Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S., Chinese Researchers Wanted to Engineer Virus Similar to Covid One Year before Pandemic Outbreak, Internal Docs Show
national review ^ | 1/24/2024 | HALEY STRACK

Posted on 01/24/2024 9:34:20 AM PST by bitt

American scientists applied to engineer coronaviruses with remarkable similarities to SARS-CoV-2 at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2018, just one year before the pandemic’s outbreak, according to newly released internal documents.

The 2018 grant proposal and related documents — obtained by the watchdog group U.S. Right to Know through a Freedom of Information request — reveal that an American virologist working with the Wuhan lab planned to engineer a virus that resembles SARS-CoV-2 as part of a U.S.-China research collaboration called “DEFUSE.” The research project was to be led by EcoHealth Alliance, a New York City-based research nonprofit that received funding from the NIH and routed that funding to the Wuhan lab to perform gain-of-function research on coronaviruses in bats.

While the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) ultimately rejected this particular funding request, the application shows that American scientists and their counterparts in China were particularly interested in researching coronaviruses with striking similarities to the one that eventually emerged as a global pandemic that claimed millions of lives. An EcoHealth Alliance spokesperson said in a statement that the research outlined in the proposal never took place.

Gilles Demaneuf, a New Zealand data scientist who has studied the mathematical probability of each of the Covid origin theories, told National Review that data and predictions are now piling up to suggest that the release of SARS-CoV-2 was a research accident.

The new information “still does not prove a lab-created virus,” Demaneuf said. “But it is a significant step in that direction.” .

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 2018; china; chinavirus; covid; covid19; darpa; defuse; ecohealthalliance; engineervirus; plandemic; righttoknow; uschineseresearchers; wiv

1 posted on 01/24/2024 9:34:20 AM PST by bitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; bitt; ...

p


2 posted on 01/24/2024 9:34:32 AM PST by bitt (<img src=' 'width=30%>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

I wonder if there will be a new virus every election year?


3 posted on 01/24/2024 9:35:58 AM PST by yldstrk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Yeah and now they’re talking about “Disease X”, documents show it’s been in the works for at least 2 years.
Covid was done on purpose.
So will the next one.


4 posted on 01/24/2024 9:37:54 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

20 times the lethality of Covid, while not actually in existence.
Science is amazing!
Get your vax bro…


5 posted on 01/24/2024 9:42:55 AM PST by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Why are these people not hanging from a scaffold?


6 posted on 01/24/2024 9:59:17 AM PST by caddie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

‘An EcoHealth Alliance spokesperson also denied that the research the organization funded at the Wuhan lab qualifies as “gain-of-function” research under the NIH’s definition, which requires that the virus being researched has been shown to be infectious to humans. Several prominent scientists, including Ebright, have argued that the NIH narrowed its definition of “gain-of-function research” in a rhetorical effort to ensure that the research that was conducted at the WIV would fall outside of it.’

It seems like we have had a lot of re-definitions lately.

Why does the US do gain of function research?

Why isn’t the mRNA vaccine considered gene therapy?


7 posted on 01/24/2024 11:29:20 AM PST by ChessExpert (Required for informed consent: "We have a new, experimental vaccine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

They weren’t happy with the out come the first time, when do we put these pukes to the gallows


8 posted on 01/24/2024 2:33:23 PM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson