Posted on 10/09/2022 8:13:36 AM PDT by Salohcin
As for the economic aspect of Putin's mobilization, most commentators focus on the disastrous consequences for the skilled labor market and the loss of jobs by companies. This is all true: for example, back in July Putin admitted at a meeting with his ministers that a shortage of a million skilled workers is expected in the IT industry alone over the next two years, and now it is clear that this shortage will only get worse.
According to a Rosstat survey of entrepreneurs, the lack of qualified workers is one of the top 5 factors limiting industrial production growth, and the importance of this problem in 2022 has increased. Mobilization poses the most unexpected threats, particularly with regard to the attempts to circumvent Western sanctions: for example, it affects small companies that specialize in complex schemes of parallel imports.
But the magnitude of the impact of mobilization on the skilled labor market has yet to be assessed; for now, we can only guess. But what has now become abundantly clear is that Putin will not have sufficient budget to maintain, equip, and supply the newly mobilized troops.
This is clear from the document titled, “Basic Trends in Budget, Taxation, and Customs Tariff Policy for 2023-2025,” obtained by Vedomosti. This document, for the first time, allows us to see the scale of the increase in military spending in connection with Putin's aggression against Ukraine. Its main conclusion is hard-hitting: Putin will not have enough money for further financing of the war and mobilization. All of his efforts are doomed, primarily financially.
What does the document say? That military spending in 2022-2024 (the government does not have plans for a later period, and we want to believe that a different government will be deciding this question in the future) is supposed to increase from the previously approved about 3 trillion rubles per year to about 5 trillion rubles per year (by a total of 3.4 trillion over three years, from 2022 to 2024 inclusive).
This is absolutely insufficient even to finance the current war - not to mention the cost of mobilizing a few hundred thousand additional manpower. We don't know how many Russians will be ultimately drafted as part of the mobilization - maybe the declared 300,000, maybe more or less. But relatively speaking, this is a force comparable to the current number of contract servicemen announced by Shoigu (the Russian Defense Ministry talked about 400,000 contract servicemen).
To put it simply, according to the peacetime military budget approved earlier, of the 3.5 trillion rubles approximately 1.2-1.5 trillion rubles was spent on maintaining the army itself (salaries and supplies) (the rest was spent on military industrial complex and armament procurements, mainly via the “classified” items of the military budget). It’s way too little for the second largest army in the world. For example, in December, at the board meeting of the Defense Ministry Putin admitted that the average salary of an army Lieutenant was only 81,000 rubles.
It is clear that with such a large-scale war effort the amount of money spent on salaries including combat pay must increase dramatically. By these items alone, the maintenance costs of the troops deployed in Ukraine today should be increased by at least 3-4 trillion rubles a year, according to my estimates, but not by the planned 1-2 trillion rubles in any event.
However, in addition to the active troops Putin wants to mobilize a second army, comparable in size, officially equating the newly mobilized with contract servicemen. It is obvious that even the increased 5 trillion-ruble annual military budget will not be enough for these purposes. It seems that Putin and the Ministry of Finance are preparing for “cheating” military servicemen out of their salaries en masse (show these figures to your relatives and friends and warn them about it) - there is no other explanation in sight (in the case of deaths, large compensation will still have to be paid to the families).
The situation is very bad with the supply of the army in general. The current military budget allocates only 436 billion rubles for these purposes for the entire army (the data are taken from the materials for the federal budget approved in December 2021). We can see this miserable “supply” on the battlefield in all its glory. In order to ensure a normal supply of the army, Putin would have to allocate funds for this purpose of a completely different order of magnitude: several trillion rubles per year. No one is going to do that. Apparently, the government counts on the military obtaining food and uniforms “by themselves.”
Besides the fact that it will not be possible to finance the newly recruited troops and their supplies from the newly proposed 4.5-5 trillion-ruble annual budget, there is a more serious problem. In the previous years, about two-thirds of the military budget was spent not on the army itself but on the production and purchase of weapons, the military-industrial complex. This amount equaled approximately 2 trillion out of the total 3 trillion spent on the military. Arms expenditures were mostly classified (the disclosed one third of the military budget was used to maintain the army itself, which appeared to be a sort of unloved Cinderella in comparison with the main recipient of military spending, the military-industrial complex, favored by Putin).
Although we do not know exactly how the items of the increased military budget will be distributed, we can say with certainty that amid the enormous losses of arms in Ukraine and the depletion of ammunition reserves, the share of MIC spending in the 2022-2024 military budget will certainly not decrease and may even increase. Therefore, most likely no additional money will go to the army itself.
It turns out that nobody is going to finance or supply this enormous newly recruited 300,000-strong (or whatever) force. Leaving aside other aspects, we shall make only a single point - the army which is not paid and which is not provided with any supplies will not be able to fight. The fact is that the newly mobilized troops are being literally marched to certain death, because insufficient money has been allocated for their gear and supplies. Given the current scale of the war effort, one would expect Putin to increase the military budget to, say, 9-10 trillion rubles a year - but nothing of the kind has been observed.
One may ask: is it possible that there are some secret expenditures that we don't know about? No, there are not. The above figures for total military spending include classified items and are reflected in the generalized figures of the Ministry of Finance. If there were anything else, it could be reckoned. Any conclusions as to why Putin has been throwing the newly mobilized into battle without allocating money for such basic things as salaries and army supplies are for you to draw – it seems we are witnessing one of the most glaring examples of a complete breakdown of the Russian system of governance, which is not capable of adequately assessing reality. If true, Putin's catastrophic defeat is just around the corner.
I think he’s doing a lot of this stuff on purpose. He might have gone nuts and be making extremely poor decisions, but they’re his decisions. I mean, most of y’all know more about this stuff than me, but that’s my take. This is a purge.
The Ukraine has resources which both the EU and Russia want. That’s the bottom line.
Yeah, I seem to remember when the money ran out for the soldiers in 1917.
I guess we are screwed then. Our money ran out a long time ago.
No worries - Jack Dorsey will gladly make up the difference...
Putin saw a weakness/opportunity when China/Fauci got “Corn Pop” installed as President with their Facebook Drop Boxes.
Ha.
View all things through the prism of oil.
Ukraine has none. Period. The occasional wildcatter will manufacture a map showing oil or gas, and of course, wildcatters are paid to drill, regardless of what they find.
Russia’s debt is about 30% of GDP. The US . . . 130%.
Russia, the Soviets, had no independent central bank in the early 1990s. Their CB was tied to Economics ministry’s 5 year plan. They could not autonomously create Rubles.
They can now. And so, with simply this reality, no, and no, Putin will not run out of money. It can be created from nothing via Quantitative Ease. The playbook on QE is now well read everywhere.
The difference being . . . Russia has oil to back it up. US has shale wells that produce a liquid whose API viscosity is thinner than what used to delineate crude from condensate. But no one would dare say the thin liquid out of the Bakken is not really “oil”.
Regardless, the US consumes 21 million barrels/day. And produces about 12. And no, this has nothing to do with Biden obstructions. It is geology that does this.
Russia produces about 11 million barrels/day, and consumes 4.
This is why they will win global dominance.
He’s lost his cash cow through the 2 pipelines destroyed.
“We pretend to fight, and they pretend to pay us.”
Good thing our money will NEVER run out!
I keep thinking of Dr. Zhivago where the Russian army lays down their arms and deserts the front line. The saying was when the boots fail in the winter, the troops go home.
Africa’s oil is dying. Nigeria’s flow diminishes each year. Egypt and Libya combined are both also dying.
You’re left with Angola and the lesser locales of western Africa.
The oil just is not there.
View all things through the prism of oil, civilization’s lifeblood.
Why not speed up the printing press? That’s what we are doing. Gee, how can anyone talk about running out of money and not include us?
The western propaganda lies
Like some of my womens nagging
Never ends
Like when an artesian well pipe Bursts at the farm faucet
Just print more money. That’s what the U.S.A does.
“Spend all you want, we’ll make more!”
You are correct about energy being the lifeblood of a modern economy (my summary).
However, there is far more to the equation than simply having a resource.
Russia has lots of energy, but unlike American energy it has not fostered a middle class and provided stimulation for the larger economy. This is largely due to corruption and greed by their oligarch class.
I don’t know if they exist or not, but looking at a “payroll” breakdown of Exxon vs Gazprom would likely be eye-opening.
In the end, the success of the US economy is governed by energy but it also involves the middle class. When you have less than 15% of your nation as “middle class” you have little purchasing power to drive small business.
Putin and his inner circle are too greedy. You have about 500 people in Russia who possess almost 100% of the wealth. Literally.
History shows this is a very bad model to retain power. On top of that, you add in the widespread corruption in business and government at all levels and its not surprising the average Russian is apathetic about everything.
Putin is one of the most greedy people on the planet (and maybe the wealthiest person). You can’t take it with you and history will show he would have been smarter to take a smaller cut. The USSR was a dirt poor experience for most Russians. The Russian Federation is probably worse.
Why would any Russian want to fight for (or send their sons) to fight in Putin’s war? Show me any benefit to the average serf in Russia if they take the Ukraine. The oligarchs will absorb 99% of any wealth gained.
I understand that Putin talks about preserving Christianity, rejecting woke Western ideology, and the dangers of the WEF and Davos crowd. Ok. No real arguments regarding the descriptions, but is it because its good for his “people” or good for “him”?
Actions speak louder than words. He cares little about the average Russian and that is a fact. His inner circle of oligarchs and corruptocrats care little about the average Russian.
They traded communism for a kleptocracy. Sure, the West has incredibly wealthy people too, but much of their wealth came because of the wealth of those below them (Bezos for example) who bought their products.
Putin is toast folks. The Russian people will turn on him if he does not die first and history also shows that what emerges afterwards is usually not any better. Our experience in self-governance and freedom is highly abnormal if you understand history.
Russia is ripe for another revolution where they take back the wealth from the 500 and distribute it to the rest of the nation. Rinse and repeat.
I may be wrong, but wouldn’t the amount of energy consumed be a better indicator of economic strength than energy produced?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.