non sequitur
These aren’t “conservatives” - they’re RINOs at best and Democrat plants at worst.
Trust the Bulwark at your own risk.
Conversion or infiltration?
I do not believe that homosexuals are outnumbering conservatives in the so-called political right. However, I do believe that populists are beginning to outnumber social conservatives. Or, at the least, they are using bigger microphones. That might change at some point. Populists are easily swayed. Social conservatives are not.
No.
Love the Sinner.
Hate the Sin.
The Constitution is not a religious document.
Support it, and we’re friends.
Republicans always used Christians for votes but never delivered on much.
yes, they are, and if you act like a Christian in the GOP and say homosexuality is sin, you are called a hater.
Trump even placed a gay man in the cabinet, Grenell.
I told you guys, it was about his personal morality.
The Bulwark is nor conservative, it’s Bush League.
I think conservatism is drawing people from all demographics.
It’s why Deep State has to steal elections.
The traditional view of Rockefeller Republicans toward social conservatives is that they want their votes but not their values. Social conservatives have long been the red-headed stepchildren of the Republican Party.
When you embrace homosexuality, you lay upon yourself and your nation a curse.
People who advocate for the demonic practice are cursed.
A true conservative would never align with that group.
You might as well align with Jihadists and Commie usurpers.
Infiltration to change it.
Anyone see what Milo is now up to? Yikes.
Austin Ruse is a Catholic and knows that the Lord is the King and He knows we don’t want weak, psycho, and effeminate leaders who reject the Lord. History: in the year 1064 Greece was controlled by weak, psycho and effeminate leaders and then the citizens were driven into slavery by the Persians.
Assistant Democrats is all they are. They’re definitely not conservatives.
I didn’t get any memo saying I’ve been replaced.
Mail’s been slow, granted...
Aside from the fact that it’s not smart to be homosexual (especially from a life-span perspective), there are many homosexuals that have a high IQ. They are also creative, motivated, hyper-focused and often wealthy. I think part of this is due to a) being wired differently and b) not having to devote mental/emotional resources to a wife and family. If you can get them to direct their energy toward your side, it can be an asset. If they are on the other side, it can be a detriment.
I have worked with some homosexuals. They can be charming and intelligent people. We get along fine as long as they don’t try to evangelize their lifestyle (which I do find disgusting). Luckily, almost none of the ones I’ve worked with do that.
Are Commies replacing Christians in he Democrap Party?