Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kyle Rittenhouse: The media tried to make me look guilty, 'put me in prison the rest of my life'
Just The News ^ | March 24 | By Natalia Mittelstadt

Posted on 03/24/2022 4:56:48 AM PDT by RandFan

Kyle Rittenhouse, the teenager who was acquitted in November of homicide charges following a self-defense shooting, slammed the media Wednesday for lying about him and trying to put him in prison.

Rittenhouse fatally shot two men in self-defense during an August 2020 riot in Kenosha, Wisc. The media claimed he was a white supremacist and a murderer, despite the lack of evidence.

"I'm angry that the media thinks they can get away with lying," Rittenhouse told "Just the News, Not Noise" cohosts John Solomon and Amanda Head.

"[L]ike Malcolm X said: 'The media is the most powerful entity on the planet. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and the guilty, innocent.' And they tried to do that to me. They lied, and they almost put me in prison the rest of my life. Thank God the jury didn't buy into the false narratives."

Rittenhouse has launched The Media Accountability Project, which is a fundraising effort to help him cover legal costs in his lawsuits against media companies who defamed him.

"The Media Accountability Project consists of two parts," he said. "And Part A is to hold the media accountable and make them pay for what they did."

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corporatemedia; corruptmedia; enemedia; kenosha; kylerittenhouse; mediabias; rittenhouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

1 posted on 03/24/2022 4:56:48 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan
I fully support Kyle Rittenhouse, but his lawsuits will ultimately fail against the media.

Kyle is no Nick Sandmann, because Kyle used deadly force, whereas Nick Sandmann just smiled.

Once criminal charges were filed against Kyle, that pretty much nullified any "malice" in reporting against him, because the media were allowed to opine on Kyle's guilt or innocence of the charges brought against the state.

2 posted on 03/24/2022 5:05:01 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

He shouldn’t have any trouble finding a lawyer who will take his lawsuit against the media on a contingency, which means the lawyer takes a percentage of whatever is recovered by settlement or judgment.


3 posted on 03/24/2022 5:08:18 AM PDT by Spok (Winston, how many fingers am I holding up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
...because the media were allowed to opine on Kyle's guilt or innocence of the charges brought against him by the state.
4 posted on 03/24/2022 5:09:29 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Time to watch “Citizen Kane” again.


5 posted on 03/24/2022 5:14:28 AM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
He may win a lawsuit based on claims he is a white supremacist before trial; He may win based on statements he is a murderer after he was cleared in a court of law.

The first possibility seems the more favorable.

6 posted on 03/24/2022 5:14:47 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

So, what you are saying is if you use your Constitutionally protected rights to survive, our enemedia can lie, AT WILL, about what actually transpired? They can call you a racist, without any actual proof (prejudicing public opinion and slandering your name)? They can lie and tell people you illegally carried a firearm over state lines (prejudicing public opinion and slandering your name)?

If this is true then we, as a people, would be better off letting ourselves get killed in similar instances than be willfully destroyed by our enemedia.

I’m not against you or trying to start an argument, I am simply saying our system of justice is flawed, EXTREMELY FLAWED, if our enemedia is allowed to get away with what they attempted to do to Kyle Rittenhouse. And if our laws ALLOW our enemedia to get away with this, then we need to change the laws!


7 posted on 03/24/2022 5:16:43 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (Diversity is necessary; diverse points of views will not be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Sadly, you are probably right. However, he might be able to bring a bright spotlight on the media by forcing discovery on them. In that regards, I think he has a chance to be successful and the effort will be worth it. If he can further show the media to be the lying, Democrat narrative writers that they are, then he will have succeeded. A slow drip can destroy the stiffest wall.


8 posted on 03/24/2022 5:24:45 AM PDT by silent majority rising ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

I knew that the left was determined to throw KR in jail when I saw that the social media were censoring anyone who “liked” a posting favorable to him.

The media works very closely with the power behind the democrat party - the ones who are not in the news every day, but who direct operations.


9 posted on 03/24/2022 5:26:47 AM PDT by I want the USA back (Government is to be feared much more than the chicom virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
After he makes his millions, he should run for Mayor of Kenosha ---> Guvner ---> president


10 posted on 03/24/2022 5:28:38 AM PDT by Kevmo (Give back Ukes their Nukes https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/4044080/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

They will ALL settle for massive quantites of cash.

the last thing the media wants is to be paraded under oath in front of judge and cameras. Possibly having to report on it.

And Ultimate last thing they want is a judgement/ precedent set in a real court.

It may be interesting in suits against individuals if their corp lawyers don’t jump in.


11 posted on 03/24/2022 5:32:47 AM PDT by uranium penguin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: uranium penguin

AND all settlements will be made with confidentiality agreements so the actual amount will never be known..


12 posted on 03/24/2022 5:43:32 AM PDT by GeorgiaDawg32
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
Malcolm X said: 'The media is the most powerful entity on the planet.

The media have ONLY the power that the people GIVE TO THEM.

How to break their hold on the American psyche? TURN OFF THE TV. Wean off the Internet. Even bit-by-bit is better than nothing.

But that would take effort.

13 posted on 03/24/2022 6:42:39 AM PDT by AFB-XYZ (Stand up, or bend over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgiaDawg32

Interesting thought...

Assuming KR sues Both the Companies AND individuals.

I could see CNN (espeically) defending itself on the corp level. Meaning, a large out of court settlement with some sort of NDA.

BUT, They may very well have seen this on the horizon already. And may be letting their “personalities” fend for themselves and NOT provide corporate lawyers.

This could be an easy way to clean house at CNN. And possibly, get out of a LOT of high $$ contracts. With no blow back on them.


14 posted on 03/24/2022 6:45:06 AM PDT by uranium penguin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marktwain; ExTxMarine; silent majority rising
I base my opinions on what Robert Barnes, one time Kyle Rittenhouse lawyer, has said vis-a-vis Kyle's chances for defamation lawsuits: https://youtu.be/Rf3ov5yYNb4?t=3175

Barnes says that Kyle's mom has a much stronger defamation case than Kyle: https://youtu.be/4R2wV6zqPDo?t=831

(Both video clips are cued up to the pertinent spots to save your time, but you can also listen to the entire Viva Frei podcast if desired.)

15 posted on 03/24/2022 6:55:39 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Nick Sandman was able to win against media outlets for repeatedly misrepresenting what happened to him in DC. I know Sandman and Rittenhouse have discussed these lawsuits.

If it can be shown media outlets continued to make false claims about Kyle when the facts were available to the public and reporters, Kyle's case has merit.

16 posted on 03/24/2022 7:57:56 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Hey Kyle, it wasn’t just the media that tried to,do,that, it was black lives matter too, which I understand you support?


17 posted on 03/24/2022 8:00:41 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

What’s the deal with his gun? I saw a story the other day that the police shredded it.

The gun should’ve been returned to him on the day he was found to be not guilty.


18 posted on 03/24/2022 8:26:24 AM PDT by libertylover (Our BIGGEST problem, by far, is that most of the media is hate & agenda driven, not truth driven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
If it can be shown media outlets continued to make false claims about Kyle when the facts were available to the public and reporters, Kyle's case has merit

I am assuming that you didn't listen to the two Barnes video clips I posted earlier in post 15 of this thread, and I don't blame you if you hadn't.

Barnes' point wasn't that a defamation case wouldn't have merit, but that it would be difficult to prove more damages to Kyle's reputation from the defamation than the state had already caused by charging him and putting him through a trial, and that a court would probably dismiss a defamation case at some point in the proceedings because of it.

He also states that Kyle's mother Wendy has a much better case, because she was never charged or tried in court, so damage to her reputation would more easily proved. (Second video clip I posted.)

19 posted on 03/24/2022 8:32:53 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: libertylover
What’s the deal with his gun? I saw a story the other day that the police shredded it.

The gun should’ve been returned to him on the day he was found to be not guilty.

The gun didn't belong to Kyle when it was confiscated, it belonged to his buddy Dominic Black who bought it.

Regardless, it was Kyle's wishes that the gun be destroyed.

20 posted on 03/24/2022 8:34:54 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson