Posted on 01/28/2022 12:40:07 PM PST by Jacquerie
The Nebraska legislature passed a resolution on Friday calling for an Article V convention of states, making it the 17th state to do so.
After considering it for the past year, the unicameral body approved the measure in a 32-11 vote, with six senators abstaining or absent. According to the resolution, the Nebraska legislature seeks to call a convention “limited to proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States that impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit the power and jurisdiction of the federal government, and limit the terms of office for its officials and for members of Congress.”
The application also comes with a five-year sunset clause, which notes that the legislature will rescind the measure by Feb. 1, 2027 if efforts to call a convention before then fail.
Under Article V of the U.S. Constitution, state legislatures are permitted to call a convention to propose amendments to the nation’s founding document without the approval of Congress. Two-thirds of states (34) are required for a convention to be called, with three-fourths of states (38) necessary for any amendment proposed to be ratified.
(Excerpt) Read more at thefederalist.com ...
Article V ping!
1/2 way there. 34 needed - 17 completed.
32-11
Kinda’ overwhelming.
YES!!!!!
Term limits!
PLEASE!!!!!!
Yes.
But the states have sent hundreds of applications.
Congress has not and will not willingly call a COS.
If this list is accurate, it is now 18 states because it doesn’t list South Dakota.
For a Convention of the States dedicated to Georgia’s application language, which would re-balance citizens’ rights versus federal power and state power, the count is 17 down, 17 to go.
For a Convention of the States dedicated to a balanced budget amendment only, the count is 30 down, 4 to go.
Can’t states call for it themselves if Congress chooses to not act?
***
The amendatory process under Article V consists of three steps:
Proposal:
There are two ways to propose an amendment to the Constitution.
Article V gives Congress and an amendments convention exactly the same power to propose amendments, except that a convention is limited to proposing amendments specified in the application and there is no such limit on Congress.
Direction:
Once Congress, or an amendments convention, proposes amendments, Congress must decide whether the states will ratify by the:
The state ratifying convention method has only been used once: to ratify the 21st Amendment repealing Prohibition. A similar procedure was used to ratify the Constitution itself.
Ratification:
Depending upon which ratification method is chosen by Congress, either the state legislatures vote up-or-down on the proposed amendment, or the voters elect a state ratifying convention to vote up-or-down. If three fourths of the states vote to ratify, the amendment becomes part of the Constitution.
Forbidden Subjects:
Article V contains two explicitly forbidden subjects and two implicitly forbidden subjects.
Explicitly forbidden:
Implicitly forbidden:
Reference work:
Proposing Constitutional Amendments by a Convention of the States: A Handbook for State Lawmakers
I would welcome a balanced budget amendment.
Preferably one that forces a timely reduction of the deficit and paydown of the debt.
Sounds great, but I don’t think they can limit it that way. Once a constitutional convention has “opened up” the Constitution, it’s possible for other interests to get in and propose all sorts of amendments.
Everybody needs to be very careful with this.
What would do the most good is repeal of the 17th amendment!
It’s also the least likely because it would demagogued to death by those mesmerized by the word democracy.
Article V doesn’t provide for the states calling a COS themselves.
In the event Congress doesn’t call a COS as it is constitutionally required, I’ve argued that the states should appeal to Scotus.
If Scotus gaffs off their responsibility, I say the states have the power and duty to do so.
Could end up by becoming a ‘divorce’ trial
Agree.
Democracy is poison . . . yet most are mesmerized as if it was perfume.
The 16th and 17th were the progressives’ first great victories. They enabled all the rot that followed.
It’s not a constitutional convention, it’s an Article V convention. It’s permitted in the Constitution as a way for the states to introduce amendments and bypass a noncooperating Senate. The amendments can either be accepted (2/3’rd) or rejected (not 2/3’rd) by the states. It’s not at all like the original convention because it’s done within the framework of the current Constitution. It’s just a different means of getting amendments proposed. My only worry is how do you keep the media from turning it into a circus.
.........this is really good news. We’re gaining on em!
nice...well it’s a start
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.