Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/28/2022 9:06:56 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: MinorityRepublican

We will not comply.
Your cops are so bad they can’t even save
some kids in a school and you think you
Are going to disarm us?
You are idiots.


39 posted on 05/28/2022 10:10:10 PM PDT by rellic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Repeal one of the Bill of Rights Mr. Pedophile and watch what happens.


42 posted on 05/28/2022 10:18:25 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Don't blame me, I voted for President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

We had a revolution about this, the anti-firearm group lost big.

They want to try again?


43 posted on 05/28/2022 10:24:57 PM PDT by doorgunner69 (Let's go Brandon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

You really want to end gun violence? Have an investigation and find out which DNC RAT is orchestrating these mass shootings at the kids in school. You’d never see a piece of human excrement like Salazar walk into a bar and try to pull this crap. He’d be toast 5 seconds after he comes through the door. It’s too bad the jackass Nazis screaming for gun confiscation don’t stand up to save the millions of infants that their pals murder every year. HYPOCRITES!!!


44 posted on 05/28/2022 10:28:15 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Don't blame me, I voted for President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

A Well Regulated Militia?
Lost in the gun rights debate, much to the detriment of American freedom, is the fact that the Second Amendment is in fact an “AMENDMENT”. No “Articles in Amendment” to the Constitution, more commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights, stand alone and each can only be properly understood with reference to what it is that each Article in Amendment amended in the body of the original Constitution. It should not be new knowledge to any American the Constitution was first submitted to Congress on September 17, 1787 WITHOUT ANY AMENDMENTS. After much debate, it was determined that the States would not adopt the Constitution as originally submitted until “further declamatory and restrictive clauses should be added” “in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its (the Constitutions) powers”. (This quote is from the Preamble to the Amendments, which was adopted along with the Amendments but is mysteriously missing from nearly all modern copies.) The first ten Amendments were not ratified and added to the Constitution until December 15, 1791.

In this Light: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” What provisions of the original Constitution is it that the Second Amendment is designed to “amended”? THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS AMENDING THE PROVISIONS IN THE ORIGINAL CONSTITUTION APPLYING TO THE “MILITIA”. The States were not satisfied with the powers granted to the “militia” as defined in the original Constitution and required an amendment to “prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers. “(Again quoting from the Preamble to the Amendments.)

What was it about the original Constitutional provisions concerning the “Militia” that was so offensive to the States?

First understand that the word “militia” was used with more than one meaning at the time of the penning of the Constitution. One popular definition used then was one often quoted today, that the “Militia” was every able bodied man owning a gun. As true as this definition is, it only confuses the meaning of the word “militia” as used in the original Constitution that required the Second Amendment to correct. The only definition of “Militia” that had any meaning to the States demanding Amendments is the definition used in the original Constitution. What offended the States then should offend “People” today: “Militia” in the original Constitution as amended by the Second Amendment is first found in Article 1, Section 8, clause 15, where Congress is granted the power: “To provide for the calling forth the MILITIA to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrection and repel Invasions.” Article 1, Section 8, Clause 16 further empowers Congress: “To provide for the organizing, arming, and disciplining, the MILITIA, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;” Any “patriot” out there still want to be called a member of the “MILITIA” as defined by the original Constitution? Article 2, Section 2, Clause 1 empowers: “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the MILITIA of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States;” The only way the States would accept the “MILITIA” as defined in the original Constitution was that the Federal “MILITIA” be “WELL REGULATED”.

The States realized that “THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE” required that the “MILITIA” as originally created in the Constitution be “WELL REGULATED” by a “restrictive clause.” How did the States decide to insure that the Constitutional “MILITIA” be “WELL REGULATED”? By demanding that “restrictive clause two” better know as the “Second Amendment” be added to the original Constitution providing: “THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” The States knew that “PEOPLE” with “ARMS” would “WELL REGULATE” the Federal “MILITIA”! Now read for the first time with the full brightness of the Light of truth: “A WELL REGULATED MILITIA, BEING NECESSARY TO THE SECURITY OF A FREE STATE, THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.” For those still overcome by propaganda: The Second Amendment declares by implication that if the “MILITIA” is not “WELL REGULATED” by “PEOPLE” keeping and bearing arms, the “MILITIA” becomes a threat to the “SECURITY OF A FREE STATE.” The “MILITIA” has no “RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS” in the Second Amendment, rather it is only “THE RIGHT OF THE “”PEOPLE”” TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS (that) SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.”


46 posted on 05/28/2022 10:30:21 PM PDT by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
Stevens said the amendment was adopted out of concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the states. “Today that concern is a relic of the 18th century,” he wrote.

The amendment was there to add a delineated boost to the natural right of man to self-defense (since the 10A wasn't clear enough on the issue), and is supposed to be more of a barrier to government goons posing a threat to the people.
47 posted on 05/28/2022 10:30:34 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Remember that imbecile was put forth by Nixon. If Republicans had actually nominated conservative justices consistently there would be no homo marriage, late term abortion, affirmative action and other societal depravities that have been invented by the left.


49 posted on 05/28/2022 10:35:48 PM PDT by Dragonspirit (CNN is the enemy. Ashli Babbitt is the hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

when will anyone point out the obvious timing and wonder what they did to spin up these people into becoming shooters


51 posted on 05/28/2022 10:57:23 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

These types of people absolutely are internal enemies of the Republic.


53 posted on 05/29/2022 12:09:09 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican
Stevens said the amendment was adopted out of concern that a national standing army might pose a threat to the security of the states. “Today that concern is a relic of the 18th century,” he wrote.

Nothing could be CLOSER to actuality in this 21st Century. This government's standing army of administration-controlled agencies, departments, bureaus and, yes, even the upper echelon of the military ARE a threat to the security of this country.

54 posted on 05/29/2022 12:20:31 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

1 million were killed in Rwanda with machetes.


55 posted on 05/29/2022 12:39:53 AM PDT by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

See my tagline, folks. Leftists will never stop. There goal is total submission of their enemies which includes killing as many of us as they can.

They will now start attacking and killing us (again) under the guise that they are doing it to “protect” the world. And, as always, the police forces where ever these democrat party solders attack, will “stand down” and let the democrat brown shirts loot, burn, assault and even murder with no consequence.

One needs to go no further than the leftist who murdered the Trump supporting in Colorado, with it on video, who had the charges dropped and is now free.

https://kdvr.com/news/local/lawyer-charges-dropped-against-unlicensed-security-guard-who-shot-man-at-rally/


57 posted on 05/29/2022 2:08:55 AM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

That would be the honest way to do it. Not by legislation or executive order


58 posted on 05/29/2022 2:21:21 AM PDT by RonnG ('')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Its perfectly fine to feel that way.....so long as a judge does not take the position that they can rule however they personally feel like.

There is a means the Founding Fathers provided to amend the constitution. 2/3rds, 2/3rds and 3/4ths. Get that and you can repeal the 2nd Amendment. Go ahead. Convince enough of your fellow citizens as to the rightness of your cause.

If you can’t get that, then you don’t get what you want. Its as simple as that.


61 posted on 05/29/2022 2:36:03 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Repeal the Second Amendment = Instant Civil War


63 posted on 05/29/2022 2:48:02 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (We are being manipulated by forces that most do not see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

The far left Wapo uses a far left, hack former justice for a propaganda story aimed at taking the rights of the people it hates. Such a surprise.


67 posted on 05/29/2022 3:18:11 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

Let teachers defend themselves and the children they are teaching. If that doesn’t work, abolish the public schools.


68 posted on 05/29/2022 3:29:37 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

The leftist endgame is confiscation.

Yet, you will not see Mayor Beetlejuice walking into West Garfield locked arm in arm with Durbin, Duckworth and Danny Davis knocking on doors with the intent of confiscating those weapons.

You won’t see Pelosi and Breed out knocking on doors in Bayview.

They don’t care about crime, they care about squashing political opposition.


69 posted on 05/29/2022 3:32:35 AM PDT by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

The long term solution to reducing mass crimes of hate is to eliminate the teaching of hate and resentment as a political strategy by the democrats.

The way to do that is to outlaw and eliminate the democrat party.


71 posted on 05/29/2022 3:42:26 AM PDT by Iron Munro ( Joe Biden - Inventor Of The First New Language since Esperanto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MinorityRepublican

” Gun violence is a national health crisis “ That’s coming next, they’ve already told us.


72 posted on 05/29/2022 3:42:32 AM PDT by saturn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson