Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control After September 11
FOXNEWS ^ | Friday, November 2, 2001 | Glenn Harlan Reynolds

Posted on 11/02/2001 9:09:31 PM PST by Scalia Rules

Edited on 04/22/2004 12:31:31 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last
To: truth_seeker
Any recommendations about the best hearing protection?

Wear double: ear plugs (properly inserted) AND ear muffs for protection.

61 posted on 11/02/2001 10:59:09 PM PST by dbbeebs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The Cajun; truth_seeker
"I've had it for about 30 years"

I got my hearing messed up due to firing these in Viet Nam. I was a Gunners Mate, GMG 3.


62 posted on 11/02/2001 11:01:30 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
1) The rejoinder to Hobbes IS game theory. A stateless society, contra Hobbes, is not a zero-sum game, but more of a hawk-dove game, where cooperation in the norm.

2) Robert Wright is a pretentious bore. Like Tom Friedman of the NY Times, he is much smarter than the average journalistic pundit, but at the same time way way overrated. Only a fews hours after the attacks on the morning of Sept. 11, he's up on Slate.com saying "s=See, see, see everybody, this PROVES we don't need National Missile Defense."

63 posted on 11/02/2001 11:02:21 PM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: epow
A lot of old soldiers are still alive because what they're telling you is true. They are all the "proof" I need, anyway. We need a platform for the 10mm, the down-loaded version being the now-popular .40 S&W. Then military and police could carry essentially the same sidearm, perhaps the police with the more community-friendly .40 load...until they felt the need to pop in another magazine and, say...penetrate a fleeing truck filled with gasoline bombs...perhaps. Silly me. That would never happen!
64 posted on 11/02/2001 11:04:46 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
Well I "research and write for a living," too--just not as law professor, but as a commercial and appellate litigator. I think law professors like him have the time to put up a web log like that. He probably teaches two classes a semeser, three at the most. I, on the other hand, have to find the time to bill 2100 hours per year to somebody willing to pay my going rate.
65 posted on 11/02/2001 11:06:06 PM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Re: Post #62

Gee...that would look great on my lawn! If you've got an "extra" one....you're not Santa, are you? Just checking.

66 posted on 11/02/2001 11:08:02 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Scalia Rules
Robert Wright is a pretentious bore. Like Tom Friedman of the NY Times, he is much smarter than the average journalistic pundit, but at the same time way way overrated. Only a fews hours after the attacks on the morning of Sept. 11, he's up on Slate.com saying "s=See, see, see everybody, this PROVES we don't need National Missile Defense."

I don't agree with everything that he writes, and I particularly don't agree with that, but I do like his books, "The Moral Animal," and "Non-Zero: The Logic of Human Destiny." I don't always agree with him, but I rarely find him boring.

67 posted on 11/02/2001 11:11:47 PM PST by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
Not that I'm sure it would work, but with his logic...may he be the first one a rocket hits. Then we can ask him if he's changed his mind. I bet he'll have changed it a lot.
68 posted on 11/02/2001 11:14:43 PM PST by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: epow
Look, putting all your macho "one shot stopping power" b.s aside, most people are not cops or ex-military, or have the capcity to handle really high caliber firearms.

A solid 9mm, like a Beretta 92FS, Sig, or Ruger P95 is 1) very reliable 2) very accurate 3) has significantly less recoil, and thus easier to handle than a .45. In addition, the higher capacity magazine on a 9mm (which in some of the earlier pre-Klinton ban models you can still get with 15-16 rounds) is another plus, given that criminals often travel in packs.

So to all you ex-Navy Seal and Spec Ops types thumping your chests out there, my hat's off to you. But when it comes to the defensive needs of the average civilian (a topic which, if you claim to be a Second Amendment defender, you should NOT be sneering at) the 9mm in most cases is the tool of choice.

69 posted on 11/02/2001 11:24:05 PM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
"Gee...that would look great on my lawn!"

Like I'd like that in my yard also. Has a range of 9 miles!
70 posted on 11/02/2001 11:26:56 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: PoorMuttly
"Not that I'm sure it would work, but with his logic...may he be the first one a rocket hits. Then we can ask him if he's changed his mind. I bet he'll have changed it a lot."

LOL!

Opposition to missile defense is an article of faith for his type. And I've never quite understood the reason for the tenacity in which this opposition is held (other than the fact that the Right favors it). In the abstract, missile defense doesn't seem to be a position that inherently cuts either way, whether you are a hawk or dove. Missile defense is something seems compatible with a program of dramtically reducing offensive nuclear stockpiles.

71 posted on 11/02/2001 11:32:30 PM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Scalia Rules
It seems that most of the policmen in Dallas are going to the 40 caliber because the 9mm doesn't have the stopping power that they want. It's recoil and report are just about like the 9mm, but the stopping power is better.
72 posted on 11/02/2001 11:33:54 PM PST by soapboxsallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub
Have you ever used a CZ-52 (7.62X25 ordinance)? Nice weapon, but lots of "report."
73 posted on 11/02/2001 11:36:54 PM PST by soapboxsallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: soapboxsallie
I still here some bad report about the .40 S&W.

By the way, as for "Suck & Weasel," I'll never forgive those bastards for selling out and caving in to that Klinton hack, Andrew Cuomo, when he was at HUD. They are a disgrace.

74 posted on 11/02/2001 11:38:08 PM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Scalia Rules
I shoot 357,9mm,40s&w,45's and 22's. The tightest groups are 22,357 ( revolver ),9mm,45 and then the 40s&w. But I hit my target with them all. My conceal carry is either Glock 23 or springfield V-10. Carry the glock more because of the rds it carrys.
75 posted on 11/02/2001 11:39:58 PM PST by longrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: soapboxsallie
"Have you ever used a CZ-52 (7.62X25 ordinance)?"

no, the armory I was in charge of on my destroyer had mainly weapons from early 60's and before.
I was on board '66-'69 .50 cal, .30 cal. .45 etc
76 posted on 11/02/2001 11:45:35 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: longrider
I don't care for Glocks because I don't care for polymer. But that's just me. But it's not like I leave my firearm in the sink every night!

Aside from that, I prefer Beretta to Glock, particulaly for conceal carry purposes, because of Beretta's added layers of safety features. I also have a neurotic prediliction for actually SEEING the hammer!

77 posted on 11/02/2001 11:45:38 PM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Scalia Rules
.
78 posted on 11/03/2001 12:23:55 AM PST by Scalia Rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Scalia Rules
The right to self-defense is as constant as gravity and the 2nd law of thermodynamics -- natural law. The natural law of self-defense. Whether acknowledged or not, they have always existed. 

It used to be, before the September 11, terrorist attacks on U.S. soil that the mainstream media was pro gun control. Since that date several authors have written articles about the flip-flop, turning-of-the-tide regarding gun control. Here's some enlightening questions to ponder...

1. Is the media just now learning that the right to self-defense has always been rooted in natural law? If so, then mainstream media people are incompetent and the readers deserve far better. Well Mr. and Mrs. media hot shot, is it that you're incompetent? Or...

2.  Has the media always known that self-defense is natural law? If so, then your intent to deceive your readers, listeners and viewers in regards to gun control is more than enough reason that you be boycotted and/or ostracized. 

Of course, a person would think that the CEO of every media publishing house would investigate whether the employees are incompetent or if their intent was to deceive their customers.

Rather than putting these questions to news reporters, journalists and talking heads, they should be put to their bosses -- the CEOs, board of directors and share-holders.

79 posted on 11/03/2001 12:41:04 AM PST by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scalia Rules
their desperation is showing by them now wanting to sue the 'daisy' bb gun mfg.
the rubber band guns are next!

happiness is a warm .357 snub nosed Ruger tucked in my belt!

80 posted on 11/03/2001 12:52:26 AM PST by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson