[semimojo]

…the social media giant was actively working with the Democrats to control the flow of information during the 2020 presidential election.

According to Taibbi they were also working with the Republicans. They just knew more Democrats so they got more requests from them.

[jdsteel]

99% Democrats, 1% Republicans.

And the Democrats suppressed tweets based in fact.

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

…the social media giant was actively working with the Democrats to control the flow of information during the 2020 presidential election.

According to Taibbi they were also working with the Republicans. They just knew more Democrats so they got more requests from them.

99% Democrats, 1% Republicans.

And the Democrats suppressed tweets based in fact. 16 posted on 12/3/2022, 9:37:39 AM by jdsteel

Nothing more routine in a scandal involving malfeasance in campaign finance , etc, than that “both sides” profited - 1% R, 99% D.

“The Keating Five” scandal comes to mind (I’m old). Some number of pols got ensnared in it, the four worst offenders being Democrats, and - I doubt not at all - the sixth one (and most likely the seventh one) as well. But in the media it was “five” - because that was how far down the list you had to go to find a Republican.