wouldn’t be a bit surprised if it is true - but making claims 55 years later is absurd and indefensible - literally - how does one defend themselves against something that supposedly happened 55 years ago?
He is probably a leftist, so these claims will go nowhere, and will barely make it to the news - unlike Kavenaugh.
I don’t think he’s a leftist. He may not be either or. He’s said and done enough in the past, that he seems to subvert the notion he is some kind of rote leftist.