Replies

American Jews are now part of the ownership class. Jews were immigrants from somewhere else. And they needed the right to have public education. And they needed power to have enough income and wealth for their families that they could put their kids through college and their kids could do better than they have done. Both economic opportunity through the labor movement and an educational opportunity through public education were key for Jews to go from the working class to the ownership class. What I hear when I hear that question is that those who are in the ownership class now want to take that ladder of opportunity away from those who do not have it.

I'm speechless... this is so stupid it takes my breath away...

Weingarten is all about Weingarten. Having taught a mere 6 months in a classroom, she levered herself into the role of UFT (United Federation of Teachers) president when the original commie founder died. Not only was she responsible for the worst contract for teachers ever, giving away important protection rights, holidays, etc. for a tiny pittance of a raise, but she was only in that position long enough for her to use it as a stepping stone to an even higher position (and thus able to do even more damage), the presidency of the AFT. She is a Jew only by virtue of having emerged from the womb of a Jewish woman--certainly not by any remote semblance of observance. She is a lesbian "married" to a fake woman "rabbi". According to Jewish law, women cannot be rabbis, so this "wife" of hers is a complete lie and sham. So, Weingarten's entire life as a Jew is a complete sham. For her to then condemn normal Jews, who worked hard and sacrificed much so that their children could have a better life and largely succeeded in that endeavor, is worse than disgusting. This pervert is suggesting---merely to be PC by the current upside-down prevailing logic---that Jews are actively working to deprive other groups of the opportunity to also pull themselves up by their own bootstraps for a better life for them and their children.

That is triple distilled B.S. You do not see multi-generational welfare cases involving Jews or Asians as you do blacks and Hispanics. You do not see a 75% illegitimacy rate among Jews as you do with blacks. Having a child out of wedlock while you're still a teen spells the end of education and training for most of these teen mothers and sets them and their offspring up for yet another generation of welfare. Hispanics have a 49% illegitimacy rate, and the same goes for them. Asians have about a 10% illegitimacy rate, and I could not even find stats for Jewish illegitimacy. However, I know it's very unusual to even hear about a Jewish child born out of wedlock, and I'm not even talking about among the Orthodox, where such a thing is virtually unknown.

I am sure that a lack of higher education (the correlation for lower education level and having an out of wedlock child are quite significant), an obvious lack of personal discipline, and the demands of raising a child by yourself affecting your work performance (such as having to take off to care for a sick child) are what keep groups other than Jews down. It's a cheap self-hating shot for the despicable Weingarten to blame Jews for something they had nothing to do with.

None are so blind as those who refuse to see. First, the education system is crapola. Johnny can’t climb the ladder because nobody taught him how. Second, in order to create ‘generational wealth’ you have to have an intact family and income and savings. The tactics employed in the war on poverty have decimated that opportunity for many people, not “the Jews” or “white people”. Third, while she is completely wrong the problem is that she believes in these new nebulous doctrines about race and equity and outcomes while most people in American were raised to believe in the doctrines of equality of opportunity and merit. She’s the one who is out of touch and it seemingly frustrates her that she is unable and ill-equipped to openly admit what she believes in, probably because she knows it will be roundly rejected by society at large. People like her cloak their real beliefs behind euphemisms that sound vaguely familiar but means whatever the listener infers from it - intentionally done to obfuscate the real agendas. There is a world of difference between “equality” and “equity” but to most people they sound similar enough so they get away with it. Most are too polite to call BS on these kinds of language manipulations or simply don’t know what’s hidden behind the swapping of these words.