Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biden’s Weakness Will Result In More Aggression Everywhere. Here Are 4 Likely Foreign Policy Scenarios
The Federalist ^ | 08/24/2021 | Morgan Wirthlin

Posted on 08/24/2021 11:04:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Even prior to the stunning display of American failure in Afghanistan, President Biden appeared slow-witted and spineless on crucial U.S. national security matters.

For example, Biden handed Russia’s Vladimir Putin gift after gift: extending the START Treaty, lifting Nord Stream 2 pipeline sanctions despite bipartisan legislation and essentially surrendering Ukraine to Russia. During the Biden-Putin summit in Geneva, Biden was tougher with an American journalist than with Putin. After Biden’s advisers and the first lady told the press how extensively he prepared for the meeting, he cut it short.

Biden also responded to the several major cyberattacks traced to Russia—including the meat processor JBS and the Colonial pipeline—by handing Putin a list of critical infrastructure that was “off limits.” Biden claimed Putin would change his behavior if his standing was diminished in the world, showing a fundamental lack of understanding Putin’s motivations.

Rejoining the 2015 nuclear agreement with Iran has been Biden’s top priority since taking office, and he was willing to offer Tehran almost anything for it. Tehran refused to negotiate with the United States directly, and operates with impunity in the Middle East.

In July, Iranian intelligence attempted to kidnap Masih Alinejad, an Iranian journalist, from American soil. In August, an Iranian drone attacked an Israeli merchant ship, killing two crew members. Iranian proxies targeted Americas in Syria and Iraq, and Hezbollah increased rocket attacks on Israel. It also appears Tehran attempted to close the Strait of Hormuz using sea mines.

In June, Biden proclaimed “America is back” with “renewed commitment to our allies and partners.” But North Atlantic Treaty Organization allies with troops on the ground in Afghanistan disagree as they scramble to get out their people out due to America’s hasty withdrawal. British paratroopers, prepared for face-to-face combat, have descended on Kabul to rescue British citizens.

Weakness invites aggression, so we should prepare for a tumultuous fall on the world stage. Here’s what to watch for.

1. An American Hostage Situation in Afghanistan

The Biden administration is not even aware of how many Americans are left in Afghanistan. It could be as many as 15,000. The administration canceled a Trump-era bureau overseeing protection and evacuation for American citizens in Afghanistan. Now Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin says the U.S. military does not have the capability to “go in and collect large numbers of people.”

President Obama ensured the Taliban understood the value of American hostages. In 2014, Obama released five Taliban commanders—one of whom is currently among Taliban leadership in Kabul—for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who later pled guilty to desertion and was dishonorably discharged. The abandoned Americans may be used for leverage, either by the Taliban or other extremist groups. What is unfolding in Afghanistan may make the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis may look tame by comparison.

2. A Fresh Terror Attack on 9/11

Jihadists are relishing the idea that the United States weak and can be defeated. The anniversary of the 9/11 attacks has always posed heightened risk of terrorism. On September 11, 2012, jihadists attacked a U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, killing Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. On August 13, DHS warned of a heightened risk from al-Qaeda, which released a new issue of its propaganda magazine Inspire for the first time in four years. The massive intelligence failure in Afghanistan does not inspire confidence in this administration’s ability to keep tabs on foreign terrorists.

The administration also appears utterly incapable of stopping foreign threats. The U.S. southern border is wide open. The president claims climate change is the greatest national security threat. Attorney General Merrick Garland says white supremacy is the greatest domestic threat.

The Justice Department has called the Capitol riot investigation one of the largest in American history, even as a Reuters report claims the FBI does not believe the riot was a conspiracy to overthrow the government. Still, those who did not engage in violence or destruction have been held in isolation for six months.

It is clear the Biden administration is distracted and incapable, making deterrence and prevention that much less likely.

3. A Possible Russian Offensive in Ukraine

As Center Senior Analyst Andrei Illarionov wrote in April, Putin was not ready for a large-scale invasion of Ukraine in the spring, but he would be ready by September. Putin may be able to extract concessions from Ukrainian President Zelensky that would negate need for an invasion.

If Putin decides to invade, however, it will likely be after the Zapad-2021 military exercises in mid-September. Military exercises can mask offensive operations, and Putin has used the tactic before.

4. Increased Chinese Pressure on Taiwan

Chinese state media taunted Taiwan after the fall of Kabul, claiming the United States would not come to Taiwan’s aid. Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen responded by saying: “Taiwan’s only option is to grow stronger and become more united, strengthening our determination to protect ourselves.” On August 17, China held live-fire air and sea exercises near Taiwan, and sent 11 war planes into Taiwanese airspace.

In March, America’s top military officer in the Indo-Pacific told Congress China could invade Taiwan in the next six years. The Washington establishment is confident the idea of an imminent risk to Taiwan is overblown, but as Center for Security Policy analyst Grant Newsham pointed out in June, the Chinese military regularly increases capabilities faster and better than western analysts assume.

In the wake of Afghanistan, Newsham wrote, Beijing is likely to challenge the United States in multiple ways. This could include confronting U.S. forces in the South China Sea, establishing bases in Africa and South America, intensify the assault on the U.S. dollar, and intensifying nuclear weapons buildup, to name a few.

In the non-Western world, might makes right. Biden’s rhetoric and proclaimed compassion is meaningless, as bad actors pay attention to action. Biden’s incompetence has made the world a more dangerous place.


Morgan Wirthlin is the chief of staff at the Center for Security Policy, a national security think-tank in Washington, D.C. Follow her @morganwirthlin on Twitter.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; aggression; weakness

1 posted on 08/24/2021 11:04:17 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He is not weak. Where was Harris this week? They are hiding behind weak and idiotic. Why do people think these people work for us?


2 posted on 08/24/2021 11:05:37 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How this is handled has been seen by the whole world. He has appeared weak all the way around. Distracting from the audits.


3 posted on 08/24/2021 11:09:03 AM PDT by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

But why would the Chinese want Taiwan now? They certainly don’t need it from a technological point of view.


4 posted on 08/24/2021 11:10:00 AM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

All 4 are now likely.


5 posted on 08/24/2021 11:10:27 AM PDT by 1Old Pro (Let's make crime illegal again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Does a bully ever stop wanting your lunch money?


6 posted on 08/24/2021 11:17:09 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

RE: But why would the Chinese want Taiwan now?

Same reason they could not wait to gobble up Hong Kong after they signed a 50 year autonomy agreement with the UK witnessed by the United Nations in 1997.


7 posted on 08/24/2021 11:17:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Harpotoo
Does a bully ever stop wanting your lunch money?

Yeah after he gets a stiff punch in the nose.

8 posted on 08/24/2021 11:18:32 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s not weak. It’s not dementia. It’s a willfull choice to do as the taliban has ordered. If he doesn’t, the chicoms will deliver their biden dossier to the media.

He is being controlled by them, and is willingly betraying his country. They own him. For that reason alone, he must be removed from office.


9 posted on 08/24/2021 11:32:29 AM PDT by I want the USA back (We have more to fear from our government than from the bug that the chicoms made for us. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88

Mao made taking back Taiwan a major goal for Red China - Taiwan has always been a sore spot with the Chi Comms - with Clueless Joe, they know it is ready to be picked off.


10 posted on 08/24/2021 11:45:03 AM PDT by EC Washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
It's already worked that way with domestic "law enforcement".
I just used "scare quotes" because we really only have policy enforcement at this point.
11 posted on 08/24/2021 11:55:47 AM PDT by Salman (It's not a "slippery slope" if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
But why would the Chinese want Taiwan now?

Because now they can. It was part of China before the Nationalists lost the mainland. Mao ultimately held fire (after some saber rattling) because he was realistic about the probable US response.

The ideal scenario (from a CCP point of view) would be to negotiate a Hong Kong style "one nation two systems" transition and no fighting.

12 posted on 08/24/2021 12:01:37 PM PDT by Salman (It's not a "slippery slope" if it was part of the program all along. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Another scenario—the Taliban could demand the release of all Guantanamo detainees in return for the hostages.


13 posted on 08/24/2021 12:42:14 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Here is something that works on my mind a lot...

If I had a child that was on drugs and obviously has a problem with cocaine, my #1 priority would be to build that wall. Stop as much illegal immigration that traffics in sex and drugs as is humanly possible. Tighten that border until it hurts. Why has Biden thrown it wide open? Who has done this?

14 posted on 08/24/2021 12:45:21 PM PDT by Bearshouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson