Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: After Team Trump Offers 301 Witnesses, Dems Want to Substitute CNN Hearsay Instead (UPDATE)
National File ^ | February 13, 2021 | Tom Pappert

Posted on 02/13/2021 10:40:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

Democrats in the Senate were joined by Sens. Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, Lisa Murkowski, and Ben Sasse in a vote to allow last minute witnesses to testify in the impeachment trial. As the Senate has to individually vote to determine whether each witness can speak, the Trump legal defense team exploited the time commitment by offering at least 301 witnesses.

As a result, the Democrats are now exploring whether they can simply include an article by CNN, reporting on a phone call that someone overheard and then summarized to someone else who then summarized to CNN, in lieu of any witnesses at all.

The failing cable network reported, “CNN’s Dana Bash is told by one of the sources involved in these discussions that there are bipartisan talks about putting Jamie Gangel’s article in the trial record, instead of calling the witnesses.”

The article in question relates to a story published by CNN about an alleged phone call that took place between Rep. Kevin McCarthy and President Donald Trump. Nobody who spoke to CNN was on the phone call, or even overheard the phone call. Instead, CNN claims the call was “described to CNN by multiple Republicans briefed on it.”

In short, the Democrats wanted to hear from witnesses to slow down the seemingly inevitable acquittal of President Trump. When the Trump legal team exploited this tactical error to include 301 new witnesses, the Democrats then decided that witnesses are not actually important, and could be substituted with an article from CNN about a phone call that someone overheard then told someone else about who then told CNN.

Apparently, Democrats feel more confidant about using third person hearsay than hearing from 301 witnesses from the Trump campaign, or disallowing them to speak altogether.

The media seemed to panic when the Trump legal team showed them the list of names:

When the media was told the Trump team would ask for witnesses, one reporter seemingly panicked at the number.

“In the hundreds?” the female reporter asked as the Trump legal team member began to leave. “Jason, in the hundreds?”

The man simply turned around and briefly showed the document he was holding to the media. The document has “Witness list 301 (so far) written in thick sharpie marker.

Among the witnesses the Trump legal team would like to call are House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Vice President Kamala Harris, Sen. Chuck Schumer, a New York Times reporter, and Muriel Bowser, the Mayor of Washington, D.C.

UPDATE: After National File’s reporting, it appears all witnesses have been cancelled, and the CNN article will not be used. Instead, a statement from Rep. Herrera Beutler will be added to the record. The impeachment trial will now move on to closing arguments.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: beutler; cnn; jaimebeutler; jaimeherrerabeutler; shampeachment; waronmccarthy; warontrump; witnesses
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2021 10:40:21 AM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Third hand heresay evidence? This doesn’t even qualify as a kangaroo court trial. Kangaroos have some principles, unlike Democrats.


2 posted on 02/13/2021 10:41:56 AM PST by BipolarBob (It's all fun and games until Mrs. Bipolar catches me posting on Free Republic without permission.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

How do you cross-examine a CNN story?


3 posted on 02/13/2021 10:42:24 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Republicans propose 301 witnesses. Sounds about right.


4 posted on 02/13/2021 10:43:06 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Butt, butt, butt.....

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3934232/posts


5 posted on 02/13/2021 10:43:08 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Even Judge Judy doesn’t allow heresay testimony..as soon as someone in her courtroom says “Oh someone told me” she shuts them down and says that is NOT allowed


6 posted on 02/13/2021 10:45:26 AM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

HA! Hysterical! 😆


7 posted on 02/13/2021 10:45:37 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I hope this is true. This gave me the heartiest laugh I have had in a long time.


8 posted on 02/13/2021 10:45:37 AM PST by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob

Kangaroos have backbones and pugnaciousness, unlike Republicans. This is pathetic! If you won’t demand actual witnesses and your own witnesses as well, you are yellow-bellied poltroons.


9 posted on 02/13/2021 10:45:49 AM PST by Eleutheria5 ("The impossible happens all the time. You just have to believe." Will Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BipolarBob
What's comical about this idiocy is that the alleged conversation weighs heavily in Trump's favor.

If President Trump agreed to "call of his supporters" then he would have been explicitly admitting that: (1) they answered to him, and (2) he had any control over them.

Imagine if someone burglarized your neighbor's home ... and he called you on the phone, informed you of the incident, and told you to keep your teenage son away from his property.

You'd have to be a moron to say: "Oh, sure. I'm so sorry about that."

Anyone would half a brain would say: "Do you have any evidence that my son did this?"

10 posted on 02/13/2021 10:46:17 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("There's somebody new and he sure ain't no rodeo man.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Trump’s lawyers are about to present truth to the Democrat clown show and the RATS don’t want their phony dog and pony show impeachment “trial” blowing up in their faces!


11 posted on 02/13/2021 10:46:40 AM PST by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They have to keep changing the rules because the keep losing.


12 posted on 02/13/2021 10:46:45 AM PST by UnwashedPeasant (Trump is the last legally elected U.S. President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

CNN is, like,: "No problem whatsoever."

13 posted on 02/13/2021 10:47:01 AM PST by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

RAT folded when the Rs said bring Pelosi as first witness.


14 posted on 02/13/2021 10:47:02 AM PST by View from the Cheap Seats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The Rs are going to suffer the consequences of this impeachment, much more so than the socialists.


15 posted on 02/13/2021 10:47:28 AM PST by JonPreston (Q: Never have so many, been so wrong, so often)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Whoa! said the dem a$$holes. We wanted a circus but not an actual one.


16 posted on 02/13/2021 10:47:41 AM PST by DPMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’d like to see how long it would take for each of the 301 witnesses to take the stand.

Let the trial continue for months. The more they focus on this, the less time for legislative mischief to concoct.


17 posted on 02/13/2021 10:47:55 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fuster cluck.


18 posted on 02/13/2021 10:48:16 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"...Mitt Romney, Lindsey Graham, Lisa Murkowski, and Ben Sasse..."

Lindsey just doesn't care what type of company he keeps....

19 posted on 02/13/2021 10:48:24 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("You'll never hear surf music again" - J. Hendrix)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Jamie Gangel......CNN......married to Daniel Silva.....who has gone south on his Gabriel Allon books


20 posted on 02/13/2021 10:48:49 AM PST by Guenevere (When the foundations are being destroyed what can the righteous do)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson