Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

What? Someone that can comprehend better than I please read and explain.
1 posted on 07/07/2021 10:38:23 AM PDT by devane617
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: devane617

“What? Someone that can comprehend better than I please read and explain.”

The Air Force has publicly acknowledged that the felony conviction for domestic violence, had it been put into the FBI database, could have prevented Kelley from buying guns from licensed firearms dealers, and also from possessing body armor.


2 posted on 07/07/2021 10:41:03 AM PDT by TexasGator (UF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617
It wasn't the crazy,

Nor the gun,

Nor his parents,

Nor his upbringing,

It was the Air Force.

AIUI, I agree the AF SHOULD Have reported him.

3 posted on 07/07/2021 10:43:15 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Someone filed suit over the Church. Liability is based on what percentage of the damages were caused by each individual defendant’s fault. (Comparative fault). The court here decided the Air Force’s negligence was 60% the cause of the Plaintiff’s damages.


4 posted on 07/07/2021 10:44:29 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617
Translation #1: The anti-military Dims will rejoice because a judge blames the Air Force for the 2017 Texas shooting, because the Air Force didn't put into the database so that he'd be prevented from buying guns.


Translation #2: Those of us with sound minds will see it as no need for new gun laws. If the existing laws had been used he wouldn't have bought guns and done the shooting.

5 posted on 07/07/2021 10:45:23 AM PDT by Tell It Right (1st Thessalonians 5:21 -- Put everything to the test, hold fast to that which is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

I don’t understand this. I am told a gun purchaser will NOT pass muster if they are ex military and have anything other than an honorable discharge. This guy had a bad conduct discharge and yet passed the back round check?

Something smells here.


6 posted on 07/07/2021 10:45:47 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Paying out millions in a lawsuit against the federal government. It’s just government money so why not.


7 posted on 07/07/2021 10:45:59 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard (resist the narrative. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Nearly every mass shooter has had a history that should have nullified their firearm rights.

As gun owners, we support restricting the purchase of firearms from convicted felons.

But time and again, local, state and federal authorities do not update the database of felons to prevent such people from buying firearms legally.

Then, after the shootings, we must suffer the ignorant calls for more restrictions, confiscations and bans because those charged with ensuring public safety failed at their jobs.


8 posted on 07/07/2021 10:46:16 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (We are being played by forces most do not understand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Was anyone in the military deemed “responsible” for Nidal Hasan’s terrorist attack on Ft. Hood since his outburts and connect to foreign terror groups was known?


10 posted on 07/07/2021 10:47:26 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Lean on Joe Biden to follow Donald Trump's example and donate his annual salary to charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

This church shooting - with more than two dozen dead - has almost been forgotten, just like the murder of the Chicago cops by BLM and the Scalise shooting. All we ever hear about are Charlottesville and January 6th, over and over.


12 posted on 07/07/2021 10:48:41 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617
WHO groomed the shooter for his mission? Was NOT reporting his prior crime intentional so that he would be ABLE to do what he did?

Yeah, it gets THIS sick. EVIL people in high places.

14 posted on 07/07/2021 10:52:04 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

not sure why whoever works the data base..fbi? Isn’t more to blame?
Or, I guess the AF failed to provide the info?


15 posted on 07/07/2021 10:55:05 AM PDT by Leep (Save America. Lock down Joe Biden!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

The government imnposes the NICS system.

Another branch of governement fails to report to the system properly.

But the problem is the hunter in northern Wisconsin who uses an AR-15 to nail coyotes on his property. We need to go after that guy!


20 posted on 07/07/2021 11:01:08 AM PDT by Fido969 ( Sc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

What a bull-hit ruling by this judge. Yes, the AF did not put the individual in the data base, but being in the data base would not have prevented this individual from getting a gun on the street. Also, as the article states, being in the data base COULD have prevented him from buying a gun from an FFL but that is not a sure thing either, especially with the screwed up incompetent FBI we no have. The AF was wrong for not putting in the data base, but it is not responsible nor mostly responsibe for the acts of this guy. The individual is. Judge is an idiot


22 posted on 07/07/2021 11:03:55 AM PDT by falcon99 (qu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617
Background checks are a lazy man's solution to a problem. In this case the background check did not work. If it did work, there was little stopping him from illegally obtaining a weapon. It was not the weapon that caused the crime. It was the man. The only thing worse than the lazy man's solution is the leftist solution of banning and confiscating weapons.
23 posted on 07/07/2021 11:08:02 AM PDT by ConservativeInPA (“When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty.” ― Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Then the Army is 60% responsible for Nidal Hasan.


24 posted on 07/07/2021 11:10:26 AM PDT by TexasM1A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

“A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Air Force is mostly responsible for a former serviceman killing more than two dozen people at a Texas church in 2017 because it failed to submit his criminal history into a database, which should have prevented him from purchasing firearms.”

Sure, because if the gun store turns you down, there is just no other way to acquire a firearm.

That’s it; your criminal designs are thwarted. “Curses, foiled again.”


26 posted on 07/07/2021 11:13:24 AM PDT by dsc (Abortion is the axe laid to the roots of the tree of human rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Well, at least it wasn’t the gun’s fault.


30 posted on 07/07/2021 11:18:44 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Well, how silly of me to have thought it was the sicko who’s finger pulled the trigger was at fault.


32 posted on 07/07/2021 11:23:38 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

That’s the problem with these ‘databases”, they absolve others for their own actions.


34 posted on 07/07/2021 11:26:15 AM PDT by CodeToad (Arm up! They Have!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: devane617

Is this piece indicating that he was convicted by court martial? If so it’s my understanding that court martial convictions are considered Federal convictions in the same way that most Mafia convictions are considered. One would think that any such conviction would be put into the database.


38 posted on 07/07/2021 11:47:15 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Trump: "They're After You. I'm Just In The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson