Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dforest

I didn’t twist anything, that is what I thought the article said.

I haven’t made coffee yet and maybe misread it, is the article about attacking Russian nuclear sites?


12 posted on 01/11/2024 8:16:38 AM PST by ansel12 ((NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12

Terminology.

Not nuclear sites.

ICBM sites. ICBM sites certainly have to launch if targetted, and as I just noted, if the intention of the article was missiles that are not ICBMs then there is no reason Russia can not base them next to the ICBMs.

Incoming threats then force an ICBM launch.


14 posted on 01/11/2024 8:19:24 AM PST by Owen (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson