[DoodleBob]

Let's take a trip down memory lane. Notice the ramp-up after 1980.

TABLE 1. Year of U.S. licensure of selected childhood vaccines

Vaccine Year of first US licensure
Tetanus toxoid 1943
Trivalent inactivated influenza 1945
Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids 1953 for children aged >7 yrs; 1970 for children aged <7 yrs
Inactivated polio 1955
Oral polio 1963
Diphtheria--tetanus--pertussis 1970
Diphtheria--tetanus--acellular pertussis 1991
Measles--mumps--rubella 1963 (measles); 1967 (mumps); 1969 (rubella); 1971 (measles--mumps--rubella combined)
Hepatitis B 1981 (plasma derived); 1986 (recombinant)
Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate 1987 for children aged ≥18 mos; 1990 for infants
Hepatitis A 1995
Varicella 1995
Pneumococcal conjugate 2000 (7-valent); 2010 (13-valent)
Live attenuated influenza 2003
Tetanus--diphtheria--acellular pertussis 2005
Meningococcal conjugate 2005
Rotavirus 2006
Human papillomavirus 2006

-------------------------------------------------------

And here's where they are in LA County:

How'd we get here? Per the article from which the table originated -

In April 1977, a Childhood Immunization Initiative was announced with two goals: attainment of immunization levels of 90% in the nation's children by October 1979 and establishment of a permanent system to provide comprehensive immunization services to the 3 million children born each year in the United States. Increased funding was provided through Section 317, and a major effort was made to review vaccination records of school children and vaccinate those in need. State and local public health personnel reviewed >28 million records during a 2-year period. In addition, state and local authorities enacted and enforced school immunization requirements. By 1980, all 50 states had such laws, and since 1981, immunization levels of students entering schools have been ≥95%. Thus, the first target of the initiative was met.(emphasis added) Achieving the second target would take considerably longer.

I'm all for health care that...well...cares for health. I'm also for the rights of the individual, am against force and fraud, and for plenary parental rights.

The issue isn't whether injecting all of those elixirs into young bodies is right, wrong, efficacious, or poisonous. However, let's HAVE that discussion. I mean...what do the vaccinated have to fear?

The issue is the rights of PARENTS vs the State. If you oppose progressive educational nonsense and indoctrination, then you MUST oppose mandatory vaccinations for public school.

[ConservativeInPA]

This article is pure propaganda. It’s a great thing that parents are not subjecting their children to experimental gene therapies. There is hope for the continuation of mankind, assuming boys stop feeling like they are girls.

[aMorePerfectUnion]

Most vaccines are unnecessary.
The US is way overboard on sheer number.

[mewzilla]

If parents read this, they might fall even further...

Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line

From the conclusion...

...Our study is the first in vitro study on the effect of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 on human liver cell line. We present evidence on fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.

[Clay Moore]

Shockingly, we will also see a drop in Autism. Pure coincidence.

[Paleo Conservative]

My almost 3 year old son was born just before the COVID-19 lockdowns started. He is fully vaccinated on schedule for all the vaccines listed on the CDC childhood vaccination list as it existed when he was born. He has not been vaccinated against COVID-19, but all other family members have been vaccinated against it with various vaccines available in their countries. My wife and I plan to wait til his next scheduled doctor’s appointment to discuss the issue with our son’s pediatrician.

[9YearLurker]

Meanwhile, hey, look, if you paid for health insurance, kept yourself in shape and lived a healthy life, paid your medical bills, etc., you’re a sucker!

Here comes the healthcare industry-entwined CT Dem gov with the next big giveaway from Joe Taxpayer:

https://www.greenwichtime.com/news/article/lamont-medical-debt-billions-relief-17759932.php?src=gthplocal