Also known as a land grab
In addition, the rules from the wildlife service and National Marine Fisheries Service make it easier to designate areas as critical for a species’ survival, even if it is no longer found in those locations.
1 posted on
03/29/2024 8:50:20 AM PDT by
llevrok
To: llevrok
Does this mean they are going to take down the windmills?
2 posted on
03/29/2024 8:57:17 AM PDT by
Neverlift
To: llevrok
Officials also will not consider economic impacts when deciding if animals and plants need protection. IT is all about control.
3 posted on
03/29/2024 8:59:03 AM PDT by
silent majority rising
(When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: llevrok
Officials also will not consider economic impacts when deciding if animals and plants need protection. IT is all about control. Hopefully Trump is taking notes on what to roll back on the first week in office.
4 posted on
03/29/2024 8:59:37 AM PDT by
silent majority rising
(When it is dark enough, men see the stars. Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: llevrok
Officials also will not consider economic impacts when deciding if animals and plants need protection. Oh they'll consider them, yes indeedy they will.
They'll prioritize "protecting" the plants and animals whose "protection" will do the most damage to the US economy and ability to protect itself.
5 posted on
03/29/2024 9:01:43 AM PDT by
null and void
(There’s only one thing that’s for sure. Everyone on all sides a conflict will be happy to lie to you)
To: llevrok
Landgrab is exactly what it is. First they burn you out. Them they breach a damn and flood us out with poison sludge and if that’s not enough they’ll just regulate you to death.
6 posted on
03/29/2024 9:02:50 AM PDT by
AuntB
(Trump is our Ben Franklin - Brilliant, Boisterous, Brave and ALL AMERICAN!)
To: llevrok
“...designate areas as critical for a species’ survival, even if it is no longer found in those locations.”
For example, elk and wolves used to be found in the eastern half of the U.S., buffalo throughout the Great Plains. Can/will all of it be ‘designated’?
7 posted on
03/29/2024 9:03:09 AM PDT by
hanamizu
( )
To: llevrok
They killed all the fish in the Klamath River system. Time to move on to the forests.
8 posted on
03/29/2024 9:10:00 AM PDT by
blackdog
((Z28.310) Be careful what you say. Your refrigerator may be listening & reporting you.)
To: llevrok
Headline doesn’t make sense. Rolls back… sounds like protections were removed.
To: llevrok
Headline is opposite of article content.
“Biden Administration rolls back protections...”
“Biden administration restored rules to protect...”
Did the author even read what was written?
11 posted on
03/29/2024 10:05:29 AM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: llevrok
The title of this post is exactly wrong. :)
14 posted on
03/29/2024 10:09:29 AM PDT by
sasquatch
(Do NOT forget Ashli Babbit! c/o piytar)
To: llevrok
Snort. They’re probably saving the $$$ so they can spend it on their protected species of choice: the American RINO… 🙄
15 posted on
03/29/2024 10:13:51 AM PDT by
DJ Frisat
(If I said something really stupid, chances are I was under the influence of AutoCorrect. 🙄🫤)
To: llevrok
White conservative males?
16 posted on
03/29/2024 1:44:13 PM PDT by
moovova
("The NEXT election is the most important election of our lifetimes!“ LOL...)
To: llevrok
Biden Administration rolls back protections on threatened species
Biden administration restored rules to protect imperiled plants and animals that had been rolled back under former President Trump.The title and first sentence sound opposite.
Today's writers are just nonsensical.
17 posted on
03/30/2024 7:08:59 AM PDT by
Pollard
( Seed Room Wx: 76 degrees - 37% humidity)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson