Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[NO] Rank Choice Voting
Alaskans for Honest Elections ^

Posted on 08/03/2023 11:20:56 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat

Our Initiative to repeal Rank Choice Voting has been approved by the State of Alaska! 85% Complete, Plan to finish 6 months early on August 31st, be sure to Sign Today!!!

...Our Office is Now Open 7 Days a Week. At this time, please call before you head this way to make sure we have someone here to get your signature.

(Excerpt) Read more at alaskansforhonestelections.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: honesty; integrity; vote
IIRC, the first person to sign this petition was Sarah Palin. She was a casualty in the idiotic "ranked choice voting" scheme that creates nothing but liberal politicians in our legislatures.
1 posted on 08/03/2023 11:20:56 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Good. Let’s hope it passes.

EACH vote should be made explicitly and contemporaneously to the election at hand, no others.


2 posted on 08/03/2023 11:23:00 AM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Ranked choice violates one-person, one vote. Those voting for the losing candidate get their votes re-cast for another. It should have been challenged by Kelly Tshibaka upon “losing” to Murkowski.


3 posted on 08/03/2023 11:24:18 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

“Those voting for the losing candidate get their votes re-cast for another. “

Just like a run-off election


4 posted on 08/03/2023 11:25:59 AM PDT by JSM_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Agree!


5 posted on 08/03/2023 11:27:24 AM PDT by Reily (!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Good on AKs. NevaDUH is headed there thanks to union whining. Dumbassery writ large!


6 posted on 08/03/2023 11:27:38 AM PDT by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with thisπŸ’©? πŸš«πŸ’‰)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
RCV was brought in by the Uniparty SOLELY to see that Murkowski won her Senate race. There was no way she was going to win a Republican primary in the old style, and ditto if she tried to run independent as she did previously (people had woken up to that grift).

Having Palin lose her House race was a bonus.

It's a pity that the idiot Alaskan people had to experience first hand how RCV pitted 3 candidates in the general election instead of 2. You ended up with one Democrat, one RINO, and one conservative. RCV was designed to keep conservatives from winning.

7 posted on 08/03/2023 11:27:43 AM PDT by HandBasketHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JSM_Liberty
No.

A run-off election is a separate event.

8 posted on 08/03/2023 11:27:53 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Ranked Choice Voting is almost as dumb as the National Popular Vote movement.

There are a few states that have adopted NPV as the law of their state. What it means is this: no matter WHO wins the state’s popular vote in an election, the state’s electoral votes go to whoever wins the popular vote in the NATION.

16 states and the District of Columbia have already passed this crap, which puts the electoral college number at 205. Last May, the Marxists in Minnesota put the law in place. Minnesota has 10 electoral votes.

So, let’s say in 2024 the Republican wins Minnesota by 1%. (Just imagine). But the Democrat operative wins the National Vote by 1%. All ten of Minnesota’s votes go to the Demonrat.

This reverses the wishes of the majority of Minnesota voters.

California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
D.C.
Hawaii
Illinois
Maryland
Massachusetts
Minnesota
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
Oregon
Rhode Island
Vermont
Washington

are the states with NPV laws on the books. The change over goes into effect AS SOON AS enough states with 270 electoral votes pass a similar provision.

Republicans in these states need to work on repealing these laws that are against what our founders intended. We were given the electoral college to protect the voters in each state...these laws take away the voting rights of the citizens and put the power in the hands of 49 other states and the corrupt District of Columbia.


9 posted on 08/03/2023 11:30:44 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Keep in mind, even some states without RCV still have RCV-enabled voting machines...

Now whyever would that be? πŸ€”


10 posted on 08/03/2023 11:30:51 AM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Agreed. Many people feel that something isn’t right with voting and our electoral systems - but they are too lazy to devote too much though or investigation to what it all means - so they are easily sold on the “new shiny thing” which promises to be different.

I feel the same way about term limits. Yes, there are corrupt and seemingly permanent elected politicians. But all term-limits do is make them tourists in the government they are supposed to control. It just makes the unelected deep-state bureaucrats (think Fauci, Comey, etc..)_ who have been there for decades even more powerful.


11 posted on 08/03/2023 11:39:50 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Palin jumped in on the very last day to file. She insured that the vote would be split enough that Nick Begich would loose to that disengenous fraud Peltola. If Palin was such a conservative why did she start a climate change cabinet in the state government? If she was a fiscal conservative why did she give the oil, survey and engineering companies $500.000.000.00 of our money for an engineering party that did nothing. She couldn't even keep her own household in order. With Nick we would have had an actual social and fiscal conservative. We need real leadership not glad handing cheerleaders who cut and run when it gets tough.
12 posted on 08/03/2023 11:40:52 AM PDT by FrozenAssets (You don't have to be crazy to live here, but it helps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

The only real structural deficiency with our voting system is that there is a lack of verification. An accurate count of real voters is essential.

The other issue is ill-informed, intellectually lazy voters who go with what sounds good or looks good on the idiot box and never bother to learn what is really going on with a candidate.

You hit the nail squarely on the head. If you do get a really good leader in office they will just be passing through. The bureaucracy is forever. Most of the garbage in our lives is inflicted on us by the unelected government that the elected government has abdicated to. If there is to be term limits for elected officials then there must also be term limits for unelected officials. What would be wonderful is if the voters actually gave a [insert expletive of choice].


13 posted on 08/03/2023 11:52:00 AM PDT by FrozenAssets (You don't have to be crazy to live here, but it helps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FrozenAssets
"She couldn't even keep her own household in order."

Let's see how any normal family could remain in good working order when they were constantly under attack for years on end by an evil media and culture.

14 posted on 08/03/2023 11:56:24 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (America Owes Anita Bryant An Enormous Apology)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

ranked choice voting should be illegal ...

runoffs should be required when needed ...
15 posted on 08/03/2023 11:57:56 AM PDT by bankwalker (Repeal the 19th ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrozenAssets

If we restore the republic, Kennedy’s EO 10988 must be rescinded.


16 posted on 08/03/2023 12:00:05 PM PDT by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

agreed.


17 posted on 08/03/2023 12:26:45 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

I am fairly sure there will be a legal challenge to this once it goes into effect.

Of course, I don’t trust our court system.


18 posted on 08/03/2023 1:05:06 PM PDT by DMD13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

“Rank Choice Voting” is just another way the Demoncrats ... I mean Democrats came up with another way of stealing elections.


19 posted on 08/03/2023 1:12:22 PM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Ranked choice voting favors small groups that are highly organized and motivated to steer the unorganized, the apathetic into action their way.

Voters who are not organized, focused on work,church, family, non-politics are the losers.


20 posted on 08/03/2023 2:50:19 PM PDT by spintreebob (ki .h g)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson