Used 2.1 megajoules of energy to create the conditions for the reaction, and achieved a 2.5 megajoules return.
0.4 percent gain doesn’t sound like much to get excited about.
OH wait it’s new
That’s not a 4% return, that’s a 19% return.
2.1 MJ to 2.5 MJ a .4 MJ increase over a 2.1 MJ cost.
That is a 19% net gain not a .4% gain.
I still don’t believe it, but we shall see.
If true, (which I doubt), democrats and environmentalists will fight to kill this with all of the resources they can gather.
19 % gain?
Right, here we go again.