Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

But it SOUNDS SO AWESOME!
1 posted on 01/27/2021 9:30:49 PM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: rktman

I know. Our energy bills will be the same as our mortgage/rent.

I cant wait.


2 posted on 01/27/2021 9:33:37 PM PST by joshua c (Jan 20th is Dump Day. Dump them all. Twitter, Facebook, Google, Amazon, cable tv etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Even that idiot michael moron had a “duh moment” when he realized that.

They aren’t the sharpest tool in the tool shed. Or come to think of it, not even the sharpest tool in the archeological sites. ( since we are after all speaking fossil fuels)


3 posted on 01/27/2021 9:34:41 PM PST by patriot torch (Ashlie Babbitt-say her name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Places where wind is available are usually not close to population centers, so the grid is extremely important. It will need huge investments in storage also, which simply doesn’t exist now.

Offshore wind become “a thing” about 25 years ago. Denmark and Holland are just about to find out how costly it will be to decommission those first spent windmills at sea, who are now breaking down, and the bases of which weigh 300 tons


4 posted on 01/27/2021 9:36:47 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

This isn’t about clean energy....it’s about the massive investors in companies that the elites are highly invested in across the board in the US and on the world stage........which eventually every nation will have carbon tax’s to pay if they’re not purchasing their “green’ solutions. Either or the revenue flow is what they’re after......and control.


6 posted on 01/27/2021 9:41:36 PM PST by caww (“For the people” and “For the children” - signals we're about to be scammed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Every stage in manufacturing wind turbines involves fossil fuels, and plenty of them. Without steel, cement, and fiberglass, there is no wind turbine. All the three are produced with fossil fuels.
= = =

But, in a billion years those turbines and towers will have evolved to be self creating and not need those fossil fuels.


7 posted on 01/27/2021 9:42:32 PM PST by Scrambler Bob (This is not /s. It is just as viable as any MSM 'information', maybe more so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Solyndra II


8 posted on 01/27/2021 9:43:55 PM PST by Fledermaus (The Republican Party is DEAD! It took 160 years but The Whigs Struck Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Disposal of components used in
windmills and solar panels will
create major problems with land
space and contamination of soils.
Fiberglass (wind turbine blades),
is non-recyclable. Many components
in solar panels contain hazardous
chemicals, and are also non-
recyclable.
EV batteries suffer the same
problems.
Millions of windmills and solar
panels would be required to supply
the nation’s electric power needs.
Euphoria is fleeting.


12 posted on 01/27/2021 10:48:57 PM PST by Lean-Right (Eat More Moose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I’m sorry to hear that Gina McCarthy is brain-damaged.


17 posted on 01/28/2021 12:03:38 AM PST by kiryandil (New Movie: The Assassination Of Ashli Babbitt By The Anonymous Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman; All
Politicians are not critical thinker, and do not realize that actions have consequences. There are brownouts in California, but the clowns in Sacramento want all,electric cars in 15 years. Nukes, coal and natural gas are not an option... hydro is not on the horizon... I guess these jerks think solar and wind are the answer.

It takes a special kind of stupid to be a democrat.

18 posted on 01/28/2021 12:57:29 AM PST by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

I personally have always thought that wind generation of electricity is an example of a reverse economy of scale. It makes a certain amount of sense for — say — a single household off the power grid because of distance or other isolating circumstances, but when one tries to scale it up to a major contributor to the power network, it fails.

Smaller installations, designed and built of recyclable, modular parts, generating electricity for single farms or small communities might be more viable. Especially if they had the ability to sell any surplus power they generated to the regional or national grid, and buy power from that source when their wind generation was inadequate.


19 posted on 01/28/2021 1:26:00 AM PST by VietVetwcm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

The great scam


20 posted on 01/28/2021 1:59:19 AM PST by ronnie raygun ( Massive mistakes are made by arrogant fools; massive evils are committed by evil people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman
Who in their right mind (but I think I just answered my own question) would think it makes sense to replace a few huge ground-based turbines with hundreds or thousands of small ones, perched 150 or 200 feet in the air? Conventional power plants take advantage of economies of scale to generate electricity efficiently and affordable, while wind farms ignore efficiency and cost-effectiveness in favor of built-in inefficiency. A conventional power plant also has far fewer moving parts to maintain and replace than a wind farm with thousands upon thousand of duplicate parts. And all of those parts in the conventional plant are on the ground, where they’re easily accessible. Obviously not so with a wind farm. They’re all perched high in the air, making it difficult and expensive to service them.

I think of a conventional power plant like the engine in your car. Would any sane person propose to replace that engine with hundreds of tiny model car engines? Of course not. And even that absurd scenario would be less ridiculous than the use of wind power, because at least it would be easy to access the model car engines to maintain them.

22 posted on 01/28/2021 2:41:52 AM PST by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Where do these f*cking idiots think we are going to get the electricity for all these “zero emissions” electric cars.

Oh, just ask AOC, she knows. “It comes from the wall, silly.”


25 posted on 01/28/2021 3:40:25 AM PST by FroggyTheGremlim (I'll be good, I will, I will!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

Bkmk


26 posted on 01/28/2021 3:55:35 AM PST by kelly4c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8294057/Hundreds-non-recyclable-fiberglass-wind-turbine-blades-pictured-piling-landfills.html


27 posted on 01/28/2021 4:08:58 AM PST by Vlad The Inhaler (Rep. Matt Gaetz - Deep in the chest of every digital Woketopian beats the heart of an online tyrant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rktman

NO GREASE==NOTHING continues turning


35 posted on 01/28/2021 8:08:42 AM PST by ridesthemiles ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson