It's akin to after reconstruction, where KKK democrats would keep black republicans off the ballot.
We are losing our law enforcement and judicial systems to evil evil people.
Oh look, another opportunity for your desanctomonious. Or rather krispy kream, but same difference.
You cannot be accused of insurrection until after an insurrection has been declared. In 1861 Lincoln declared an insurrection. And then came the 14th Amendment.
No insurrection has been declared since 1992. And even if Biden declared one tomorrow, the Constitution prohibits ex post facto laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807#
Might be time to block biden and any democrat from the ballot in red state legislatures. There are more red state legislatures than there are blue state legislatures.
Who is it that cries about attacks on democracy? Do these cretins even listen to themselves?
EC
They are worried about what he might do to them if he’s back in office. They know all the criminal things that they’ve done starting as far back as 2015, right up to this very day, all the lies, collisions, conspiracies, plots, and of course the massive voter fraud in 2020. They don’t want him in there and having the power to expose them as the criminals that they are.
All these “state” challenges are being coordinated by someone high up in the national democrat party. What are those state AGs being offered in return for their cooperation?
The MN AG already said publicly, he has no authority to prevent Trump from being on the ballot in MN.
But they’re just so confident Trump’s going to lose because he’s so unpopular that they have to do this. F’n commies.
Problem is each of the 50 states can have one major lawsuit to keep Trump off the ballot and then an appeal, a countersuit and months of stages of judicial appeals upward.
“Tied up in court” coast incredible amounts of money and previous time that Trump needs to fight the successor to Biden.
Gen.Flynn and Paul Manafort sold millions of houses and investments to pay for their defenses. Their life savings gone to keep the wolves at bay.
If it can’t be done in one state, then it can’t be done in ANY STATE. But keep trying to put the square peg in the round hole, dems
“LITTLE SOMALIA” shouldn’t have any voice in this.
Why are they even bothering in a state where no Republican candidate will ever win anyway.
They are not afraid.
Unlike the GOP, they have multiple plans with backup plans behind it.
This is something EVERY Silicon Valley engineer learns from the day they first start working there.
They have 10 billionaires all running a portion of the DNC.
The only thing in our favor is President Diaper and his giggling VP.
Trump and/or the GOP could do the same thing but they are stuck in the 50’s way of thinking.
Here’s examples of a positive change:
1) Assign Desantis the task of unifying the GOP governors with identical systems and methodology.
2) Tell Trump to stop attacking nonsense targets, start attacking CA and begin working on a cabinet plan.
3) Form a taskforce NOT being lead by Ron or Trump to create a detailed plan to get rid of the GOP OLD Guard in the Senate.
4) Form an attack group NOT being lead by any of the other groups doing tactical analysis and totally detached from Congress, the President or the Senate. Set them up OUTSIDE of DC and keep them secret.
Notice you now have four unique groups with a real assignment and they don’t step on each others toes.
Trust me, this is now the new Democrat Party has been running since 2012
More lawfare nonsense from the Dims.
Also, This “Free Speech for People” non profit is primarily an anti Trump organization.
Their case should be quickly dismissed and every penny they receive from government should be eliminated ASAP.
Problem is they can't use the 14th amendment against Trump because he has never been charged with any acts against the United States, let alone been convicted of those charges.
None of the charges he currently faces would disqualify him either. The aim of all of these charges against him is really just to weaken him financially. That is the way lawfare works.
Another reason to vote for President Trump.
SECTION 3 of the 14th Amendment DOES NOT APPLY TO THE PRESIDENT.
The President is NOT one of the positions explicitly mentioned in the text (Senators, Representatives, Electors). Was this some sort of oversight on the part of the authors of the 14th ??? You would think that mentioning the President would be front and center in this section if it was applicable. And why be concerned about “ELECTORS OF THE PRESIDENT” ???? If an insurrectionist running for President could be disqualified, his Electors would be fairly irrelevant at that point but yet they are one of only three positions specifically mentioned.
What about the next part that addresses “any office under the United States” ? Well that won’t work either since the President is not considered an office UNDER the United States, it is the Chief Executive OF the United States. In 1878 David McKnight authored his study of the Electoral System of the United States and in that work he came to the conclusion that the President is “obviously not” an office under the United States. Being that he wrote this just 12 years after the 14th Amendment was passed, and his view has not been challenged for over 100 years, it is pretty reasonable to assume his view represents the basic civic thinking of the time much more so than partisan thinking interprets Section 3 today.
bttt