Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anthrax Q & A
Oct. 1, 2001 | Kevin G. Briggs

Posted on 09/30/2001 11:18:34 PM PDT by seeker41

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: HiTech RedNeck
Penicillin does work against some strains of anthrax, but yes, you're correct - there are other strains that apparently are resistant.

Also, I have family members who have already had problems with drugs in the -cillin family, so we'll have to be prepared in other ways.

21 posted on 10/01/2001 12:06:21 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
I'm particularly concerned about this threat cuz my residence is in the 4th largest city in the USA with a very busy port. To top it all off I just got layed off at the 2nd biggest computer maker 10 days ago. Oh well, we are all in the same boat and am more concerned about my country at this point.
22 posted on 10/01/2001 12:06:47 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Or cranberry pills, available at health food stores. I know of two brands and they are much more concentrated than the juice.
Hmm, can I see a new market for Welch's? "Your cure against Anthrax, available in -Apple -Raspberry and new -Mango flavors" :)
23 posted on 10/01/2001 12:08:19 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lelio
How about straight cranberries?
24 posted on 10/01/2001 12:10:01 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Scenario 2: A sophisticated and well-trained technical terrorist group with four medium-sized planes (DC-3 size) were shown to potentially kill 35 percent of the U.S. population with one night flight spraying anthrax over key population centers.

Bye bye blue zone

25 posted on 10/01/2001 12:11:30 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Scenario 2: A sophisticated and well-trained technical terrorist group with four medium-sized planes (DC-3 size) were shown to potentially kill 35 percent of the U.S. population with one night flight spraying anthrax over key population centers.

btw the bye bye blue zone was gallows humor. however with the current shootdown orders for straying aircraft, this scenario sounds unlikely

26 posted on 10/01/2001 12:12:52 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I agree, two many F-16s flying around up there. But I have had bizarre thoughts of hot air balloons and other such things.
27 posted on 10/01/2001 12:18:43 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
What's the "blue zone"?
28 posted on 10/01/2001 12:22:43 AM PDT by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Do you know if our dogs can also become ill, and if so, how good their chances are of surviving? This concerns me as much as getting ill with it myself!
29 posted on 10/01/2001 12:22:56 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hopefulpilgrim
I think all living creatures are susceptible. Dogs were used in Iraq for such experimentation with Anthrax. I have also heard reports that our sats. detected lots of dead animals in one of OBL's training camps.
30 posted on 10/01/2001 12:27:12 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: lelio
Allusion to the USA Today county by county map of Bush vs. Gore election results. Big cities are traditionally heavy Democrat voting zones, colored blue in this map.
31 posted on 10/01/2001 12:29:10 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
At least the hot air balloons, kites, model airplanes etc. either lack the carrying capacity or the roving capacity to wage such a widespread attack.
32 posted on 10/01/2001 12:30:32 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
They've tested all kinds of nasties on animals, not just anthrax.

We should recruit PETA to go over there!

33 posted on 10/01/2001 12:32:21 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
"Former Secretary of Defense Cohen illustrated this point on TV by saying that a five-pound bag of anthrax, if properly dispersed, could kill perhaps half of the population of Washington, D.C."

This is what got my attention initally. Now dispersal is another matter, heck I even thought about mosquito spraying trucks like we see here in the summer especially afer the great Houston flood in June.

34 posted on 10/01/2001 12:40:06 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
For this small a quantity to do the job, would virtually require spraying it directly in everybody's nostrils.
35 posted on 10/01/2001 12:44:09 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
We should recruit PETA to go over there!

And send Je$$e Jacka$$ and Al $harpton as their emissaries...

36 posted on 10/01/2001 12:44:15 AM PDT by wayne_shrugged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
TREATMENT - ANTHRAX from emedicine.com

A number of possible therapeutic strategies have yet to be fully explored experimentally or submitted for approval to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The recommendations provided do not represent uses currently approved by the FDA but are a consensus based on best available information of recent studies.

Given the fulminant course of inhalation anthrax, early antibiotic administration is essential to maximize patient survival. Given the difficulty in achieving timely microbiologic diagnosis of anthrax, all persons with fever or evidence of systemic disease in an area where anthrax cases are occurring should be treated empirically for anthrax until the disease is excluded.

No clinical studies exist of the treatment of inhalation anthrax in humans. Most naturally occurring strains of anthrax are sensitive to penicillin, and penicillin historically has been the preferred therapy for the treatment of anthrax. Penicillin and doxycycline are FDA-approved antibiotics for anthrax. Doxycycline is the preferred option from the tetracycline class of antibiotics because of its proven efficacy in monkey studies. Experts currently recommend initiation of ciprofloxacin or other fluoroquinolones in adults with presumed inhalation anthrax infection. Following a terrorist attack, assume resistance to penicillin and tetracycline class antibiotics until laboratory testing demonstrates otherwise.

In a contained casualty setting (a situation in which a modest number of patients require therapy), initiate intravenous antibiotics for symptomatic patients. In adults, ciprofloxacin 400 mg IV q12h is recommended. Traditionally, ciprofloxacin and other fluoroquinolones are not recommended for use in children younger than 16-18 years because of a link to permanent arthropathy in adolescent animals and transient arthropathy in a small number of children.

Balancing these small risks against the real risk of death and resistant strains of B anthracis, experts recommend that ciprofloxacin be given to a pediatric population for initial therapy or postexposure prophylaxis following anthrax attack. In children, ciprofloxacin at 20-30 mg/kg/d IV in 2 daily doses (not to exceed 10 g/d) is recommended. If antibiotic susceptibility testing allows, substitute intravenous penicillin for the fluoroquinolones. For adults and children older than 12 years, penicillin G at 4 million U IV q4h is recommended for 60 days. Doxycycline at 100 mg IV q12h for 60 days is an acceptable alternative for adults. For children younger than 12 years, penicillin G is dosed 50,000 U/kg IV q6h for 60 days.

In experimental models, antibiotic therapy during anthrax infection has prevented development of an immune response. This suggests that even if the antibiotic-treated patient survives anthrax infection, risk of recurrence remains for at least 60 days. Oral therapy should replace intravenous therapy as soon as a patient's clinical condition improves.

Historically, the treatment of cutaneous anthrax has been oral penicillin. Recent recommendations suggest that oral fluoroquinolones or tetracycline antibiotics, as well as amoxicillin, are suitable alternatives if antibiotic susceptibility is proven. Although previous guidelines have suggested treating cutaneous anthrax with 7-10 days of therapy, recent recommendations suggest treatment for 60 days in the setting of bioterrorism, given the presumed exposure to the primary aerosol. Treatment of cutaneous anthrax generally prevents progression to systemic disease, although it does not prevent the formation and evolution of the eschar.

Other antibiotics effective against B anthracis in vitro include chloramphenicol, erythromycin, clindamycin, extended spectrum penicillins, macrolides, aminoglycosides, vancomycin, cefazolin, and other first-generation cephalosporins.

In pregnant women, experts recommend that ciprofloxacin be given for therapy and postexposure prophylaxis following anthrax attack. Substitute intravenous penicillin for the fluoroquinolones if microbiologic testing confirms penicillin susceptibility.

37 posted on 10/01/2001 1:07:49 AM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Thanks- I'll cross-link this to these:

NBC/ABC Warfare Survival Skills Links

The Poor-Boy Nuke-- Bioterrorism***

38 posted on 10/01/2001 1:48:36 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
a yikes! bump
39 posted on 10/01/2001 7:49:52 AM PDT by woollyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
seeker41 post #9: "Here's the link to the website with more information, if someone could link it will be appreciated. "

GO TO THIS LINK (it's about the only HTML tag I can do so I get a kick out of helping other FReepers any time I get a chance).

ps: Hi, backhoe. Thanks for your links.

40 posted on 10/01/2001 7:59:36 AM PDT by spald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson