Ok. Guilty this time.
Posted on 04/03/2023 5:57:43 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Former President Trump posted his schedule for Monday and Tuesday on his social media company, Truth Social. He flies to New York today at noon. He will spend the night at Trump Tower. Tuesday his arraignment will happen at 2:15 p.m. and he will return to Mar-a-Lago after that. He announced that he will deliver a statement about the indictment at 8:15 p.m. That statement, however, is now in question. There is rumored to be a possibility that the judge in the case will issue a gag order to stop Trump from speaking out.
Sunday on CNN, Lanny Davis, the lawyer for Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, revealed that Cohen provided Manhattan prosecutors with documentation of Trump’s payment to a second woman who claims to have had an affair with him. This is an important piece of information because it may mean that D.A. Alvin Bragg’s case is broader than just the Stormy Daniels payment case. Lanny Davis told Axios that he can’t discuss the conversations with Braggs office but “he infers “100%” that Karen McDougal, the second woman, and a former Playboy model, is part of Bragg’s case.”
When the indictment is unsealed during Tuesday’s arraignment, it will be interesting to see what the charges are against Trump and how many there are. Are there felony charges? Does the investigation involve both Stormy Daniels and Karen McDougal? McDougal hasn’t been mentioned as much lately as Daniels has in the case before the grand jury. Or, maybe it’s just because Daniels has been speaking to the press since the leak was put in the media about Trump’s indictment. Some experts think the McDougal case was more legally threatening than the Daniels case. Karen McDougal was Playboy Magazine’s Playmate of the Year in 1998. She said she began a 10-month relationship with Trump in 2006. She allegedly was paid $150,000 for her silence. David Pecker, the former National Enquirer CEO, was called to testify recently, and that raised eyebrows.
So, we may learn that Bragg’s case is larger than originally thought. Either way, it is still highly unusual for a man, especially a former president, to be charged with a crime for paying a former mistress to keep quiet. Successful men do that kind of thing all the time to keep their extramarital affairs out of the eye of the public. This was exposed as a political case long ago, not a criminal case. Bragg is trying to save face after a long investigation into a former president and succumbing to pressure from progressives, to whom he is beholden for his election.
Trump will go to New York and then show up for his arraignment in the courthouse in Manhattan. It should be no surprise that he plans to make a statement to the press after all of that is over and he returns to Mar-a-Lago. When has Trump been silent on anything that involves him in politics? Almost 80% of Republicans consider Bragg’s investigation a witch hunt, as Trump claims. Trump is reaping the benefits of the publicity, as bad as it is, and raising big bucks off of it. In the first 24 hours, he raised over $4 million. That number grew to over $5M by 48 hours after the story broke.
Bragg’s office doesn’t want Trump to put his story out in the press after he goes to court tomorrow. Everyone knows that Trump will fight and he doesn’t pull any punches. It’s bad enough that a line has been crossed and Bragg is indicting Trump. Will he continue down this unprecedented path and issue a gag order to keep Trump quiet? Like him or not, Trump is a former president and that office carries a certain cachet. No one is above the law but a former president is treated with deference, at least until Trump’s presidency.
Who is next? The reason that even Trump’s critics are angered over Bragg’s action is that they know that if this is happening to Trump, it will happen to one of their guys, perhaps sooner rather than later. There are several investigations into the dealings of Biden, Inc., for example, that may come back to bite Democrats. Once a precedent has been set, there is no going back. Bragg overreached for purely political reasons and everyone knows it.
Trump’s team is considering bringing on a First Amendment lawyer because of the talk about a gag order.
The extraordinary move to potentially silence a candidate for president will likely enflame Trump’s supporters as he prepares to fly out of his Florida home.
‘The Trump legal team now thinks that the Manhattan judge will take the unprecedented step of silencing the presidential frontrunner with an unconstitutional gag order tomorrow,’ said a source.
‘The Trump legal team is considering adding a First Amendment lawyer to the effort to combat this and will fight it all the way.’
Breaking the gag order could trigger a fine of $1000 and a prison sentence of as much as 30 days, under New York law.
All of the process will play out on Tuesday in front of media cameras. Extra security has been arranged, if the need arises, around the courthouse. Traffic barricades are going up. It’s going to be a zoo. Trump, however, will play it to his advantage. Since the indictment, besides raising lots of money, his poll numbers have risen. People not planning on supporting Trump in 2024 now feel he is the victim of a witchhunt and are responding accordingly.
We’ll see what happens in that courtroom on Tuesday. The world will be watching.
At least he didn’t cheat on his country.
LOL!
RE: New York Conservative, Military Intelligence, Honest Democrat are all misnomers.
That is what I call an OVERGENERALIZATION.
>> So, when did paying off prostitutes become a crime?
Ron DeRangement wouldn’t know anything about that.
*Except with Mexico paying for the wall, paying off the national debt, pushing the COVID vaccines as the “greatest achievement of mankind,” and promising to destroy the deep state instead of nominating, appointing, and embracing deep staters which Trump did, in spades.
“Cheating on your spouse isn’t a conservative value.”
And I guess scriptually that would include looking at pornography and other erotica, which techically could include 90% of advertisement media... if one is considering casting first stones etcetera...
So - do you side with Pelosi in that he needs to prove his innocence? So far, we have accusations and no proof of anything.
Yep,
Funny how the Party of free sex, oral sex, anal sex, incest (with his own daughter for cripe’s sake) sex, and pedophile sex is so incensed that a Republican man MIGHT have had some on the side sex...
The quislings doth protest too much - methinks...and more illegal leaks from the prosecution are out there.
Looks Like DeoSanctus wil be in the single digits by next week.
Even if Trump listed this as “legal expenses”, people have to understand the purpose of the laws as written. The reason these laws exist in New York is that many corporations will hide illegal expenses from their shareholders and potential investors.
Trump Enterprises is a PRIVATE BUSINESS! He is not “hiding” expenses from anyone except himself...at best!! So, as the law is written, technically he MAY HAVE violated a misdemeanor paperwork issue. But, as the law was intended, Trump did not defraud anyone of anything - PERIOD! So, therefore, since he wasn’t hiding his “expenses” from potential investors or shareholders, this whole thing should be thrown out...not to mention the statute of limitations has run out on this whole thing, anyway!!
This is not just a “nothing burger”, the old lady at Wendy’s wouldn’t be screaming, “Where’s the beef?” She would be looking at an empty paper wrapper screaming, “Where’s the whole dang thing?”!!
RE: Trump Enterprises is a PRIVATE BUSINESS! He is not “hiding” expenses from anyone except himself...at best!!
What about for Tax purposes? That’s where Bragg plans to get him.
SeekAndFind needs to seek to find the difference between her arse and hole in the ground.
It depends. If he did not expense or try to write-off his legal expenses, then again...no crime.
If Bragg intends to get that deep into the weeds, then he is just praying every single person on the jury is an ardent never-Trumper, like many of the people on FR nowadays.
“Secondly, these alleged cheatings ( if true ) occured nearly 20 years ago.“
… - back when Donald Trump was the DARLING of the democrats… and one himself..
Ok. Guilty this time.
Ok. Guilty this time.
Gee the drive by TDS paltroon ( yes, I am talking to you ) learned some html. Impressive.
Gee the drive by TDS paltroon ( yes, I am talking to you ) learned some html. Impressive.
Ha ha ha, for someone like me who voted for Trump twice and will vote for him again, that’s some TDS right there. Impressive logic.
BTW, you’re talking to a Software Developer here, so, you ought to be impressed.
Oh so you think you are the only one around here?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.