Posted on 08/16/2021 7:25:14 AM PDT by george76
The University of South Carolina reversed its mask mandate after the state attorney general sent a letter to the school stating that their policy was against the law.
A state senator wrote a letter to the attorney general that alleged his actions were politically motivated.
On August 2, Alan Wilson, the SC Attorney General, tweeted a letter sent to USC President Harris Pastides. The letter interpreted a legislative proviso, or provision, which prohibits discriminatory mask mandates on South Carolina university and college campuses.
“The Legislature possesses the ultimate authority over health policy and has prohibited mandatory vaccinations and masking at schools and colleges, siding with a student’s liberty interests,” Wilson said in the letter.
Wilson concedes that the legislature could be interpreted to require a mask mandate for all students, but the university cannot force only unvaccinated students to wear masks.
“One reasonable interpretation is to prohibit discrimination by requiring masks for the unvaccinated,” he wrote.
USC reversed its previous mask mandate on Tuesday morning following the letter.
“In light of this...the university will not require anyone to wear face coverings in our buildings, except when in university health care facilities and when utilizing campus public transportation, effective August 3,” USC President Harris Pastides said in a statement to The State. “We continue to strongly encourage the use of face coverings indoors, except in private offices or residence hall rooms or while eating in campus dining facilities.”
On August 3 South Carolina Senator Dick Harpootlian, a Democrat, bashed Wilson in a two-page letter obtained by The State, claiming Wilson’s letter contained poor reasoning and was motivated by a political agenda.
“I disagree with your so-called legal analysis and I am concerned about your decision to needlessly insert yourself into the business of the university and the deleterious public health consequences that will follow,” Harpooltian stated.
“Based on my observation of your service as Attorney General, this type of activist, outcome-oriented reasoning calculated to further some political agenda or ambition is a hallmark of your tenure. Nevertheless, given the gravity of the matter, this episode is particularly offensive," he wrote. “I am disappointed but not surprised.”
According to The State, Wilson has asked the South Carolina Supreme Court to make a ruling on whether the University of South Carolina can implement a mask mandate.
The Supreme Court will soon decide whether or not to hear the case and could choose to hold a hearing in the near future. The suit points out that the issue is time-sensitive since students return to classes on Aug. 19.
When contacted for a comment, USC referred Campus Reform to an earlier statement posted on The State.
There’s only one USC and it ain’t in South Carolina.
What’s the lethal dose level for hypocrisy?
there are several USC in SC...
Of course HarPOOTlian had to chime in. Dope.
If you'd like to be on or off the South Carolina ping list, just click Private Reply below and drop me a FReepmail.
We call the one in SoCal the real USC.
USC was founded well before California was a state.
No it wasn’t. It was South Carolina College. And it closed in 1863. It didn’t finally, officially, become the University of South Carolina until 1905.
Hegelian Dialect in action.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.