Skip to comments.
Judge rules Trump protected by presidential immunity for claims doubting election while in office
Just the News ^
| 8/1/23
| Madeleine Hubbard
Posted on 08/01/2023 10:27:02 AM PDT by CFW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: CFW
The Political Left will just find a new judge and a new law.
They never get tired.
They never get frustrated.
They never, ever stop.
21
posted on
08/01/2023 11:00:20 AM PDT
by
zeestephen
(Trump "Lost" By 43,000 Votes - Spread Across Three States - GA, WI, AZ)
To: CFW
Why is it illegal to question an election anyway?
22
posted on
08/01/2023 11:03:27 AM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
To: Eleutheria5
26% of America’s colonial population favored independence from Britain and King George. How come the 74% of loyalists didn’t lock up the 26% of independence seeking patriots on their 4th of July insurrection?
23
posted on
08/01/2023 11:05:54 AM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
To: CFW
"...is protected by presidential immunity for the statements he made creating doubt..."Who the hell needs immunity. What happened to The First Amendment?
24
posted on
08/01/2023 11:07:36 AM PDT
by
budj
(Combat vet, second of three generations.)
To: CFW
“There must be some way out of here”
Said the joker to the thief
“There’s too much confusion
I can’t get no relief
Businessmen, they drink my wine
Plowmen dig my earth
None of them along the line
Know what any of it is worth”
25
posted on
08/01/2023 11:07:50 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(Never attribute to incompetence-stupidity, that which is adequately explained by malice)
To: Dan in Wichita
“I don’t recall the Democrats needing approval from a judge to question the outcome of the 2016 election.”
Someone needs to explain to both of us what’s illegal about complaining about an election.
To: CFW
So only a sitting president can doubt an election?
27
posted on
08/01/2023 11:25:30 AM PDT
by
fruser1
To: blackdog
Um, ‘cause they had guns, and the loyalists mostly didn’t want to fight; they just wanted to sit around being loyal?
28
posted on
08/01/2023 11:28:31 AM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(Every Goliath has his David. Child in need of a CGM system. https://gofund.me/6452dbf1. )
To: Dan in Wichita
Nore those hanging chad’s in Florida...
29
posted on
08/01/2023 11:47:15 AM PDT
by
EBH
(America Blackmailed, The True Story of the World War...Coming Soon (1/21-))
To: blackdog
You left out the 1/3 who didn't give a rat's rear end. Only 1/3 were Loyalists.
Go with the flow, go along to get along people probably were the largest minority in that 3 way division.
30
posted on
08/01/2023 11:48:21 AM PDT
by
Alas Babylon!
(Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
To: CFW
Does this means it’s illegal for everyone else to doubt the election?
31
posted on
08/01/2023 11:49:35 AM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: TribalPrincess2U
Small, yes, but it does open a point I have yet to hear, and that is that the President, as chief executive officer of the executive branch of government, has the right and duty to question such things.
32
posted on
08/01/2023 11:49:43 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(No Arm up! They have!)
To: Dan in Wichita
33
posted on
08/01/2023 11:54:23 AM PDT
by
Fledermaus
(It's time to get rid of the Three McStooges; Mitch, Kevin and Ronna!)
To: mass55th
Got to say “Sore Loserman” didn’t are well on the right all things considered. Gore opened this Pandora’s box
34
posted on
08/01/2023 11:57:06 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(We need a better Trump than Trump in 2024)
To: Eleutheria5
No, this is America, you are allowed your doubts. You’re just not allowed to express your doubts or you’ll be targeted by DOJ for plotting/participating in an insurrection.
First amendment be damned.
35
posted on
08/01/2023 11:59:11 AM PDT
by
aligncare
( Make America Great Again…Trump 2024)
To: Dan in Wichita
I was in Portland visiting friends after the election.
Wall to wall protests.
36
posted on
08/01/2023 12:03:44 PM PDT
by
Zathras
To: CFW
How long until some grand jurors with prosecotors going after Trump begin to talk about the coercion to charge?
37
posted on
08/01/2023 12:05:07 PM PDT
by
blackdog
((Z28.310) My dog Sam eats purple flowers.)
To: CFW
"2020 election worker James Savage""But this case is not the proper place to do so. Here, Trump is entitled to Presidential immunity."
That's what you call, a Savage burn!
AAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAA*rimshot*
38
posted on
08/01/2023 12:05:29 PM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(Tanned, rested, and ready.)
To: CFW
How the hell can anything he said as President or after not be protected by 1st Amd??? He never called for Revolution or any sort of violence. The Jan 6 charges are based entirely on what he was believed to be thinking, even, imputed thought crime!
39
posted on
08/01/2023 12:09:35 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(covfefe W^A^w)
To: CFW
Since when is it a crime to doubt?
40
posted on
08/01/2023 12:11:35 PM PDT
by
left that other site
(Peacemakers who sow in peace reap a harvest of righteousness.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson