Posted on 08/12/2023 8:47:16 AM PDT by Signalman
Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointment of Delaware U.S. Attorney David Weiss to serve as special counsel in the Hunter Biden criminal probe is raising alarm with some legal experts who say it explicitly violates the Justice Department's regulations requiring such appointments come from outside the agency.
That regulation states: "An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government."
Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz told the Just the News, No Noise television show Friday night he believed it was a mistake for Garland to name the current Delaware U.S. attorney, both because he was from inside the government and had approved an earlier plea deal for Hunter Biden that spared the first son from prison but was rejected by the trial judge and panned by many as too lenient.
"Someone else, without a doubt, would have followed the regulations of the department, which [is to] say that the person has to be from outside the government," Dershowitz said. "I surely wouldn't have appointed a man from Delaware, where there's a lot of homecooking that goes on -- the Bidens live in Delaware -- who made a sweetheart deal that I predicted on your show would not be accepted. And he's going to want to justify that sweetheart deal. So he's not going to want to admit that he did anything wrong."
Others agreed.
"I see this as a farce, more cover up and corruption by Merrick Garland, and he's covering his own behind," Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said on The Sean Hannity Show. "I mean, the Attorney General is not allowed to appoint David Weiss as Special Counsel under federal regulations, and I have them right here in front of me, CFR 600.3. The Attorney General can only appoint somebody, quote, 'outside' the government."
Weiss, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware, has been pursuing an investigation into Hunter Biden for four years, according to the orders released Friday night that appointed him. His probe has allegedly been hindered by political interference, according to two IRS agents who came forward as whistleblowers. Supervisory Special Agent Gary Shapley and Special Agent Joseph Ziegler testified that Weiss was hamstrung from bringing charges against the first son due to the interference of two U.S. attorneys where he sought to bring the charges..
The whistleblowers contended that Washington D.C. U.S. Attorney Mathew Graves's opposition to the charges prevented Weiss from being able to bring charges before the statute of limitations expired. Weiss, they say, subsequently sought special counsel status to bring the charges anyway, but Garland allegedly rejected that request. In recent letters to Congress, Weiss has disputed that testimony, which undercut Garland's claims the Delaware prosecutor had the power to bring any changes anywhere he wanted.
"If it's in another district, he would have to bring the case in another district," Garland said in a June Senate hearing in response to questions about Weiss's charging authority. "But as I said, I promise to ensure that he's able to carry out his investigation and that he'd be able to run it. And if he needs to bring it in another jurisdiction, he will have full authority to do that."
Former federal prosecutor and Trump adviser Kash Patel said on "Just the News, No Noise" Friday that "[T]he Special Counsel is supposed to be an outsider, not brought in from within DOJ, and especially not the guy who has a conflict of interest in investigating the target, Hunter Biden, when he gave him an illegal, unconstitutional plea deal... How can that man be conflict-free, which is what the regulation requires at DOJ? They've put a conflict czar in there to cover up [FBI Director Christopher] Wray and Garland's unlawful activities."
Weiss's appointment marks the second possible violation of this guideline in recent years. In October 2020, then-Attorney General William Barr tapped then-Connecticut U.S. Attorney John Durham to serve as special counsel while investigating the origins of the now-debunked Trump-Russia collusion narrative.
Former U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas Bud Cummins told Just the News on Friday, "The requirement to appoint an attorney from outside of government appears so clear that one must suppose DOJ has conjured some way to work around it in the cases of both Durham and Weiss."
"It really looks like an assignment under 600.2(c) where you really don't appoint an independent special counsel, you use the same players but just make a few internal adjustments about supervision and reporting ('appropriate steps be taken to mitigate any conflicts of interest, such as recusal of particular officials.') If that's the case, calling him a 'Special Counsel' is inaccurate and deceptive," Cummins added.
Cummins also described the Weiss appointment as "Lipstick on a pig.' Weiss is a politicized prosecutor who has already demonstrated he is a disgrace to the authorities entrusted to him. Suggesting he has magically been transformed into an independent actor is a ridiculous sham. He is literally the reason a Special Counsel should have been assigned years ago. At this point the serious charges cannot be brought due to Weiss's intentional lack of initiative. The only thing gained now by pretending he wears a new hat is to throw a blanket of silence over the whole affair until Thanksgiving 2024."
Almost like it was pre planned huh? What a disgrace this “governing body” has become. Self enrichment is THE ONLY reason to hold office anymore.
“An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decisionmaking, and with appropriate experience to ensure both that the investigation will be conducted ably, expeditiously and thoroughly, and that investigative and prosecutorial decisions will be supported by an informed understanding of the criminal law and Department of Justice policies. The Special Counsel shall be selected from outside the United States Government.”
Right-wing extremism./s
Laws created by democrats were never meant to be applied to democrats.
This is called lawfare and is a form of warfare. It is the democrat party’s favorite weapon in the ongoing CWII.
Considering Jack Smiths previous reversal by the USSC he also does not qualify. He is known for being a shady character.
You quoted a FEDERAL REGULATION (CFR).
It’s not law.
“An individual named as Special Counsel shall be a lawyer with a reputation for integrity and impartial decision making.”
This line alone disqualifies the appointment... Conflict of interest.
Doesn’t the Special Counsel need funding?
If so, where do they get it?
What do laws, regulations and justice have any force when a dictatorship (Oligarchy to be precise) is in near total control?
What do rules, laws, the Constitution matter when you have a higher purpose of preventing DJT and conservatives from having further influence in the People’s Government?
Time for yet another lawsuit against crooked lawbreaking libtards
So it has no weight in a Federal Court of Law?
RE:.... a complete scam.
Did that ever stop them?
Rhetorical.
From up the thread, there’s a pdf of Barr’s appoint of Durham. Durham omits reference 600.3 and begins his authorization at 600.4. Can Barr be prosecuted?
Is it normal for a lawyer to ask to be the special counsel? It seems odd to me, but I’m not familiar with legal proceedings (blessedly).
Garland is the law.
Yep.
It’s an illegitimate approval with no force of law. Congress should request the Supreme Court to weigh in or at least this should be challenged in Federal Court.
Yes,if you going to actually do the job of investigating. But the main purpose of this is to outflank the Congress. They announced they were considering calling Hunter to testify. The next day a special counsel is appointed. Now he doesn't have to answer questions because he is currently under "investigation"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.