Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“How in the Hell Dare He Raise That?” Biden Faces a Question of his Own Making
Jonathan Turley ^ | February 16, 2024 | Jonathan Turley

Posted on 02/17/2024 6:21:11 AM PST by george76

Below is a slightly expanded version of my New York Post column on the report that President Joe Biden, not Special Counsel Robert Hur, raised the death of Beau Biden during his interview. The report, now confirmed by various media outlets, suggests that the President lied to the press and the public in his controversial press conference after the release of the Special Counsel’s findings.

Here is the column:

In his press conference following the Special Counsel report on his retention of classified documents, President Joe Biden lashed out at Special Counsel Robert Hur over allegations that he has such “diminished faculties” that it would be difficult to criminally charge him. One of the key and scripted moments was Biden angrily denouncing Hur for raising the death of his son. The “how dare you” moment was eagerly re-played by many in the media who piled on the next day in calling the question outrageous, callous, and unprofessional. Now, however, NBC is reporting that it was not Hur but Biden himself who raised the death of his son.

In the disastrous press conference, Biden quickly went on the attack and asked “How in the hell dare he raise that?” Frankly, when I was asked the question I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business.”

...

The NBC sources suggest that this was a knowingly false claim by the President and that he was the one who raised his son’s death.

If it is true, this is not something that the White House can simply correct with a few brackets rewrites. The corrected version would read “How in the hell [could I] raise that. When I [raised] the question I thought to myself it wasn’t any of their damn business.”

It would make referencing recent conversations with dead foreign leaders look like relative moments of clarity.

While we will have to await the spin, the report (if true) suggests that the President is either mentally diminished or openly deceptive in such moments. The latter seems most likely. Biden clearly went to the podium intending to make this attack on Hur. That means that it was likely vetted by his staff.

Moreover, the press conference was inundated by false claims from the President. He suggested that the Special Counsel did not find willful retention of material. He not only did so but repeatedly said so in the report. He claimed that he did not show classified material to third parties. Not only did the Special Counsel say that he did, but there is a witness to that fact. He said that he kept material in locked drawers or drawers capable of being locked. The Special Counsel showed actual pictures of ripped boxes holding such material in his garage.

Once again, it is hard to see how these false claims were made without the prior review of Biden’s staff. The President famously works off teleprompters and scripts. The staff also did not correct the record on any of these false claims immediately after the press conference despite being demonstrably untrue.

Ironically, the White House may have to claim that the President was simply confused in a press conference called to deny such chronic confusion. It has already had to spin out of the President confusing the presidents of Egypt and Mexico in the same press conference.

Yet, in support of the diminished capacity defense, the President continues to make false claims about his son Beau, including repeated claims that Beau died in the Iraq War. He actually died at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Bethesda, Maryland from glioblastoma, the most prevalent form of brain cancer, in May 2015 — six years after he returned from Iraq.

Of course, an enabling media quickly took the lead from the White House and lashed out at Hur. Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna of California objected “I do think the special counsel’s gratuitous mention of Beau Biden, whatever you think of the rest, but to talk about someone’s dead son and to put that in … what is this country coming to that we’re politicizing that?”

In the media, there was outrage. MSNBC’s Jennifer Palmieri asked:

“Why was the special counsel asking him about Beau’s death, right? There is no legitimate answer for why he would do that, and in an interview that happened in October, months and months and months after the special counsel began their work. Unless they were trying to trip him up, rattle him, gain oppo, right? I mean, I think it is just that, the fundamental question of, why would you ask him about Beau’s death, raises the question about the legitimacy of the entire line of questioning,”

MSNBC host Al Sharpton joined the chorus of objections and Douglas Brinkley, a presidential historian, told MSNBC it was “beyond the pale.” . Likewise, former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder was positively irate:

“[T]he larger question is, why the hell are you asking that question? What does that have to do with the retention of classified documents? I’d like to think that at best, this prosecutor was extremely naive, a rube perhaps. He’s a Republican appointee, and he’s thinking, I want to have a life beyond what I’m saying in connection with this investigation. And that might have shaded what he put in the report.”

The First Lady was reportedly used by the campaign to raise money off of the outrage, stating “I hope you can imagine how it felt to read that attack — not just as Joe’s wife, but as Beau’s mother.”

She added “[w]e should give everyone grace, and I can’t imagine someone would try to use our son’s death to score political points.” However, if these reports are true, it was the President who interjected the death of his son into the interview.

The use of the White House to spread false claims about these investigations is a highly precarious practice. It can be the thing that impeachments are made off. Ian Sams, spokesman for the White House Counsel’s Office, has been especially aggressive in attacking critics of the President and spinning these reports. He was recently confronted about false claims in connection to the Hur report.

The use of White House staff to carry out an alleged disinformation campaign can raise alleged violations of the public trust and misuse of federal staff and resources. Such allegations have been included in past articles of impeachment and would be most serious in relation to the ongoing investigation into influence peddling by the Biden family. In the. most recent controversy, the aggressive effort of the White House Counsel’s office to shape the coverage led to a rare rebuke from the White House Correspondents Association.

The coordinated campaigns can also bootstrap earlier alleged violations into Biden’s presidency. For example, the House is pursuing allegations of corruption stemming from Biden’s time as Vice President and the period in which he was a private citizen before running in 2016. Using federal personnel like Sams to spread or repeat false claims could make such allegations “evergreen” in tying them to contemporary ‘in office” conduct.

In other words, the White House has to be careful that the effort to spin out of scandal only results in spinning into an impeachment.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hur; roberthur; specialcounsel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 02/17/2024 6:21:11 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

He has advanced dementia, do NOT expect rational behavior.


2 posted on 02/17/2024 6:24:03 AM PST by null and void (I identify as a conspiracy theorist. My personal pronouns are told/you/so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Last night Mark Levin played a clip of Biden from a couple of years ago, he sounded like a great orator compared to today, he is slipping very quickly.


3 posted on 02/17/2024 6:25:49 AM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: george76

Hopefully Hur mentioned Hunter a few times.


4 posted on 02/17/2024 6:29:17 AM PST by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

President Roomba has knocked over a plant, spread a dog turd all over the house, and has now sucked up the cat.
I didn’t do that!


5 posted on 02/17/2024 6:30:07 AM PST by Keyhopper (Indians had bad immigration laws)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

They’re setting the table for the day they show him the door - as soon as they can figure out how to discard Harris without ticking off a big chuck of their base.


6 posted on 02/17/2024 6:30:53 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stosh

She could die. Nobody’s fault, nobody to be ticked off at.

Not advocating, just speculating...


7 posted on 02/17/2024 6:33:45 AM PST by null and void (I identify as a conspiracy theorist. My personal pronouns are told/you/so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76

Joey Biden nailed himself to the wall with his OWN LIES. Arrogant Bastard just runs his mouth with his brain disengaged. Stupidest person in the Senate indeed!!!

For years, Joey has dragged Beau’s dead corpse out and used it a a prop to get sympathy. Based on Joey’s stories, Beau died in a dozen different places, from a dozen different causes, and most likely on a dozen different dates!!

Joey needs to get back on Amtrack, GTFO the White House, and just GO AWAY!!!!

Then again, Democrats are stuck with him for at least another 6 months.

Let’s Go Brandon!!!


8 posted on 02/17/2024 6:36:49 AM PST by OHPatriot (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

It was the invisible guy that Biden tries to shake hands with who asked the question, which is why Joe doesn’t think he brought it up on his own. No Joke!


9 posted on 02/17/2024 6:38:30 AM PST by Bernard ("It ain’t that there are too many fools, but that the lightning ain’t distributed right.” Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
It seems to me the question that should be asked, regarding recommendation of potential charges against Biden, is not if Biden is mentally capable now, but was he mentally capable at the time.

(And yes, I do understand that the President must first be successfully impeached before any potential charges could be filed).

We have all seen how quickly he has gone downhill, but that should not be pertinent to his past actions.

The Hur report smacks of the same coverup we saw from Comey regarding Hillary and lack of intent.

10 posted on 02/17/2024 6:39:19 AM PST by Michael.SF. (There is only one reason why I will ever vote for a Republican: Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OHPatriot

He did the same thing with his first wife (before he married Hill). He dragged the boys around on the campaign trail, referring to them as “these poor motherless boys”.


11 posted on 02/17/2024 6:46:39 AM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: george76
Marie Antoinette Brandon? *SMIRK*


12 posted on 02/17/2024 6:49:40 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have, 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

It’s time to hide the car keys from grandpa.

I went through it with my father.


13 posted on 02/17/2024 6:50:49 AM PST by READINABLUESTATE (Make orwell fiction again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Facts over truth. ...A Bidenism from the 2020 campaign trail.


14 posted on 02/17/2024 7:14:10 AM PST by blackdog ((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

“.. suggests that the President is either mentally diminished or openly deceptive in such moments...”

Pathological liar/sociopath is what he is.


15 posted on 02/17/2024 7:31:02 AM PST by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I’d love to be a fly on the wall at Rat Party Headquarters these days.


16 posted on 02/17/2024 7:46:24 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
The Democratic Party powers that be are working hard to get rid of President Biden before the election.

One can hope it damages the Democratic Party Brand.

17 posted on 02/17/2024 7:54:33 AM PST by marktwain (The Republic is at risk. Resistance to the Democratic Party is Resistance to Tyranny. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

Pulled the Beau card one time too often.


18 posted on 02/17/2024 7:58:39 AM PST by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Indeed and he proves it often,


19 posted on 02/17/2024 8:07:13 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Just wait until he orders the imprisonment of ordinary Americans based upon their religious beliefs.


20 posted on 02/17/2024 8:11:08 AM PST by DownInFlames (p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson