Audit Cams Went Out In Middle of Night in Windham, NH When Dem AG walked in…

Populist Press ^ | 05/17/2021

[SeekAndFind]

Click here to read the full article

Before the secu­ri­ty cam­era footage went out for about an hour, we see an image of NH Asso­ciate AG Anne Edwards walk­ing toward a table cov­ered with “secured” bal­lots – from the Novem­ber elec­tion in Windham.

My con­tact in Wind­ham tells me that, before the cam­eras go out, the state Troop­er (also pic­tured) can be heard say­ing some­thing to the effect that there’s nobody else in the room.

Of course not. It’s a secured room short­ly before midnight.

We are inter­est­ed in why the troop­er would say that. Or why the live stream micro­phones were on before the cam­eras (all pic­tures and audio) were off for an hour and 15 min­utes. But why was Ann Edwards from the NH AG’s office even there at that hour?

At 11:15 pm on Wednes­day. And then the cam­eras go black for over an hour.

[Red Badger]

[ClearCase_guy]

These people are so subtle and clever. We can barely tell that they’re doing illegal stuff.

[ProtectOurFreedom]

Wow...can this be true?

According to my source, on Thursday morning, there were four more boxes of ballots than the original number signed off by Nicole from the Town of Windham. The Windham clerk signed off 23 boxes but the auditors have 27?

Why didn’t anyone notice that on Wednesday?

Too bad he cannot or will not identify his unnamed source. This should be easy enough to verify or disprove.

[Kid Shelleen]

True, we’ve been saying this since we found modems in Michigan election equipment
Good Morning !
NBC News apparently found an expert answer to what happens if a 4G modem is discovered in voting equipment. “Once you add that modem, you are de-certifying it ... It (the election) is no longer federally certified." Good to know, right? - https://nbcnews.com/politics/elections/online-vulnerable-experts-find-nearly-three-dozen-u-s-voting-n1112436

Twitter account of Matthew S. DePerno, Esq. -
https://twitter.com/mdeperno/status/1394267352624140289

[sten]

it’s called a coverup

[hanamizu]

Comrades! We have been told repeatedly that any questioning of the results of the 2020 election are a “threat to the Constitution and democracy itself” and, in fact, constitute an ‘insurrection’.

The fact that cameras go off, or that votes for Biden mysteriously materialize in the dead of night, or that boxes of ballots are fetched after poll observers are sent home, are merely coincidences that feed into the false narrative that the most popular candidate for President, Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., really didn’t win his office.

[Lazamataz]

It really has gotten to the point that they are taunting us.

[glimmerman70]

The police were in on all this. They likely used the police to take Trump ballots away while they brought in biden ballots. They were in on Arizona also. Had something to do with the routers not being turned over in Arizona because it pinned the police in it.. How I have no idea. But that’s the excuse Arizona was using for the router situation there. Maybe the same here.

[Trumplican]

It’s called contributing factors of an upcoming civil war.

[TangoLimaSierra]

Had something to do with the routers not being turned over in Arizona because it pinned the police in it.. How I have no idea.

IIRC, the police used the same routers as the election board.

[glimmerman70]

I am not that smart about this stuff could you briefly explain. Would they prove the police were in on it or just give away stuff the police use that citizens shouldn’t know about.

[kiryandil]

IIRC, the police used the same routers as the election board.

That's what the Soros-puppet sheriff says.

But if his lips are moving, Soros Foundation lies are spewing out.

[Rurudyne]

Kinda like the cameras breaking when Epstein didn’t kill himself.

[marktwain]

IIRC, the police used the same routers as the election board.

If so, that nullifies any election security.

Election routers are to be kept separate from others.

[Dr. Franklin]

These people are so subtle and clever. We can barely tell that they’re doing illegal stuff.

The game is that you can't prove it since we all must believe the one cop who was there when the camera's went out. So now if you don't believe this was just an innocent glitch, you must be a conspiracy theorist because there is no evidence to contradict the cop. So the system the board of selectmen put in place allows one corrupt cop to sabotage the audit. This is the game being played.

[T.B. Yoits]

If it’s not 100% auditable, it’s not an election. It’s something but it’s not an election.

[PMAS]

*

[TangoLimaSierra]

To me it means someone on the police side could theoretically access election board data and alter it. Not secure.

[thinden]

If it’s not 100% auditable, it’s not an election. It’s something but it’s not an election.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

how bout a selection?