Posted on 07/08/2023 9:39:24 AM PDT by Beowulf9
LOS ANGELES -- California’s governor announced Friday that he won’t ask the state Supreme Court to block parole for Charles Manson follower Leslie Van Houten, paving the way for her release after serving 53 years in prison for two infamous murders.
In a brief statement, the governor’s office said it was unlikely that the state's high court would consider an appeal of a lower court ruling that Van Houten should be released.
(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...
““She’s been in prison for 53 years. ... She just needs to learn how to use an ATM machine, let alone a cell phone, let alone a computer,” her attorney said.”
If her attorney feels so strongly about it, then he should welcome her to live in his home while teaching her all those things.
That would be just a living hell for her. Know who else never used a cell phone, a computer or an ATM? Sharon Tate, and the LaBiancas...
Given the above, what fool could possibly think this person deserves parole? What, they need to make room in prison for somebody who offends some tranny fag with using the wrong pronoun?
If you listen to her, she sounds remorseful and sympathetic, I could care less, looks like she will get a 2nd chance on life, the Labiancas get nothing but rolling over in their graves.
The shame of it all is she will get tons of offers for her story, she should be able to make one dime off her stories of murdering innocent people.
Life in prison means nothing after this.
Maybe they can make a sequel to Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. This time starring Brad Pitt, Leonardo DiCaprio and Leslie Van Houten.
I was so mad I mistyped and should have said, Leslie Van Houten should NOT make one dime off of her stories, any money coming her way should be forfeited to some charitable organization to aid victims.
You know, I bet Quentin Tarantino and so many others in Hollywood have ears perked up at this whole thing.
Gee the Titanic in the news again and now the Manson Family.
They say fashion repeats itself. Maybe I should start wearing bell bottoms again?
>>>Know who else never used a cell phone, a computer or an ATM? Sharon Tate, and the LaBiancas...<<<
You’re so right. They never got the chance to enjoy the “privileges” of today’s world.
I never stopped. Wearing bell bottoms, that is. LOL!
Her first conviction was over turned in the late 70’s i believe...she was out for awhile, got re tried and was convicted again. Her lawyers claimed the stab wounds she inflicted on Rose Mary Labianca were all “post mortem”. Like that makes any difference. Then again, they have released others that have done far worse. She did dodge the gas chamber in 1976....I say let her rot and die where shes at...
And Sharon never got to hold her baby.
Maybe she can share an apartment with Squeaky Fromme?
I hate the legacy media SO MUCH! They tarnish the word and concept of “freeedom” regularly. Here, they make it sound like a good thing a person (this creep) will get freedom. Of course, her being released back into society is a BAD thing in multiple ways.
Elsewhere, they eschew the word “freedom.” They don’t approve of the freedom to post on Twitter without censorship. Likewise, “No!” to the exercise of 2nd Amendment freedoms. And, “No!” to the freedom to avoid compelled speech and cake baking. On, and on.
I hate them.
the typical liberal
is a
Patricia Hearst
Texas Ted watson
Leasli van hootin
Her lawyers claimed the stab wounds she inflicted on Rose Mary Labianca were all “post mortem”. Like that makes any difference.
I hope someone knocks her off as soon as she walks outside the prison gates.
Lol! Love ya for that :)
Right. Her baby was also a victim of the Manson bunch.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.