[circlecity]

Since these restrictions have no historical basis they would not survive a Bruen challenge.

[Twotone]

You have to wonder why they keep trying to pass legislation that is obviously going to be struck down based on what the Supreme Court has done with the last few cases. I think it’s just lawfare - making us waste time & money defending the 2nd. And it keeps us from effectively stopping all the OTHER things the leftists are doing to destroy this country.

[OldGoatCPO]

These legislators are either fools or they are pandering to fools. Well, maybe both. NY has been the gift that keeps on giving. Every time they trot out new restrictions they strengthen previous pro-2d Amendment rulings. As you pointed out many of these laws will not survive court challenges. You may get some low level judge or the 9th circus to say they are constitutional, but further up the judicial food chain they get shot down. (Pun intended)

You want to stop this craziness, start committing people who are dangerous to society. That's were the courts should be engaged. I had a family member who was a danger to society and themselves. We tried to have the individual forced into treatment. The best we could do was 72 hours after which they could not involuntarily hold the person no matter if they were a threat to society and themselves. It did not end well.

[Wonder Warthog]

"Since these restrictions have no historical basis they would not survive a Bruen challenge."

So far, they are losing badly. I recommend the YouTube channel "Guns and Gadgets" which follows these things closely.

[zeugma]

Since these restrictions have no historical basis they would not survive a Bruen challenge.

Indeed. In a sane world, that would be obvious. Bruen was brilliantly worded.