Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CFW; RitaOK; AFB-XYZ

I wasn’t able to watch much of yesterday’s trial but I’ve read a little about testimony on the process and speed in which signatures were verified. There is no way that election workers actually confirmed signatures of the absentee ballots as is required by law.

xxxxxxxxxxxxx

I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.


5 posted on 05/20/2023 8:50:22 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: thinden

see post #3


8 posted on 05/20/2023 9:00:08 AM PDT by an amused spectator (Mitt Romney, Chuck Schumer's p*ssboy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: thinden

“I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.”

Who thinks it is a good idea for election workers to have access to these ballots at home with no watchers or surveillance?


11 posted on 05/20/2023 9:02:54 AM PDT by CFW (old and retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: thinden
I think I read somewhere that there were over 90 signature verification peep (in addition to the one shown skimming through the ballots on video) working from home or remotly, with no watchers or camera surveillance.

Yup, it's the culture of cheating and stealing elections that needs to change.

13 posted on 05/20/2023 9:04:48 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson