[RedBloodedAmerican]

The article posted in #1 sounds like it could have been written by the same people who wrote the one you posted! Great minds, and all that...! Thank you for bringing it back, I think it has some good info that is very pertinent.

[Clinton's a liar]

It's stranger than that, RBA! When Jon sent me the first draft for this piece, it was about twice as long as the limit allowed (1,000 words). I cut it down to 984, changing wording, etc. The first time I read the Tony Blankley piece was today, even though it was quoted in our piece (according to the Washington Times). Jon did the research and first draft. Anyway, the really strange part is, I put in adjectives that Mr. Blankley used that weren't in the first draft that Jon sent to me! Bizarre.

[Amelia]

The article posted in #1 sounds like it could have been written by the same people who wrote the one you posted!

You know, you're right...the focus of the two articles is different, but in the bodies, it's the same information, in the same order, just reworded. Almost like someone rewrote last year's article to make a different point.

It sure is a good point though.