Posted on 11/08/2001 10:12:29 AM PST by Aquinasfan
My last lab earned a MHR title. I know a little about training animals. You're not an animal and should respond to reason. And besides the goal is pro-LIFE, not pro-choice.
Big mistake. Humans are indeed animals. Yes they can respond to reason, but the animal response is primary. Being an animal, I instinctively responded to your slap in a negative way. As a reasoning human I figured you just did not understand how to influence people.
Perhaps you mean Homo Sapiens.
I've told you before, but perhaps you have forgotten, that I am not interested in your theology. A soul is a theological/philosophical concept that is irrelevant to the scientific discussion of when a new human being is created.
You can no more scientifically prove when a soul may enter a body any more than you can scientifically prove how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Yes, it's time to get serious ... for all that these graphics offend, its time to toughen up and know that we do this for the little ones. What's swept under the carpet is allowed to continue, and these little ones cannot be swept away any longer!!
If you haven't already done so, please add your signature to the petition for the unborn (and ask
others to do likewise). These little ones need our voice to speak out for them. God Bless you!
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b7c063605a8.htm
Those images of are fake. If you open the images in an image editor and zoom way in, you can see where the manipulations (joining of several images, smoothing the intersections, etc) has taken place.
Glad to hear that. I've been to a few protests and wondered if it made any difference. God bless.
Is a hospitalized person on a respirator dead?
I'm pro-choice. You're pro-abortion.
I consider the concept of a "soul" irrelevant to this discussion. We seem to disagree on that point. In any event, the existence of a "soul" is unprovable by any scientific means.
Let's see where we are. We do seem to agree that a new member of the species Homo Sapiens is created when the sperm joins the egg. Am I correct that we agree on this point?
If that is the case, then any futher discussion on this topic is also irrelevant.
I believe that the introduction of the soul into a homo sapian infant when it takes its first breath is what make a homo sapian a person.
What does that question have to do with the fact the soul is introduced by the first breath?
How did you arrive at that condescending comparison?
Come visit us at Freepathon Holidays are Here Again: Let's Really Light Our Tree This Year - Thread 6
and be a part of something that is larger than all of us.
Alone, we are a voice crying in the wilderness. Together we are a force for positive action!
Don't be left out!
Be one who can someday say..................... "I was there when..................."
Thank you to everyone who has already come by and become a part!
You associate breathing with personhood. I therefore conclude that you would regard someone who can't breathe on his own (on a respirator) as clinically dead.
I'm in favor of allowing people the maximum degree of freedom or "choice" that's morally permissible.
You, on the other hand, are in favor of killing people up to the time when they draw their first breath, thus dramatically reducing their ability to exercise their "freedom of choice." Because they're dead.
You have made a wrong assumption. Just because I believe personhood does not exist until the first breath does not mean that favor killing fetuses up until the time they draw their first breath.
If you are interested in a true representation of my stand on abortion, please read this post by Walden. I agree 100% with everything she said in that post.
I am sorry that my belief about when humans get souls is so troubling for you. I am not advocating that any other person accept this as true for themselves.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.