Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PayPal Updates User Policy to Include Possible $2,500 Fine For Speech It Doesn’t Like
Legal Insurrection ^ | 10-6-2022 | Stacey Matthews

Posted on 10/06/2022 7:30:43 AM PDT by servo1969

It's no big secret that Big Tech's tentacles have a vast reach, with platforms like Facebook and Twitter admitting in so many words after the fact to deliberately suppressing news content prior to the 2020 presidential election that portrayed then-Democratic nominee for president Joe Biden and his international wheelin' and dealin' son Hunter in a less than flattering light being one of the more notable examples.

But as has already been made clear by online payment systems like PayPal and Venmo, even more silencing of alternative points of view is needed in the form of financial strangulation if necessary, which can occur via shutting down accounts entirely or, in PayPal's case, will soon also potentially include $2,500 fines for WrongThink, according to a recently updated acceptable use policy set to take effect in November.

As reported by Reclaim the Net:

PayPal's clause about taking users' funds for a violation of its rules has long been established. But, as published on September 26th and to be effective on November 3rd, 2022, PayPal will add restrictions to its acceptable use policy that go beyond illegal activities and fraud and into the realm of policing speech.

The updated policy prohibits users from using PayPal for activities that:

"Involve the sending, posting, or publication of any messages, content, or materials that, in PayPal's sole discretion, (a) are harmful, obscene, harassing, or objectionable ... (e) depict, promote, or incite hatred or discrimination of protected groups or of individuals or groups based on protected characteristics (e.g. race, religion, gender or gender identity, sexual orientation, etc.) ... (g) are fraudulent, promote misinformation ... or (i) are otherwise unfit for publication."

Big Tech platforms are increasingly finding ways to punish people's speech under the guise of banning 🛡 "misinformation," and making themselves as the arbiters of truth in deciding what is and isn't true.

Yep, and in PayPal's case, they specifically state that they can fine users $2,500 for alleged "misinformation" and supposed hate speech.

"Violation of this Acceptable Use Policy constitutes a violation of the PayPal User Agreement and may subject you to damages, including liquidated damages of $2,500.00 U.S. dollars per violation, which may be debited directly from your PayPal account(s)," the new policy reads.

As Fire.org also noted, PayPal has been under fire in the U.K. in recent weeks for what critics called viewpoint-based discrimination against users:

Two weeks ago, PayPal shuttered the account of the Free Speech Union, a London-based organization founded by social commentator Toby Young to advocate for free expression. PayPal also closed Young's personal account and that of his news and opinion website, The Daily Sceptic.

On Tuesday, PayPal reinstated the accounts, but only after sustained public criticism of the company's apparently viewpoint-discriminatory actions.

[...]

In typically murky fashion, PayPal initially gave Young no reason for the bans other than to say that the accounts violated the company's vague acceptable use policy. However, a PayPal spokesperson told the press, "Achieving the balance between protecting the ideals of tolerance, diversity and respect for people of all backgrounds and upholding the values of free expression and open dialogue can be difficult, but we do our best to achieve it." Other reports indicate PayPal's decision to close the accounts had to do with alleged COVID-19 misinformation.

Gosh, this all sounds nauseatingly familiar, doesn't it?

What's especially horrid about how PayPal operates beyond being able to yank $2,500 from your account because you posted something they disagree with is that there typically is no advance warning and no appeals process. It just happens and you have very little recourse, as GetPayment explained:

PayPal creates their own Acceptable Use Policy, which effectively allows them to play by their own rules. Their payment processing services are unregulated compared to full-service merchant services providers. That means merchants have no legal recourse to resolve these issues or get their funds reimbursed.

To make matters worse, there is no defined appeals process. They can ban you without warning, potentially without allowing you to cash out your account balance for six months. Plus, they can fine you multiple times to deplete your balance--and there's not much you can do to stop them.

As to how to fight back against such Orwellian tactics? Getting even louder is, of course, a big reason why Big Tech operations like PayPal put such policies in place, to begin with.

While there are some viable alternatives to PayPal, their partnerships with financial institutions can mean the service providers and users possibly being subjected to woke ESG standards and summarily canceled as a result, which Republican governors like Florida's Ron DeSantis are trying to stop.

Still, they are worth exploring for anyone concerned with PayPal's increasing overreach and control over what its users say on their websites.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: bigtech; classactionlawsuit; fine; freespeech; internet; paypal; policy; speech; suepaypal; technofascism; technotyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter.
1 posted on 10/06/2022 7:30:43 AM PDT by servo1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I just closed my paypal account (I only ever used it for the occasional purchase on Ebay) and told them exactly why I was closing my account.


2 posted on 10/06/2022 7:34:43 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I’m so glad I don’t need PayPal to supply my living income.
I seldom use it, less now than years ago.
My card has been hacked/stolen twice before via PayPal.
Not sure how secure their system is.
I only use it now as a last resort.


3 posted on 10/06/2022 7:35:17 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FLT-bird

I never trusted it in the first place.


4 posted on 10/06/2022 7:38:23 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I ditched PayPal when, in my opinion, they tried to rip me off for several hundred dollars. They were not able to seize my money and when they threatened me I told them to FO and never used them again.


5 posted on 10/06/2022 7:38:23 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

Blackrock now controls most corporate decisions.


6 posted on 10/06/2022 7:38:27 AM PDT by Don Corleone (leave the gun, take the canolis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

This is written in a way that even if you just have an account, they can fine you $2,500 if a post or text message comes to their attention.

This is illegal.


7 posted on 10/06/2022 7:38:58 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

I’m not quite sure WHERE one would violate Paypal’s “policy”, considering it’s not a social media platform.

Are they tied to Facebook/Twitter etc???

Is Paypal spying on it’s customers?

WHERE are they talking about “posting” objectional material?


8 posted on 10/06/2022 7:40:30 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
"While there are some viable alternatives to PayPal"

Some? SOME?

If eBay ever kicked PayPal off that platform, they'd fold.
9 posted on 10/06/2022 7:44:18 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

it sounds like PayPal should be avoided. If you do anything to offend their liberal sensibilities, they can just seize your money?


10 posted on 10/06/2022 7:49:06 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

PayPal is owned by Wells Fargo, no?

This should be the cause of a massive boycott.


11 posted on 10/06/2022 7:49:08 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Safrguns

Maybe they mean something like using pay pal when selling a tee shirt with something on it that they object to ?????


12 posted on 10/06/2022 7:49:10 AM PDT by Apple Pan Dowdy (... as American as Apple Pie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

SO..... If I send money via pay-pal to promote an anti-abortion organization, or even a church that sponsors gender identity rehab, or a politician who speaks out against homosexuality, then Pay-Pal can fine me?

Did I get that right?


13 posted on 10/06/2022 7:51:33 AM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

Was disappointed to see paypal still listed as a payment option when supporting this quarter’s freepathon last week.

Given this new policy, it seems anyone supporting this site via paypal may be putting their balance at risk.

All here are haters, after all.


14 posted on 10/06/2022 7:59:39 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down seven times, stand up eight. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969

You have to use your head when dealing with these people.
I’ve bought Flare guns with Pay-pal(they shut down anything that looks like a gun).
I’ve purchased all sorts of Pay-pay forbidden things and I haven’t lost a cent.
It does require an ethical person with whom you are doing business with, but crooks get noticed quickly and are usually out of business even quicker.
I haven’t been burned yet.


15 posted on 10/06/2022 8:01:48 AM PDT by rellic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969
As to how to fight back against such Orwellian tactics?

Just sue them in small claims court. They have no authority to seize anyone's property. Their terms of use is not a law its just their opinion.

16 posted on 10/06/2022 8:13:44 AM PDT by usurper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servo1969; Jim Robinson

I think Free Republic might want to reconsider using Pay Pal to collect donations.


17 posted on 10/06/2022 8:16:14 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (I got the <ΙΧΘΥΣ>< variant. Catch it. John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

As to illegality, most of BeijingBiden’s activities are, too. But, that no longer matters.

PayPal will re-define improper speech any time it needs a $$ influx. Convenient.

Surely no one parks $$ in a PayPal account?


18 posted on 10/06/2022 8:18:40 AM PDT by bobbo666 (Baizuo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StAnDeliver

On July 1, 2015, PayPal announced that it was acquiring digital money transfer company Xoom Corporation.


19 posted on 10/06/2022 8:18:45 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rellic

But they know who you are and where you live. They could report you to the FBI.


20 posted on 10/06/2022 8:19:12 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (I got the <ΙΧΘΥΣ>< variant. Catch it. John 3:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson