Posted on 10/05/2023 12:40:25 PM PDT by Red Badger
This “judge” looks and talks like a blithering idiot. His hair looks like a mop with bad glue and he dresses in Salvation Army rejects.
Which is the “radical statement”?
” Engoron said that neither side sought a jury and that state law doesn’t allow for juries when suits seek not only money but a court order setting out something a defendant must do or not do.”
What the heck?!
How is it he’s being charged with fraud when there are no plaintiffs. No bank or financial institution lost any money, all the bills were paid on time. This is just more treachery by the left in their blatant attempt to deny him his rights.
The judge does not have a license for providing property evaluations, as required by state law. Yet her ruling relies on her word that the appraisal should have been less than Trump estimated. When she gave a different number than Trump, and put it into her ruling, she broke the law.
Not standing up to these poop stains that call themselves democrats has emboldened them to ignore laws and write their own. We’re now seeing a govt sponsored hit job against an innocent family. This is a Stalinist railroading. When we come back into power these people need to go to prison for this.
In 30+ years of running my own business, I never had a bank NOT perform their own analysis. I’m certain that anyone who has bought a home using a mortgage has experienced the real estate appraisal process used by banks. I can only image serfs living on the Democrat plantation and who never owned real property believes James’ accusations of fraud.
NY has some of the most arcane laws in the US.
Mostly written by the Mafia.................
the only thing the bank would have relied on in the financial statements would be the address of the property
and they would double check that
they would toss the numbers and do their own
I bet she HAS NEVER OWNED A HOME, nor anyone in her office..............................
He's a typical run of the mill NY liberal
The Citizens Rule Book
The year was 1670, and the case Bushnell sat on was that of William Penn, who was on trial for
violation of a “Conventicle Act.” This was an elaborate Act which made the Church of
England the only legal church. The Act was struck down by their not guilty vote. Freedom of
Religion was established and became part of the English Bill of Rights and later it became the
First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In addition, the Right to peaceful assembly was
founded, Freedom of Speech, and also habeas corpus. The first such writ of habeas corpus ever
issued by the Court of Common Pleas was issued to free Edward Bushnell. Later this trial gave
birth to the concept of Freedom of the press.
Had Bushnell and his colleagues yielded to the guilty verdict sought by the judge and
prosecutor, William Penn most likely would have been executed as he clearly broke the law.
HE BROKE THE LAW!
There would have been no Liberty Bell, no Independence Hall, no city of Philadelphia, and no
state called Pennsylvania, for young William Penn, founder of Pennsylvania, and leader of the
Quakers, was on trial for his life. His alleged crime was preaching and teaching a different
view of the Bible than that of the Church of England. This appears innocent today, but then,
one could be executed for such actions. He believed in freedom of religion, freedom of speech
and the right to peaceful assembly. He had broken to government’s law, but he had injured no
one. The four heroic JURORS knew that only when actual injury to someone’s person or
property take place is there a real crime. No law is broken when no injury can be shown. Thus
there can be no loss or termination of rights unless actual damage is proven. Many imposter
laws were repealed as a result of this.
Arthur Engoron openly stated that he can overrule juries that “get it wrong,” based on his own emotional take on the case.
The judge is a DUDE.
Someone please explain this to me. So a PRIVATE COMPANY who employs underwriters. Said underwriters analyze, assess and price the assets of said borrower. The PRIVATE COMPANY then determines the rates based on what the PRIVATE COMPANY underwriter has deemed to be the borrower’s assets and value. So, explain to me what crime has been committed? What does Government have to do anything with this?
The least you could do is edit what you post and remove all the duplicate paragraphs.........
Yikes.
Looks like the guy on Creepshow.................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.