[subterfuge]

Who’s representing PV, Lionel Hutz, the attorney from the Simpson’s?

[Fai Mao]

A $120k award is nothing

[Signalman]

Jurors in Washington...

[rlmorel]

"...A federal jury has found Project Veritas, a conservative group often accused of using deceptive tactics..."

Filthy Leftists, every single one of them. All of them. A monkeypox on every single one of them.

Lets not focus on the fact that they bragged about sending mentally ill people and union thugs to conservative events to stir up violence, which is (IIRC) what they found in THAT event. I despise these people that Veritas infiltrated.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Americans can’t win in the courts in this country. It’s ignorant to even try.

[OneVike]

Will be overturned, especially if they keep taking hot until the SC hears it. These judges on lower courts are allowing anything without holding back, but limiting the defendants like PV their right to a fair defense.

This will be appealed and eventually over turned.

Yet the left could care less if it is, it is the optics and the ability to uses the verdict to scare others from doing what PV does.

[Jacquerie]

Gee, no mention of Hillary paying Robert Creamer to hire union thugs to beat up Trump supporters at his rallies.

[Red Badger]

Jurors in Washington ..............................

[Sequoyah101]

The only person they can find peers for in a DC jury is Stepin Fetchit.

[navysealdad]

Dems and Deep State always win sadly..

[DoughtyOne]

The firm and Creamer said Project Veritas used "heavily
edited" footage in videos that falsely suggested they
conspired to incite violence at then-Republican candidate
Donald Trump's rallies and schemed to promote voter fraud.

The heavily edited video was sliced up as a clip and
delivered to the public, because it contained the
infraction.

Why should they show a half hour clip that didn't
exonerate the culprits.

D. C. Juries are a disaster waiting to happen.

They could charge Trump with anything they liked, and get
a conviction there.

[dadfly]

James is already appealing. no worries. go Project Veritas!

[DoughtyOne]

Hypothetical example only:

If a video was 15 minutes long, and only 30 seconds of it
showed a person shooting a business owner, his attorney
would say it was heavily edited to show a very biased
untruth.

A D.C. jury would vote not guilty.

[WKUHilltopper]

You all have faith in the ‘legal’ system?

[DiogenesLamp]

Jurors in Washington...

DC should not be permitted to have any local courts. DC is a cesspool of liars and government sycophants, and any case tried there is automatically garbage.

[hanamizu]

Project Veritas used “heavily edited” footage in videos

---

A couple of years ago when Planned Parenthood officials were recorded bragging about selling baby body parts, the local news always referred to the clips as “heavily edited” as if what we were seeing with our own eyes and hearing with our own ears wasn’t real.

[BitWielder1]

But it's OK for FBI to infiltrate an organization and not only observe but to encourage and facilitate illegal activities?

[The Old Hoosier]

I can’t imagine this verdict surviving the appeal. It would be devastating for anyone who does undercover journalism investigations.

[ifinnegan]

“Jurors in Washington on Thursday awarded $120,000”

That wouldn’t even cover a fraction of legal fees.

Clearly there were no damages and this is a type of show trial.

[ronnie raygun]

Laws are for conservatives rats go free