She’s a porn judge, Al.
GOP Didn’t Have ‘Enough Humanity’ to Say KJB Vote ‘DEMONIC’
Al’s a racist, and this just goes to prove it.
No. I think all of us think this appointment is historic. Historically evil, but definitely historic.
this from Sharpton, the tax cheat? The charlatan ‘preacher’?
That Sharpton?
OK.
Yeah Al, we all know how much you ‘exude’ humanity. Almost as much as you exude poisonous methane.
“Historic” = A completely and thoroughly unqualified individual appointed by an illegal regime, confirmed by an illegal Senate occupied by several members not legally elected, all due to their ethnicity and gender.
Historically bad, historically unjust, and historically evil.
Yup, Al, definitely “historic.”
Has fat boy paid all his back taxes and penalties yet?
I will say it, it is historic that someone who openly states she does not believe in the founding principles and documents of this Republic still was confirmed.
Not exactly a good thing.
Hey Rev, it was absolutely “historic”. The court has three Supreme Court Activists that identify as “women”. We have the first activist that cannot even define what a woman is!
I am not a biologist.
More crying from the crying gallery, huh? Where is Je$$e Jackson?
Well, it's going to be historic alright.. It' going to be an absolute train-wreck.. A disaster of the highest order in regards to our constitution..
Oh it’s ‘historic’ alright - an historic Constitutional travesty.
FU Sharpton, you race pimping piece of dung.
She’s a mediocre intellect whose main function will be to play slapjack with Sotomayor while the adults in the room are discussing the law.
Hardly historic.
I’ll say it, “easy on pedophelia” is historic in an appointee.
The first disney SCOTUS justice.
How can the “First Black Woman Supreme Court Justice” be historic, when she can’t even determine what a woman is?
Sharpton said, “As great as it is today, for black women, for women, and for black people, we all couldn’t celebrate that together. They didn’t even have enough humanity to say this is historic. I think that that is very telling. and she comes on the bench in a divided time, giving hope to people that’s going to have to fight those divisions.”
Divided time? This statement sums up Sharpton, and a number of failing politicians in the public domain. It’s been a long time since there was a call for equality. This is not one of them. Why does it have to be a great event for black people, especially black women? Why can’t it be a celebration of the success of a great justice period. Laws should see no color, religion or gender. They should see justice. So while Sharpton is celebrating the lack of humanity of one piece of our government that actually approved her entry, he is using the action as an attack on other than black people in the US, especially women.
She’s there to do a job based upon a Constitution written in the 1780’s for the use of all in this country not to represent black America or women. If that is her actual determination of her job then she’s starting with a conflict of interest that should disqualify her to judge any case that involves blacks or women and recuse. Not much of a well planned justice replacement was it?
wy69
It’s historic alright. It’s the first time an apologist for Pedophiles was confirmed to sit on the highest court in the land. Her and John Roberts ought to get along very well.