Posted on 05/08/2023 6:41:22 PM PDT by CFW
A judge Monday barred former President Donald Trump from making public evidence and other material related to a pending criminal case against him in New York, where he is charged with falsifying business records related to a 2016 hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels.
Judge Juan Merchan also barred Trump from viewing evidence in the case other than in the presence of his lawyers. The ex-president is not allowed to copy the material.
The Manhattan District Attorney’s Office sought the protective order due to concerns Trump would “inappropriately” use the material or post the information on social media or elsewhere.
A prosecutor at a hearing last week in Manhattan Supreme Court called that risk “substantial.”
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...
TDS is an amazing affliction.
We have a rigged law system in the United States.
These corrupt judges were picked to “take Trump out,” same with the prosecutors, & same with the rigged juries.
In ‘democrat America’...... Trump & Trump supporters don’t have Constitutional Rights & Protections.
“TDS is an amazing affliction.”
It is indeed. Every legal precedent and norm has been thrown out the window all because the deep state has so much covered up and can’t risk anyone discovering what they have been doing to our nation.
“falsifying business records”
Trump doesn’t mop his floors, dust his furniture, or do bookkeeping.
Exactly what I was thinking.
Still waiting for the five-dimensional chess strategy to make itself seen.
God Forbid the General Public sees facts in a criminal case
This has been true since before Mary Jo Kopechne.
Um, the evidence, by its very act of being ‘evidence’ IS PUBLIC !
What about his first amendment rights?
GOD forbid Trump fires his Attorneys and goes Pro Se
... How could he defend himself?
This order has two impacts. 1.) Trump is gagged and cannot defend his public reputation. 2.) The government will leak and control information. This DA’s office already has a history of leaking testimony from the grand jury.
Of course. We are dealing with one of the most corrupt judges that ever walked the planet.
Let’s see if we have this correct, the plaintiff can allege or say anything they want but the defendant can’t comment about the “evidence” being brought against him.
Screw them and anybody that looks like them . . .
Or he could get a new better attorney.
-PJ
Don’t confuse me with facts,
I’ve already made-up my mind.
Meanwhile, a corrupt DA leaks whatever and whenever he wants.
Legal corruption at its finest!!
Isn’t it though?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.