Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/07/2022 11:09:59 AM PST by Pollard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Pollard

Buffoons.


2 posted on 01/07/2022 11:11:55 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

Bump!


3 posted on 01/07/2022 11:13:11 AM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

They don’t care about facts.
They don’t care about the Constitution.

The court is trying to govern in a way which advances their political ideology.

That’s not what the Supreme Court is supposed to do, but [shrug] what are ya gonna do?


4 posted on 01/07/2022 11:13:21 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The experts are liars. The conspiracy theorists are the people who have figured out the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

5 posted on 01/07/2022 11:13:40 AM PST by Pollard (PureBlood -- youtube.com/watch?v=VXm0fkDituE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard
Smart? Nay! Political? Yes.


6 posted on 01/07/2022 11:13:52 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

A decision is expected soon? Like...when? Today, next week?


7 posted on 01/07/2022 11:14:00 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

We have always known that she was one of the dumbest people ever to be on the bench. This just is another example where that is reinforced.


8 posted on 01/07/2022 11:14:17 AM PST by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard
Hi, we're the woke Supreme Court! Yep, that's us!

9 posted on 01/07/2022 11:14:43 AM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

“Biden tasked OSHA with implementing and enforcing the mandates.”

Biden, “There is no federal solution to this.”

If Biden tasked it, then it is a federal mandate.
If there is no federal solution (as spoken by the executive that ordered it), why is this not part of the SCOTUS arguments?
“Admission against interest” is a REAL legal finding.


10 posted on 01/07/2022 11:15:13 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (This is NOT a pandemic of the unvaxx'd. It is a complete loss of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

It’s not shocking.
They are employees of Fedzilla put there to protect Fedzilla.


11 posted on 01/07/2022 11:15:39 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin ( (Natural born citizens are born here of citizen parents)(Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

Rational, decent Hispanics must be embarrassed and enraged that a blathering idiot such as Sotomayor was selected to be the “Hispanic” representative on the Supreme Court. She is unbelievably and hopelessly stupid.


13 posted on 01/07/2022 11:16:37 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

The narrative as of this morning is the vaccine was never intended to prevent the disease but only to minimize the symptoms once the disease has been contracted. The justice this morning said it was the best way to halt infections. The court appears to be a few days behind which, with the Wuhan virus, is light years.


14 posted on 01/07/2022 11:17:20 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard
... Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a number of false statements about the vaccine's ability to prevent transmission of the virus. While it may protect against death or hospitalization, the vaccine does not prevent transmission...

This is widely believed. I think TPTB specifically evade this question because it serves them well in vilifying the unvaxed. Just like the evasion of the natural immunity issue. People are genuinely confused because they've been purposefully confused.

15 posted on 01/07/2022 11:19:27 AM PST by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

wise latinas... is there anything they don’t know???


17 posted on 01/07/2022 11:19:54 AM PST by Chode (there is no fall back position, there's no rally point, there is no LZ... we're on our own. #FJB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

Shots destroy the natural immune system and make people more prone to get diseases.

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4006347/posts


18 posted on 01/07/2022 11:21:29 AM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

I wish someone would ask Fauci if the testing for emergency use contemplated multiple doses, as many as four or more?


19 posted on 01/07/2022 11:21:47 AM PST by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

Grounds for recusal.


20 posted on 01/07/2022 11:22:32 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

the script comes from Malta and the CCP.

the corrupt SCOTUS, Enemies of Honest Justices
and the Constitution, dare to impose taxes,
make up falsehoods, ignore their Oaths,
and target the People they were supposed to protect
as THEIR PROPERTY to be their owned ‘trans-Humans’.


21 posted on 01/07/2022 11:23:51 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard

Judges routinely admonish jurors to not consult outside sources for reaching their verdict. Appeal courts like the Supreme Court are bound by the evidence presented in the trial. Inserting their own opinions and blatantly erroneous misstatement of the facts surrounding the case as a basis for ruling is clear abuse of judicial authority.

Justices who won’t be bound by the evidence in the case record should voluntarily recuse themselves. If they don’t they should be impeached and removed from office. Removing Sotomayor for failing to recuse herself would give Biden the opportunity to rid himself of Harris by appointing her to replace the impeached Sotomayor.


23 posted on 01/07/2022 11:27:29 AM PST by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pollard
Welcome to Dystopia.


24 posted on 01/07/2022 11:28:36 AM PST by 444Flyer (John 3, Revelation 20, Joshua 24:15, 1 Kings 18:16-39, Pick a side...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson