Posted on 01/01/2024 3:29:21 PM PST by chickenlips
Despite months of feverish recruiting and manipulation of its numbers, United Teachers of Dade (UTD) came up short in its attempt to bring its membership up to the threshold necessary to avoid a recertification election required under terms of a new law passed by Florida’s legislature this past summer.
On Dec. 19, UTD President Karla Hernandez-Mats confirmed the union hadn’t been able to persuade 60 percent of the 30,000 teachers it officially represents to become dues-paying members.
A few days earlier, she claimed the union had increased its numbers to just more than 58 percent, including 800 new members. What she didn’t explain was that the union had to kick out all the substitute teachers from the bargaining district in order to increase their membership percentage, and still fell short.
Hernandez-Mats declined to disclose the final tally.
The 60 percent requirement was imposed under Senate Bill 256, the most aggressive state labor reform bill since Wisconsin’s Act 10 under then-Gov. Scott Walker. SB 256 also prohibits public agencies like school districts from deducting dues directly from employees’ paychecks on behalf of the union representing their bargaining unit.
Critics say the legislation was simply a way to silence unions, but advocates insist that if a union hasn’t won the loyalty of at least 60 percent of those it purports to speak for, allowing its members to weigh in on its usefulness isn’t an unreasonable demand.
The Freedom Foundation worked closely with the Florida legislature to enact the new law, and soon after, a group of Miami teachers approached the organization for help in establishing an independent, apolitical, local-only alternative that keeps their dues in their district.
(Excerpt) Read more at redstate.com ...
This is huge!
Let’s hope this cascades to other counties & states!
In 2017, the state of New York passed a law requiring prospective school teachers to take a literacy test to get their license, but repealed it the following year because 36 percent of whites, 54 percent of Hispanics and 59 percent of blacks failed on the first try.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/13/nyregion/ny-regents-teacher-exams-alst.html
Regents Drop Teacher Literacy Test Seen as Discriminatory
By Kate Taylor
New York Times, March 13, 2017
The Board of Regents on Monday eliminated a requirement that aspiring teachers in New York State pass a literacy test to become certified after the test proved controversial because black and Hispanic candidates passed it at significantly lower rates than white candidates.
The Regents also moved forward with a proposal that would allow some students who failed another test, aimed at evaluating practical skills like lesson planning and assessment, to be certified as teachers based on their grades and professors’ recommendations.
Together, the steps signal how much the Regents’ approach has changed under the current chancellor, Betty A. Rosa, after several years of efforts to raise the bar for entering the profession.
Under the previous chancellor, Merryl H. Tisch, the state created a set of more rigorous licensing exams. Among them was the Academic Literacy Skills Test, or ALST, which was intended to assess reading and analytical writing skills, and the edTPA, which requires candidates to submit a portfolio of work, including unedited videos of them interacting with students.
The literacy test proved challenging to many prospective teachers, but particularly for black and Hispanic candidates. An analysis done in 2014, the year the test was first administered, found that 64 percent of white candidates passed the test on the first try, while only 46 percent of Hispanic candidates and 41 percent of black candidates did.
Nonetheless, a federal judge who had found two older certification tests to be discriminatory ruled in 2015 that the ALST was not biased, because it measured skills that were necessary for teaching.
However, deans of education schools, especially those with large numbers of black and Hispanic students, disagreed, and argued that the exam was exacerbating a shortage of teachers of color. More than 80 percent of public-school teachers in the country are white, according to the federal Education Department, while a majority of public school students are not.
Others said that the exam was redundant, given the other requirements to become a teacher.
Michael Middleton, dean of the Hunter College School of Education, said in an interview on Monday that the battery of exams currently required of teacher candidates — four, in most cases — was onerous and expensive, and that eliminating the ALST was appropriate.
“We already know that our licensure candidates have a bachelor’s degree, which in my mind means they have basic literacy and communication skills,” Dr. Middleton said.
The state Education Department has said it will review another required licensing test, the Educating All Students exam, which measures teachers’ skills at reaching students with disabilities and those learning English, to see if it should be adjusted to also assess literacy skills.
The edTPA has not proved as difficult as the ALST: The overall pass rate is 77 percent, according to the state Education Department. But black candidates pass the test at rates lower than candidates of other races or ethnicities. A task force convened by the Regents, made up of deans and professors of education schools, as well as teachers and district superintendents, recommended recalibrating the passing score on the exam and allowing certain students who fall short of a passing score on the edTPA to become certified based on the recommendations of their teachers. The Regents agreed on Monday to move forward with that proposal.
Kate Walsh, president of the National Council on Teacher Quality, said that eliminating the literacy exam because of minority candidates’ performance on it was the wrong response.
“What we are effectively doing is perpetuating a cycle of underperformance,” she said.
“People are showing a tremendous amount of weakness by just backpedaling because they feel like it’s the politically sensible thing to do,” she added.
Even before Monday’s actions, the Regents had backed off the tougher requirements, instituting safety nets that allowed candidates who failed the edTPA to try to pass an older test to qualify, and allowed those who failed the ALST to show through their coursework and grades that they had the skills that the test measures.
Beware of the egregious capitalist named taxpayer.
Public unions should be illegal.
Good job to DeSantis.
I know a lot of us here are quick to criticize Ron DeSantis’ presidential campaign.
But one can’t help but be impressed overall with what he’s done as governor of Florida.
Let’s give credit where credit is due.
The Freedom Foundation used to be called the Evergreen Freedom Foundation in Washington State, believe it or not. It was founded by a Republican named Bob Williams.
They were instrumental in the passage of Washington’s Opt Out law. Teachers cannot be made to join a union. Bob retired from the organization about 5 years ago. They rebranded and are taking their winning record on the road. Fantastic.
Government employee unions shouldn't be merely silenced, they should be abolished.
Remember: Donald Trump started throwing verbal feces at Governor DeSantis on election day 2022.
He is still the best Governor in the country IMHO. Disaster as a Presidential candidate.
“and argued that the exam was exacerbating a shortage of teachers of color.”
What an absolutely asinine statement. Does he mean that only black teachers can teach black kids? That only Hispanic teachers can teach Hispanic kids?
Let’s try this on for size:
“Only white teachers can teach white kids.”
L
Absolutely TYPICAL dimmocrap “solution” to a problem—if your people cannot perform up to stated standards, don’t encourage them to work harder to meet those standards. No, ELIMINATE THE STANDARDS. In their asinine eyes, problem solved. So kids who frequently come from homes where the parent(s) do not have a good grasp of English can now have teachers whose grasp of English is not much better. Who frequently use street language or “ebonics” instead. So how are these kids supposed to learn “the King’s English” to qualify for a professional job which requires the ability to expertly wield the language? By employing such pathetic sad sacks of teachers-—and in which other areas are they deficient?-—the Bored of Ed is guaranteeing mediocrity and failure. When I took the teacher qualification test, I scored a perfect score of 300 on it. That is what the students deserve, not someone who is barely a page ahead of them themselves.
The Dept of Education should be the very first thing President Trump abolishes next year
Is that before or after he builds the FBI a glorious new headquarters in central DC?
Wonderful news!
It’s after he pays people to have babies to save space cial security. Not taxpayers, not citizens, just people. But that is right before he offers them DACA amnesty for the second time. He essentially told the world that republicans embrace open borders and he started the audacious caravans by his amnesty. Just like Rubio, only Rubio could not make an impact like that.
For crying out loud, he’s not some magician who can wave a magic wand and come up with the money for that. give it a freaking rest already. Congress holds the purse strings. or did you not take civics? Nobody is saying DeSantis hasn’t been a good governor, but I don’t feel he’s ready for taking on the Deep state or the enemies we have within, not at THIS TIME. K
Wonder how much Janus v. AFSCME had to do with this...
Did I say anything about DeSantis? And yes I know civics and haven’t the slightest idea why you bring it up, because the point is that the statement was made, not whether it can actually be executed.
My point is this, and it’s hardly novel: Trump lacks discernment. Just like praising that BLM guy from Rhode Island who endorsed Gina The FBI tried to take him out, and is arguably the greatest institutional threat to our freedom. Congress would not approve shutting it down, but it absolutely needs to have all its top management fired, and needs a thorough reform.
Some have said his post was sarcastic. I don’t see any evidence of that in its text. If it was, it’s ill-advised. MOST voters are low information voters, and any intended irony would be completely lost on them. Could it be that Trump doesn’t understand the housecleaning that is desperately needed? Frankly I fear that’s the case, in which case his reelection wouldn’t result in any diminution of the fearsome power of the deep state
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.