Skip to comments.Events-driven Moderator activities - another look at guidelines
Posted on 09/21/2001 7:49:05 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
Users of FreeRepublic deserve an explanation of recent moderator activities. By signing up to be a user of the forum, everyone agrees to abide by the posted guidelines. This is another look at those guidelines, the intent behind them - and some new guideline enhancements that are being incorporated that need the attention of everyone.
WHY GUIDELINES NOT RULES
Lets begin first by hearing from Jim Robinson about the difference between guidelines and rules, and why FR has guidelines.
One thing I've always resisted on FR is having a lot of rules. Especially if they have to be strictly enforced. We've always had our general posting guidelines, but we like to leave a lot of latitude so as not to stifle debate.Guidelines, rather than hard and fast rules presupposes that the success or failure of them rests with the users of FR. If there is a breakdown, the intent of the forum is compromised. Jim puts it this way.
It is our desire to keep out clearly inappropriate material, while allowing as much room as possible for debate.
We are a news and current events discussion site. We are conservatives. We are adults. The FR forum is a working forum where we are not only discussing news and issues that are important to us, but we are also planning and engaging in political activism projects. We do not appreciate being interrupted by people who want to post insults or smear attacks or personal attacks or otherwise try to disrupt our activities, etc.
WHAT WE WANT, AND DONT WANT
We are looking for news articles, well written and well informed opinion, facts and usable information and certainly having some fun now and then while we pursue the goals of keeping our government as servant of the people - and not allowing it to make us more its servants.
In short, as the lead moderator, I dont like having to wipe up after the children here. I dont enjoy, nor do I or any of those who work with Jim, want to be posting police or thought police and we also do not want to be referees or judges. (The reason that is in quotes is because Jim said it as we talked about the focus of this post.) He also said:
Posters should strive to avoid flame-wars and feuds and/or avoid posting materials that are clearly not welcome here, and then we can all enjoy the forum much more and we will not need as much moderation.Interruption and disruption, in a nutshell, angers many - and causes them to hit the abuse button. That button has been hit far too often of late - creating a higher number of abuse complaints than ever before seen on FR, averaging some 300-500 per day (multiple complaints on between 100 to 200 articles per day.) Needless to say, many of these posts were pulled - many of them due to some of the most vicious and ridiculous flame-wars ever witnessed on FR - along with every sort of violation of posting guidelines. Unfortunately causing otherwise perfectly good articles to disappear in the process.
Such flame-wars brought John Robinson to suggest, outright prohibitingof them - and to say, These types of posts detract from the FR message, people don't come here [for them.] People should have the good sense not to start these threads. Unfortunately everything needs to be spelled out in clear lettering or somebody is going to miss the point.John is right. Personally, I enjoy what we call freeping - reading the news, commenting on articles and keeping up with events. I dont enjoy having to stop and handle abuse complaints, and neither does anyone who works to assist Jim in maintaining order here. That has led to the following.
DEBATE AND DISAGREEMENT - LESS TOLERANCE FOR FLAME-WARS
Disagreement is part of debate, of that there is no question. But too often debate ends with someone calling someone else stupid, or using vulgar names. Moderators review posts and abuse reports received, and keep an eye out for those posts and users that we feel cross the line into racism, profanity and personal attacks. When that happens, we have no choice but to act.
We attempt to be as flexible as we can in allowing reasoned and temperate disagreement, but you can indeed look for less tolerance now for flame-wars on FR. We have been, and will continue to pull posts that are obviously, or thoughtlessly designed to start flame-wars.
In addition to that strengthening of our intent to keep the forum less combative and focused more on our goals, there are additional clarifications and additions to posting guidelines which follow.
NEW MODERATOR PRACTICES - OLD AND NEW GUIDELINES
Because we are at war with terrorism, you may already have seen the old WWII policy of loose-lips sink ships stated in posts here - something Jim began here, and has recently been followed and resurrected by major media outlets.
The policy is simple. If you have information about military movement that has not been published in major media, and is not considered public knowledge it may be inappropriate or unwise to post it on FR. In short, use the question-gauge of, does this come from major media? If so, and if it has not already been posted before, the information will not violate the loose-lips policy.
The following is not new to FR, but this policy has been tightened and will continue as needed.
RACISM POLICY - THE TIGHTEST GUIDELINE ON FR
It is probably best to outline what is, and what is not acceptable where the subject of race is concerned - since first and foremost, race has been used by the enemies of Constitutional limits on government to force the removal of many of our freedoms.
Blatant racism is indeed an ugly thing - and all material that is blatantly racist will be pulled when it is found or reported. Posts that express open hatred of any race, including Arabs - particularly Americans of Arab descent - are candidates for removal, and the expulsion of the poster from FR.
I suggest keeping your anger focused on those who use race to divide and conquer, i.e., the hypocritical socialists in the U.S. who needlessly fan the fires of racism to their advantage. Bigotry is part of racism, and part of religious persecution in the United States and elsewhere.
We know that, but keep your eye on where most of this comes from. Flatly stated, it is not from mainstream Americans, although many have fallen prey to it. The prostitution of major media in support of the socialist elite in academia and government should be slapped down hard with prime examples of the lack of racism right here on FreeRepublic - we have many of all colors and race among us. Let use that, not fall prey to the guile and habits of our real enemies.
News and articles that discuss racial issues such as quotas, immigration, education and hiring practices in rational ways aimed at problems and redress are permitted.
News and articles and replies which discuss events, identified terrorists and those nations that harbor them are certainly permitted - along with appropriate comments, including outrage that does not include vulgarity, profanity, advocacy of killing of innocents, and nuke-em-all sentiments, etc.
Posts and discussion of the religious beliefs of the various sects of Islam (there are several) are also allowed, but are limited to absence of the inappropriate content noted prior in this section.
The US has declared war on terrorism' and those who support it - but all Arabs and Arab nations are not included in the definition of the enemy.' Remember that, and that President Bush said, "In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect."
We have a lot of duplication. Part of the guidelines are that users seek to avoid needless duplication or multiple posts of the same article from the same source. That includes an effort to do a search on the headline of the article to see if it has already been posted - before posting.
Note carefully, the success or failure of preventing needless duplication is predicated on the use of the original source document headline at all times, so that searches on that headline will be successful if it was posted prior. Posts that do not use the original headline may be removed.
Understandably, many times there are two or more people preparing the same post at the same time, having done a search and not found the article posted. Many times people ask moderators to remove a post they found to be a duplicate.
In addition, moderators also remove duplicate posts that are placed in the forum at approximately the same time. This is not to say that important news items can not be re-posted on the forum at some number of hours after an original post was posted. Some of these are appropriate, and moderators are urged to weigh the significance of such duplicates and allow them where appropriate.
We are, as always, open to your comments on moderator activities. Some have made what I feel are good suggestions, some of which have been incorporated into the practices of moderators.
Once again though, we are not open to suggestions that moderators be identified - our anonymity will remain the policy of FR.
Is it acceptable to report about former Muslims who have become Christians or not?
Can anything be done about folks who post the exact same screed (sometimes complete with pictures) over and over on thread after thread? I could cite examples but I'm sure you can come up with them yourself. Such repetitive posts are highly annoying.
|Admin Moderator||member since September 3rd, 2001|
My two cents? Way too many "vanity posts", it takes a long time to sift through the threads to find the "meat".
I'll be right back, going to ask Laz how to runthis place ;)
I see no problem with that.
When 'events are in the saddle', they momentarily feel small and relatively unimportant.
Their 'therapy' is vanity posting, to put themselves back in the center of things.
That's something that definetely puts a black stain on the ethos of FR.
Sort of like refereeing a six-team battle royal in a cage. Wheeeeeee! LOL!
Thanks for dumping the creeps that crawl in here!
That is considered 'spamming' by many here, and is discouraged for the most part. However there are exceptions that are allowed, among them are the need to point to general efforts of a majority of FreeRepublic users in activism, events etc. A note to abuse may help.
I was totally out of line for posting the spin-off thread called "Dumb Argyll Thread Go Bye-Bye." That was right out. Argyll's thread was atrocious (I saved it off-line in case anyone wants it for entertainment purposes) but my vanity thread was uncalled for. If I see Argyll (No Current FReeper by that name) in Union Square holding a bloody nose and picking up pieces of his cello, I will apologize.
I was NOT responsible for Roebucks' spin-off of my spin-off. I support FR's decision to pull this thread, posted under Breaking News, if you can believe it.
I promise not to post military movements, even if I see them on national television, marching through Times Square on bicycles and squawking like chickens. Broadway is entertaining enough.
I love FreeRepublic, I love America, and I love Corona with a wedge of lime.
Still in Manhattan, wearing my new porkpie hat, and just being,
The newbie date is always good for a laugh though!
Because we are 'at war' with terrorism, you may already have seen the old WWII policy of 'loose-lips sink ships' stated in posts here - something Jim began here, and has recently been followed and resurrected by major media outlets.
International Security, U.S. Department of State is one good source to control rumor and confirm info that would not be classified.
In the four years I've been here, I've never once complained about a post or hit the abuse button. I got a thick skin and can deal with anything anybody wants to throw at me. But the guidelines are here for a reason and they ought to be enforced if they are to be taken seriously by the rest of us.
The only suggestion I would make, if it can be done, is to have the option to "take back" a hasty post or reply. More than once, in the heat of the moment, I have hit the POST button and then thought immediately afterwards: "Oh crap! What the hell did I post that for!"
For YOU PEOPLE
Never-Ending Christian Chronicles
Pray For Bush Day xxx
Another Day In The Life Of George W. Bush (with photos)
If you can't make your point in under a hundred threads, give it a FREAKING rest, will ya??? These threads are what dominate when I refresh "Latest Posts". At least you have an option to opt out of vanities in your preferences. I can't opt out of these.
What is "Extended News"? I don't get it.
I have seen a considerable number of threads where "members since September 15" converge and totally distract serious posters with a stream of Big Lie progaganda blaming Israel for 9-11, talking about the captivity of American policy to the "Israel lobby," insinuating when challenged that Jews and their allies are victimizing honest speakers like the poster.
All this stuff is classic and identifiable anti-Semitic disinformation, but an "anti-racism" guideline won't catch it.
There may be nothing to be done about it, and I am grateful for the good sense that guides the moderation of this forum. But I do believe that there are anti-Semitic disruptors here.
Well, lol - sometimes (-:
Thanks for the comments *bg*
Thanks so very very much for keeping on top of things and making freerepublic a great place to be.
That is the biggest motivation that keeps me here, I think. Can't speak for all, but I know that helping him live a bit more normal life gives me my greatest satisfaction.
Love that 'take it back' idea - but not sure how easy it would be to program. John??
Good job and thanks.
Exception made for FReepathon threads, however!
Renounce the big A and you're dead. It's an obligation, read their comic book...
I hope this helps you out.