middle East... with just a phone call!

He will tell them that if they don’t play nice, he won’t send along that palette full of fresh Benjamin Franklins. At least for a while. That’ll teachem!


18 posted on 01/27/2021 9:56:20 AM PST by Richard Axtell (President Asterisk is an ass to risk the economy and rights of all Americans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Not to worry if Iran gets a nuke.....I am sure that Dementia Joe will have the same response that Ovomit had when he was asked about Iran and a nuke and if Iran hit us with a nuke. Ovomit, in true fashion stated that HE WOULD NOT RETAILATE EVEN IF WE WERE NUKED BY IRAN. Sure is going to be a very very LONG 4 years.


19 posted on 01/27/2021 12:59:49 PM PST by kagnew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

The Iranians are itching for the bomb.
They’re working on it with the help from the Communist Russians, CCP Communist Red Chinese the DPRK Communist North Korea.
Biden has already told Russia he’ll look the other way while Israelis are prepping for an attack with the help of Arabs.


20 posted on 01/27/2021 10:34:58 PM PST by StoneWall Brigade (NATIONALISM IS RIGHT WINGED MARXISM GO BACK TO AMERICANISM /REAGANISM IT WORKS )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson