Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Info on Smallpox vaccine for freepers
Centers for Disease Control ^ | Bones

Posted on 10/21/2001 10:33:10 PM PDT by bonesmccoy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-275 next last
To: tallhappy
The routine vaccination was ended in aro9und 1972. What are you doing getting it in the late 70's. I think small pox immunization should begin again. Maybe it will not be used. But if it is, staring immunization after that will be too late for the first to get it.

I had a smallpox immunization before 1976 and again in 1976 right before we left for the Middle East. It was required to enter Iran. The doc didn't have it on hand because it wasn't routinely given anymore here in the U.S. so he had to special order it for us from a drug company or the government.

201 posted on 10/23/2001 3:40:58 AM PDT by chantal7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Perhaps you are right vaccinia was actually a mutation from cow pox. I know cow pox was used as the first "vaccination" against small pox when Jenner rubbed the scabs from cow's utters into cuts on the arms. Perhaps I was wrong there, but I thought vaccinia was a mutant form of small pox itself.

Actually it IS similarity of antibodies BECAUSE the coat proteins are so similar. I'm not sure how familiar you are with immunology, but antibodies have to BIND to an antigen FIRST so that the immune system recognizes that the antigen is foreign (or cancer). In this way, since the same antibodies bind BOTH viruses, the body's immunological response is the same.

You're right, if one could get ahold of small pox AND had the technology, then one could alter the coat proteins. Although technically difficult, the protocols are in place for this sort of transformation. And I agree; the Taliban do not have the technology or the brains to pull this off. Thank God.

Luckily, I've been vaccinated against smallpox, but many have not. Let hope and pray this virus is NEVER unleashed in this country. And to think we actually had the gall to think we had "erradicated" smallpox from the earth. Humans can be so arrogant.

202 posted on 10/23/2001 7:24:11 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
BUMP
203 posted on 10/23/2001 8:15:37 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chantal7
"I think small pox immunization should begin again."

It wouldn't come without a cost. When the vaccination was still administered, one in a million recipients suffered death or brain damage. In one in 18,000 there resulted severe infection with the virus spreading throughout the body.

Cure for Bioterror may be worse than the disease, NYT, 10/22

204 posted on 10/23/2001 8:28:22 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

Comment #205 Removed by Moderator

To: dbbeebs
OOP's sorry it was the polio vaccine. SV40 contamination of polio vaccines.www.whale.to/vaccines/cancer.html
206 posted on 10/23/2001 10:14:10 AM PDT by GREY GHOSTt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
sorry i goofed it was the polio sv40
207 posted on 10/23/2001 10:15:58 AM PDT by GREY GHOSTt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Couldn't think of a stupider scenario than for a terrorist to release smallpox in this country. It would be like setting off a nuke in your neighbor's backyard.

At 30% mortality rate, smallpox in the US also translates into 300 million dead Muslims worldwide.

208 posted on 10/23/2001 10:31:59 AM PDT by freebilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanGurl
Your situation with your daughter certainly complicates matters for you. I would get the smallpox vaccine TODAY if I could, and give it to my kids (teenagers and older). Of course, I would listen to what my doctor had to say about the vaccination and read up on it in the PDR and other sources. But being healthy, I can't imagine anything that we could learn that would cause me any hesitation in getting us all vaccinated.

After all, we vaccinated EVERYONE (with few exceptions for very specific reasons) for years and years. Of all the people I knew (10,000, 20,000, 50,000???), I never knew or even heard of anyone having an adverse reaction. If it was considered generally safe then, why would that analysis be any different now? Especially when the risk of the disease is so much greater?

If I were you, in order to protect my child if for no other reason, I would agitate for the right of people like me to get vaccinated ASAP. A non-immunized person receives great benefit from the fact that they are surrounded by immunized people. It makes it much less likely that they will come in contact with the infection.

This decision is really a personal one and should be left up to the individual or his parents. The government, the CDC, and the medical community can certainly make recommendations, but IT'S MY CHOICE, not theirs, just like it's your choice about your daughter.
209 posted on 10/23/2001 11:22:03 AM PDT by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: matamoros
Did they positively identify the virus via blood serology? Several different viruses can create mumps.
210 posted on 10/23/2001 9:51:55 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
I'm very familiar with immunology. However, the coat proteins in the virus up-regulate the plasma cells which produce the immunoglobulins in question. So, yes, you are correct regarding the similarity in the antibodies, but I think most immunologists would phrase it as similarity in the protein coating of the various similar virus antigens in the smallpox family (ok science mode off for now!)
211 posted on 10/23/2001 11:10:45 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
Yeah, I hear you, but my 2 cents on this is: Heck, can you think of anything more stupid that thinking you could hi-jack a plane, pilot a jumbo jet, and then fly it into the WTC? In retrospect, I'm sure some of our military men would not say that it was stupid (given the resources utterly destroyed in the process and the relative lack of loss on the part of Al Queda). However, to our moralistic view, it seems terrible to lose just one life. America has such a great commitment to life, liberty and happiness that we often do not comprehend how little some others regard the same values.
212 posted on 10/23/2001 11:13:54 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Aurelius
thanks for the bump!
213 posted on 10/23/2001 11:14:19 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: austinTparty
I was part of the first generation NOT to be vaccinated and I was born in 1969.

I was born in 1970. I do not have any funky scars on my upper arms, but I have ALWAYS wondered what those freaky things were on so many other people's arms. And I seem to recall seeing plenty of them on people my age or younger, not just old people. Are there any other vaccinations that can cause those round scars? Is it possible to have gotten the vaccine and just have had a strong enough immune system to prevent the pustle from ever forming? (Hey, some people can go through serious chemo and never lose a single strand of hair.)

214 posted on 10/23/2001 11:17:31 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
However, it is important to note that the immunologic effect of the vaccine wanes (decreases) over the years.

I wonder who says so. And/or why.

215 posted on 10/23/2001 11:28:04 PM PDT by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
I really think they ought to do some studies. The body is a miraculous thing, they just might be surprised at how the body would react even if the vaccination is 40 or 50 years old. It would sure cut down on the requirements.
216 posted on 10/23/2001 11:32:25 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: McGavin999
But the kids havn't gotten those vaccines, though.
217 posted on 10/23/2001 11:42:39 PM PDT by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Concentrate
That's the point. If those who have been vaccinated don't actually require a booster, then there will be more available for the children. They should get it first anyway, but chances are, they will vaccinate all the people in any city that is infected. If we know ahead of time that the body will still produce antibodies in adults who have been vaccinated years ago, that will leave more for children in other areas. They need to be exploring this possiblity NOW!
218 posted on 10/24/2001 12:14:57 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

Comment #219 Removed by Moderator

To: bonesmccoy
You are welcome.
220 posted on 10/24/2001 9:36:46 AM PDT by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 261-275 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson