Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Price of Panseyhood
Rense.com ^ | Sept-13-2001 | Ned Stafford

Posted on 09/16/2001 5:42:22 PM PDT by GhostSoldier

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
No, you are not "just curious". You are trying to paint me into a corner, so that you can trot out your "moral superiority" and wave it around to let us all know how ineffably wonderful you are. Like Mother Teresa, only BETTER!

No one would ever mistake me for Mother Teresa.

No American strike will be aimed at "women and children", or at innocent noncombatants in general. But are there going to be some killed anyway? Oh, yes. Probably quite a few.

As a matter of fact, I agree with you on both counts. Although it will come as a disappointment to some, the United States is not going to "nuke 'em all and let God sort 'em out." I am confident that the military planners will do their best to avoid civilian casualties, as they should.

Nevertheless, there are likely to be civilian casualties, despite our best intentions.

War is a VERY BAD THING, which is why these folks should have thought about the likely results before starting one with us.

Agreed.

41 posted on 09/17/2001 6:35:18 AM PDT by Logophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
(8) We think we are a superpower. Actually we are not, except in the useless sense of having nuclear weapons.

"War is politics by other means." That's what I was taught in the military.

There is more going on in the world than who gives whom a bloodier black eye. There is more going on in the world than the kind of scuffling that little boys engage in on the playground when someone's "honor" is challenged. This is not a game, this is Life. (If it were a game it would need better directions.)

America is the lone superpower for three reasons.

We will prevail. The nation has been stung by an annoying fly (not to minimize the pain of those individuals who have been greviously injured) but we have not been seriously hurt. Now we swat the fly. I would not want to be that fly.

Shalom.

42 posted on 09/17/2001 6:56:00 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I think the time has come to take the gloves off -- and I mean the nuclear gloves.

I don't know you and I don't know what you know, but do you understand what even a limited nuclear war entails??? What do you hope to accomplish with nukes that you couldn't accomplish with conventional weapons?

Shalom.

43 posted on 09/17/2001 7:06:19 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
You offer some excellent points. Thanks!
44 posted on 09/17/2001 10:21:35 AM PDT by GhostSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Did conventional weapons help us defeat the Vietnamese? No, of course not. It is my belief that you have to be willing to destroy virtually every square inch of terroritory that you're invading to win a guerilla war. The only practical way to do that is with nukes. I don't think anyone wants to see a protracted ground war. Let the nukes do their job: Eliminate hostile threats. For good.
45 posted on 09/17/2001 10:23:04 AM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Did conventional weapons help us defeat the Vietnamese?

The problems in Vietnam were not tactical nor armament related - they were political.

Deploying tactical nuclear weapons is extremely difficult. The entire logistics of a nuclear war is much more difficult than the logistics of a conventional war. If you're talking about strategic nukes - the long-term consequences may be worse for the living than for the dead. Those were developed for Mutual Assured Destruction, not a limited war. It's hard to drop a missile on a country then send in the troops to mop up. And trust me, there would be survivors. In fact, the ones you are targeting are the most likey survivors since they probably have very deep caves.

Guns, rockets, missiles, napalm, those can do the job if the politicians have the will to let the army use them.

Shalom.

46 posted on 09/17/2001 10:57:29 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
To "our Airlines"
It is a given that US airlines will have MAJOR input on the new Air Security Policies.
Today, I heard 2 networks tout the idea that "all airport security people" should be "College Graduates"; WRONG. WAITING for Colleges and Government to design and impliment a "degree program" would slow your industry's recovery by 5 years or more. Those "Grads' will have been trained In "warm fuzzy, liberal think", not the "scary world" that military training warns of.

If the FAA and the Airlines give into "liberal think", passengers must not have "nail clippers" or knitting needles; they must be "Sheep" and protected by "College Grad Sheep"
Your Industry will not, soon, recover under that plan. Loyal wolves, coyotes and sheepdogs are needed, both on staff and as passengers.

"Private Security Firms" are known as "rent-a-cops" for a reason. They do it cheap, not well. They hire "warm bodies". They abuse and overwork their few good people.
47 posted on 09/19/2001 10:36:44 PM PDT by PizzaDriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
EXACTLY what I have been saying! The ONLY way we will ever stop this and really BE the "superpower" we say we are is when all the men in this country, IN UNISON, march into the offices where their women work (wives, daughters, sisters, mothers, aunts), throw them over their shoulders, take them home, put their apron back on them, and MAKE them stay home. Then repeal the 19th amendment so that when the MEN are running for office, they can concentrate on the IMPORTANT issues, rather than child care "issues" and abortion "issues" and child-support (i.e. child rent) "issues" and maternity leave "issues", etc., etc., barf, puke, etc. Until that day comes, I won't hold my breath on us being a "superpower", just a bunch of sniveling women looking for a world-wide "group hug".
48 posted on 09/19/2001 10:50:03 PM PDT by realwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realwoman
EXACTLY what I have been saying! The ONLY way we will ever stop this and really BE the "superpower" we say we are is when all the men in this country, IN UNISON, march into the offices where their women work (wives, daughters, sisters, mothers, aunts), throw them over their shoulders, take them home, put their apron back on them, and MAKE them stay home. Then repeal the 19th amendment so that when the MEN are running for office, they can concentrate on the IMPORTANT issues, rather than child care "issues" and abortion "issues" and child-support (i.e. child rent) "issues" and maternity leave "issues", etc., etc., barf, puke, etc. Until that day comes, I won't hold my breath on us being a "superpower", just a bunch of sniveling women looking for a world-wide "group hug".

Wow! I'm speechless.

49 posted on 09/20/2001 11:21:22 AM PDT by GhostSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
Should I take that as a compliment.....or not? BTW, I forgot to mention that they need to go to the daycare center, pick up their children, and take them home where they belong.
50 posted on 09/20/2001 10:00:29 PM PDT by realwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: realwoman
Should I take that as a compliment...?

Absolutely.

I am in awe!

51 posted on 09/20/2001 10:14:13 PM PDT by GhostSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333
Thanks bro. I never miss Fred. Except when he's too wrapped up chasing senoritas down south and forgets to file.

He goes a little far to make a point. The combat arms of the Army, and what seems to me to be the entirety of the Marines, are still manned by men worthy of the name. They seem so young to me, but then so was I, once upon a time. Given leaders with balls the troops will make us all proud... and leadership, good or bad, comes from the top down.

So far President Bush seems to be bringing out the best in everybody, except for the people who prefer Bin Laden to him, like Rep. Marty Meehan and cartoonist Garry Trudeau. In the case of those two wretches there may not be any good to bring out.

Tom Ridge, the new homeland czar, is a combat vet (infantry, B/1/20th Inf, 196th Bde., Americal Div) of Vietnam. That particular unit means he saw the US Army at just about its very worst, and he doesn't think combat is magic or a Nintendo game. d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

52 posted on 09/21/2001 11:05:07 PM PDT by Criminal Number 18F
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
Then I thank you! Of course, I'm sure you can see why I don't have too many women friends! LOL, like I care!
53 posted on 09/23/2001 10:53:48 PM PDT by realwoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
Some very good points. We have become a nation run by the feminine, whether the leader is male or female. We always want 100% consensus. We never want even one person to feel at all bad, and if anyone feels bad then we forget what our goal was and focus on the feel-bad person.

Does anyone seriously doubt that, if this type and size of attack was done against Israel, that within hours at least one Arab capital would exist only in history? The Arabs know that too, which is why they focus their attacks against Israel on smaller terror bombings.

54 posted on 09/23/2001 11:06:57 PM PDT by SEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson