Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Votes in Favor of UN Resolution Acknowledging Russian Aggression Against Ukraine
Kyiv Post ^ | 5/1/23 | Kyiv Post

Posted on 05/01/2023 8:29:21 PM PDT by Sunsong

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: entropy12

Good grief, who said China’s words would win the war?

China has changed their position. That alone is a big deal, imo.

Let’s see what happens in the next few months...


21 posted on 05/01/2023 9:02:40 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I’m just repeating this coz it says so much:

“Yeah Russia doesn’t care if it’s humiliated and undercut by all the greatest powers on earth - including its military ally China.
We all know Putin is so brilliant he doesn’t care if he loses support.
In fact we all know that every setback for pos Russia is meaningless. Russia is invincible, great economy, brilliant leaders, etc.
/s”

thanks


22 posted on 05/01/2023 9:04:59 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

I predict, in the next few months more of Ukraine buildings, infra-structure and power stations will suffer missile attacks.

We can compare notes in July.


23 posted on 05/01/2023 9:06:25 PM PDT by entropy12 (Food is most popular anxiety drug, exercise is the least popular.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

It is just really new ukies fake. here is a link: https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N23/116/57/PDF/N2311657.pdf?OpenElement

There is 3 strings in preamble but NOT in declaring text.

“...Recognizing also that the unprecedented challenges now facing Europe following the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, and against Georgia prior to that, and the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe..”

That is it. NOTHING else about Russia in this resolution at all.

SO ukies tell again a fairy tale.


24 posted on 05/01/2023 9:06:50 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Yeah Russia doesn’t care if it’s humiliated and undercut by all the greatest powers on earth - including its military ally China.==

It is NOT a fact but ukie fake.


25 posted on 05/01/2023 9:08:03 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

the chinese are not chess.

they are GO.

we are clueless. somewhere between checkers and tiddly winks.


26 posted on 05/01/2023 9:16:47 PM PDT by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

“WOW big change at the UN”

Wake me up when they impose SANCTIONS on Russia...otherwise it’s just a meaningless vote.


27 posted on 05/01/2023 9:27:57 PM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

Hiding land mines inside children’s toys in their homes must be disturbing to the Chicoms.


28 posted on 05/01/2023 9:30:02 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

It is a ukie fake. Here is a message of Russia representative in UN Dmitrij Polanskij.

The Goooge translation: “..Here, some Ukrainian publics began to disperse the “peremoga” about the fact that our key partners voted for a resolution condemning “Russian aggression”. I consider it necessary to clarify.

This is not about another “thematic” resolution within the framework of the special session launched in connection with the start of our NWO, but about the annual and routine resolution on UN cooperation with the Council of Europe (CE) that was voted in the General Assembly on April 26. In order to better understand the context, it should be clarified that the resolutions on UN cooperation with regional organizations adopted at various intervals have always been consensual and, for this, were of a very general nature and have never been politicized. There are many such organizations and various countries of the world are interested in supporting “their” regional organizations. A similar order existed until recently and was violated - guess who? That’s right, Ukraine!

In the preamble of the next UN-CE resolution, Ukrainians and Westerners introduced an extremely politicized paragraph (PP9), which is not related to the subject of the resolution. This move put many states in an awkward position. After all, if they do not support this resolution, the Westerners can pay back in kind when voting on the resolutions they need. Many of our partners - in the CIS, BRICS and so on - have found themselves in this situation. Therefore, they did the following: they did not support this paragraph in a separate vote, but voted for the entire text, while making interpretive statements that they did not support the politicization of the resolution on UN cooperation with humanitarian organizations.

Ukrainians and Westerners, of course, try not to emphasize these nuances, but for those who work in the UN, everything is very clear. Ukraine “achieved” that a) the consensus resolution became non-consensual (71 countries did not support it, but all could support it) b) 81 countries supported the anti-Russian paragraph during a separate vote, and did not support 102, which once again indicates a decrease in support for Ukraine at the UN c) many UN members condemned the Ukrainian methods of politicization of everything and everyone into the microphone.

So hurt or win? Decide for yourself!..”
https://t.me/dpol_un/525


29 posted on 05/01/2023 9:35:37 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123

Good point. And the people celebrating, thinking Xi has turned on Russia. I can only marvel at such wide-eyed innocence. It’s no wonder those Nigerian Prince scams actually work.


30 posted on 05/01/2023 9:36:16 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nickfrost1

we disagree. this is not nothing:

“...Recognizing also that the unprecedented challenges now facing Europe following the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine, and against Georgia prior to that, and the cessation of the membership of the Russian Federation in the Council of Europe..”

this is a change in China’s stance:

“the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine”

Again, let’s see what happens in the next few months


31 posted on 05/01/2023 10:04:16 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

this is a change in China’s stance:

“the aggression by the Russian Federation against Ukraine”==

Again it is just NOT true. Read the explanation Dmitri Polanski above.


32 posted on 05/01/2023 10:07:01 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: nickfrost1

Dmitri Polanski is a russian diplomat. His words have no meaning


33 posted on 05/01/2023 10:12:13 PM PDT by Sunsong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jerod

Why would the chinese communist party want a “democratic” Russia?


34 posted on 05/01/2023 10:36:57 PM PDT by SPDSHDW (Ron DeSantis. The latest GOPe champion in a long list of winners. Jeb! Mitt Romney, and John McStain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

Dmitri Polanski is a russian diplomat. His words have no meaning==

You may not believe him but there are a real votings of countries he mentioned. That is a change of ukie story isn’t it?


35 posted on 05/01/2023 10:38:33 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

The basic reason China supported this is to assert its “territorial rights” over Taiwan.


36 posted on 05/01/2023 10:45:04 PM PDT by rfp1234 (E Porcibus Unum )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong
Here is a official doc of UN on the voting on A/77/L.65 PP9. PP9 is a 9th paragraph in preamble. So you see China, Brazil, India abstained "A" in doc.


37 posted on 05/01/2023 10:59:24 PM PDT by nickfrost1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sunsong

Hmmm...Zelensky speaks to Rupert and Lachlan Murdoch for an hour (reportedly threatened to add them to his “blacklist”)...3 days later Tucker is fired. Zelensky speaks to Xi for an hour...3 days later China opposes Russia in UN. Zyyy sure seems to have a lot of leverage to swing around.


38 posted on 05/01/2023 11:02:54 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WoofDog123; DesertRhino
the chinese are not chess.

The world chess champion is Ding Liren of China.

39 posted on 05/01/2023 11:37:46 PM PDT by woodpusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SPDSHDW

My theory is this... The hardline Communist in China do not like democracy for China... But their children and grandchildren do like making money off democratic countries, travelling to democratic countries, etc... The old Commies like to keep those children in check, so they have these ‘Chinese police stations’ set up in democratic countries to insure that their children and grandchildren tow the Communist line.

They have ‘police stations’ throughout the USA, Canada, Europe, etc. and they likely have them in Russia... And the kids in Russia are missing their McDonald’s and they are especially missing their KFC. Just a theory.


40 posted on 05/02/2023 1:10:12 AM PDT by jerod (Nazi's were essentially Socialist in Hugo Boss uniforms... Get over it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson