Posted on 07/28/2023 8:03:05 AM PDT by SJackson
July 28, 2023 by Daniel Greenfield 2 Comments
Newsletter
[Editor’s note: Make sure to read Daniel Greenfield’s masterpiece contributions in Jamie Glazov’s new book: Barack Obama’s True Legacy: How He Transformed America.]
33 people were shot over the weekend in Chicago. Urban gangland violence like that is what real “mass shootings” look like and finally a Journal of the American Medical Association paper addressed the problem by shifting the blame to something it calls “structural racism”.
The JAMA paper, which was quickly picked up by CNN as “Structural Racism may Contribute to Mass Shootings” and by Bloomberg as “Mass Shootings Disproportionately Victimize Black Americans”, acknowledged what conservatives have been saying about gun violence.
“There was no discernible association noted in this study between gun laws and MSEs [mass shootings] with other studies showing similar findings,” it noted.
The issue wasn’t gun laws, it was race. “The study found that in areas with higher black populations, mass shootings are likelier to occur compared to communities with higher white populations,” CNN reported. “The findings disrupt the nation’s image of mass shootings, which has been shaped by tragedies like the Las Vegas festival shooting and Sandy Hook in which most of the victims were not black,” Bloomberg added.
Faced with an immovable statistical object and the unstoppable force of equity, the JAMA paper blames the whole thing on structural racism. The study correlates urban areas and neighborhoods with high concentrations of single-parent households” to mass shootings. It then demonstrates that “structural racism” must be at fault because of “the percentage of the population that is black.” Black people in the study are interchangeable with racism.
Such is the state of woke medical science which tries to fix racism with more racism. The study never comes up with any plausible explanation of how structural racism causes people to shoot each other. At one point it claims that “racial residential segregation practices are predictive of various types of shootings” in a country where segregation had been abolished since 1964.
The study’s definition of segregation is so senseless that it lists majority black cities like Detroit, a 77% black city, as being 73% segregated, and Baltimore, a 62% black city, as being 64% segregated. A city with a strong black majority and black leaders is racially segregated and its people are suffering from “structural racism”. That’s why there are so many mass shootings.
But if segregation is the issue then why does Atlanta, which had actual segregation, have only 18 mass shootings, while Chicago has 141? Southern cities show up as less segregated and less violent in the paper’s data. A history of segregation is clearly not the issue. This isn’t about the past, whether it’s the historical revisionism of the 1619 Project, or any other.
If segregation were the issue, crime would have been far higher during segregation than after it.
Murders actually shot up after the end of segregation. So did most other kinds of crime. (That’s not to suggest that the end of segregation was responsible. After cratering in the fifties, crime was rising sharply even before the end of segregation along with general social breakdowns in which divorce rates rose sharply as did single parent families, Protestant religious denominations declined, so did various forms of institutional allegiance and public confidence.)
Crime did not turn the corner until the middle of the nineties when, by most accounts, gentrification actually pushed black people out of some neighborhoods resulting in what leftists misleadingly described as “resegregation”. It rose sharply again in response to pro-crime policies such as the elimination of bail, the mass release of criminals from prison during the pandemic, and the end of public safety due to the Black Lives Matter movement.
Segregation, real or fictional, has nothing to do with crime rates which track more closely with pro-crime policies, whether those of the Warren Court, that began with inventing the right to a lawyer and concluded with banning the death penalty, and with its modern counterparts.
The JAMA study however sticks to the central premise of anti-racism which is that any black statistical outlers represent systemic racism in action. Higher black crime statistics can only be interpreted as the consequence of white racism even if it means describing Baltimore, a black city with a black mayor and majority black city council, as a segregated city.
Who is segregating Baltimore and Detroit, or for that matter Atlanta and Chicago? Almost all of the cities that the JAMA study lists as the most segregated, including New York City, Buffalo, Cleveland, Milwaukee, Pittsburgh, and San Francisco, have black mayors.
What magical “structural racism” is forcing black Democrats to “segregate” their own cities and how does that cause gangs to shoot each other in the street? The JAMA study can’t do much except wave its arms toward generic ideas. “Future research is needed to develop more specific and sensitive markers of structural racism,” it claims. Unable to even define any kind of causative factor between what it deems to be structural racism and violence, it concludes, as every study does, that more research is needed to explain its inexplicable premise.
Every time the study bumps into a statistic that contradicts its premise, it shrugs awkwardly. Despite repeatedly blaming poverty, it observes that the “higher firearm injury rate persists even after correcting for income levels. In fact, the rate of gun violence among the highest income levels in Philadelphia was 15.8 times higher for black residents than white.”
Why are wealthier black people more prone to shooting and being shot? Structural racism.
“A potential explanation may be related to housing policies, as a long history of redlining has resulted in a higher density of black residents in certain neighborhoods,” the paper claims.
Today, what’s holding back any black person in the “highest income levels” from living anywhere he wants in Philly? Like Rittenhouse Square. Why could Stephen Smith, born a slave who bought his own freedom, started a lumber business and became the wealthiest black man in America in an era of actual slavery, live without fear of crime or anything except racist mobs?
The lies of anti-racism lies don’t help black people or anyone else. Gun laws don’t work. Blaming racism doesn’t work. The only thing that works is personal responsibility.
The cult of anti-racism insists, as the study does, that everything can be explained by waving at the “normalized and legitimized range of policies, practices, and attitudes that routinely produce cumulative and chronic adverse outcomes for people of color.” Rather than the adverse outcomes being the result of choices from within the community, critical race theory chooses to render black people powerless victims by claiming that their problems all come from outside.
Structural racism, like guns, doesn’t kill people. Poverty isn’t generational, it’s personal. History doesn’t hold us back, to paraphrase Obama, we are the ones holding ourselves back.
Blacks hate other blacks. Its self-racism. Over 90% of black murder and violence is caused by other blacks. Its quite clear blacks are massively racist towards other blacks.
I would disagree.
Gun laws do matter because they keep guns out of the hands of responsible people and put them into the hands of criminals.
Which is why I only favor the only kind of gun law that actually works, if you are incarcerated you may not have a gun.
Every other gun law just either makes honest people defenseless or it makes them into criminals.
But.... but.... but....
Without blaming racism and lack of gun control over law-abiding citizens, what does the corrupt, postmodern Democrat Party have left?
Link is to a story on censorship.
Link to this story.
https://www.frontpagemag.com/study-shows-gun-laws-dont-matter-race-does/
And It’s by Daniel Greenfield, not Jason Hill.
Black gangs have no respect whatsoever for life. They don’t care who gets shot while shooting at their rivals, they don’t care the age of the victims, gender or anything thing else. Inner city black folks have a much higher tendency to commit crimes. Broken families, refusal to become educated, insane desire to get money any way possible and no ability to care about right and wrong all contribute to the problem. But it is so much easier to blame whitey and force self hating whites to pay up.
BTTT
Good article...thanks for posting.
“...no substitute for personal responsibility.”
They tend to live around others like them, so most of their victims look like them. If they were evenly distributed in the population perhaps their victims would be more diverse (using the actual meaning of the word).
What did your comment have to do with mine?
What did your comment have to do with mine?
It can’t be simply a matter of race. Several Sub-Saharan African nations have significantly lower homicide rates than the US.
It is a matter of culture.
The quickest way to bring down violence is to promote marriage and intact families.
The second is to promote some sort of religion that binds the community together. I would avoid the mohammedan or any religion that practices human sacrifice but other then that most religions are based on the concept that through prayer, good deeds and learning you can become a better person. That is at least partly true.
The third is that there needs to be some sort of honest employment. This promotes a feeling of accomplishment.
People who are have the support of family, have feeling of accomplishment and are following a path of self improvement are people who are generally contented.
Contented people are much less violent. They do not feel like they have to "prove their worth" they already know they have worth.
Knock any leg of this stool out and you get violence.
Thanks. Did you ever wonder how many people actually read the articles?
Statistics is racsist!
“Structural racism” is a term like the Soviet term “sluggish schizophrenia”.
This article is several days old, but I thought it noteworthy. Much of it we already know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.