I knew the left would find a way to criticize this verdict, which proved false their claim that blacks are always found guilty in situations like this and that whites can kill blacks with impunity.
Is Carter complaining that it took too much time and effort to get the convictions? Did he not like the outcome? Did he think the defendants should have faced mob justice? What a tool.
Msnbc brain farts
Lots of hypothetical racism around these court cases.
A jury of 11 white people and only one black found ALL THREE defendants guilty.
Good gosh
SMH
If the races were reversed, the Black defendants would be free as a bird for killing a White career criminal.
MSNBC is really trying to get white people killed.
We just had a literal black serial killer get off scott free.
Glad they’re able to continue fommenting racism even though the verdict went their way. Would hate for them to run out of things to do.
Nobody ever mentions this one. A thug kills a white, old, retired fire chief in a carjacking and gets found not guilty. Not a hung jury; not guilty.
https://www.islandpacket.com/news/local/crime/article251701818.html
Representative Carter, and the owners of MSNBC STILL don’t get it. Namely, 60% of the American people are exhausted with Democratic Party whining about racism and they understand that it’s the only “issue” the marxist Demwit’s think they have.
Three white men, one armed with a gun, chased down and attacked a kid who was just trying to run away!
No, I’m not talking about the Arbery case, I am talking about the Rittenhouse case. Funny how the left does not see any similarities. All they can see is the race of the kid being chased.
Of course, there are differences between the cases. The men chasing Rittenhouse all had extensive criminal histories, including paedophile rape and violent attacks with deadly weapons. The men in the Arbery case had no criminal histories. The men chasing Rittenhouse were all fired up from an evening spent rioting and committing arson. The men in Arbery were a neighborhood watch group. The armed man chasing Rittenhouse was carrying a concealed gun illegally. The armed man chasing Arbery was legally carrying a shotgun.
Of course the biggest difference was that Rittenhouse was also armed and was able to defend himself before his armed attacker shot him.
They wouldn’t have been charged, if there was even an attempt to identify the perpetrators.
Poor widdle babies.
Absolutely SICK of these evil, racist, sonsabitches!!!!!!!!!!!!
Those charged in this Abery case got what they had coming to them. Not once have I heard anyone claim them guys were innocent. I hate it when people try to make molehills out of mountains.
Hypotheticals are useless.
Let’s be done with the race talk.
This is really more a case about political connections, conflicts of interests, and people’s lack of knowledge of the legal system than it ever was an issue of race.