Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Celebrities Urge GOP Electors To Deny Trump Electoral College Win (Max Greenwood, 2016 on huffpost)
Huffington Post ^ | 12/14/2016 | Max Greenwood

Posted on 02/11/2021 9:57:33 AM PST by ColoCdn

Celebrities Urge GOP Electors To Deny Trump Electoral College Win

m.huffpost.com

High-profile actors and musicians are joining calls to deny Donald Trump the 270 electoral votes he needs to clinch the presidency, urging members of the Electoral College to choose someone more qualified in a video posted on YouTube Wednesday.

“As you know, our Founding Fathers built the Electoral College to safeguard the American people from the dangers of a demagogue, and to ensure that the presidency only goes to someone who is ‘to an eminent degree, endowed with the requisite qualifications,’” “The West Wing” star Martin Sheen said. He was joined by 17 other celebrities, including Bob Odenkirk, Debra Messing and Moby.

The video, paid for by the anti-Trump group Unite For America, is the latest in a long-shot effort to urge Republican electors in states where Trump won the popular vote to break from the presumed president-elect and choose anyone else. Electoral College members will meet in their respective state capitals on Dec. 19 to formally elect the next president.

Several celebrities in the video said they’re not asking electors to vote for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton. They’re asking the electors not to vote for Trump.

“As you know, the Constitution gives the electors the right to vote for any eligible person,” “M.A.S.H” star Mike Farrell says.

“But it should certainly be someone you consider especially competent,” Debra Messing adds.

Twenty-nine states and the District of Columbia have laws requiring members of the Electoral College to cast their ballots based on the winner of the popular vote in their state. But federal lawsuits in several states, including California and Washington, are challenging those laws, aiming to undo them across the country and free electors to vote for whomever they wish.

Harvard constitutional law professor Lawrence Lessig and law firm Durie Tangri have offered to provide free legal counsel to Republican electors who break from their states’ popular votes.

Trump won 306 electoral votes in the Nov. 8 election, while Clinton took 232. But Clinton leads Trump in the national popular vote by more than 2.8 million – the widest margin in history in which a candidate won the popular vote, but lost the electoral vote.

One Republican elector from Texas, Chris Suprun, has indicated he will not vote for Trump. Opponents of the real estate mogul will have to convince an additional 36 Republican electors to cast their votes for someone other than Trump if they hope to deny him the presidency.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: celebrities; electoralcollege; learnhowtopost
To the Mods: I know it's the huffpaste, but the author, Max Greenwood, just wrote a slanted article for The Hill on election reform in Georgia. I thought it might be germane. The entire article is excerpted.
1 posted on 02/11/2021 9:57:33 AM PST by ColoCdn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

Just another reminder of the industrial waste level of Dhimmicrat hypocrisy.


2 posted on 02/11/2021 9:59:06 AM PST by ColoCdn (Nihil, sine deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

As it happens in 2016 Trump had two faithless electors and Clinton had five. Be careful of what you wish for.


3 posted on 02/11/2021 10:05:05 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
As it happens in 2016 Trump had two faithless electors and Clinton had five. Be careful of what you wish for.

You ain't kidding. There's also this from the article: "Harvard constitutional law professor Lawrence Lessig and law firm Durie Tangri have offered to provide free legal counsel to Republican electors who break from their states’ popular votes."

That didn't work out so well. Three of Clinton's faithless electors were fined $1,000 each under Washington's faithless elector law, and indeed Lawrence Lessig represented them all the way to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court unanimously upheld the fine in Chiafalo v. Washington last year, holding that punitive faithless elector laws do not violate the constitution.

As the opinion, authored Justice Kagan, Lessig's former boss at Harvard Law, no less: "The Electors’ constitutional claim has neither text nor history on its side. Article II and the Twelfth Amendment give States broad power over electors, and give electors themselves no rights." Good job, Larry.

4 posted on 02/11/2021 10:24:42 AM PST by The Pack Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

Does President Trump remain in the running for a participation trophy??


5 posted on 02/11/2021 12:53:14 PM PST by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColoCdn

Yep. The second of the endless coup attempts.


6 posted on 02/11/2021 12:56:18 PM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson